Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lucky Crypto Official

Channel

Lucky Crypto Official

@luckycryptofficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

364subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882484155
TypeChannel
Username@luckycryptofficial
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/luckycryptofficial

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3643783712 September 2026 — 378 subscribers2 September 2026 — 378 subscribers11 September 2026 — 375 subscribers19 September 2026 — 370 subscribers4 October 2026 — 369 subscribers13 October 2026 — 364 subscribers2 September 202613 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 362–380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 13:46364-5
4 Oct 2026, 11:54369-1
19 Sept 2026, 15:17370-5
11 Sept 2026, 17:21375-3
2 Sept 2026, 06:30378no change
2 Sept 2026, 06:15378first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1045.5%
👍836.4%
🔥418.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC30 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

📊🚨 #BTC UPDATE — Aug 30, 2026 BTC cooling off near $78,000 after last week's strong rally 🔥 🔥 What's Happening: Price dipped slightly as macro caution crept in, but the broader recovery structure from recent weeks is still holding. Momentum from the rally hasn't fully faded. 🟢 Support: $76,500–$77,700 First zone to defend. A break below risks a deeper pullback toward $75,000. 🔴 Resistance: $79,000–$81,000 Bulls ne…

👍3

28 Aug 2026, 00:42 UTC44 viewsread 2 September 2026

📊🚨 #BTC UPDATE — Aug 28, 2026 BTC just cleared $80,000 and momentum is heating up 🔥🚀 🔥 What's Happening: Strong breakout week — #ETFs pulling in billions, altcoins joining the rally, miners outperforming. Bulls firmly in control. 🟢 Support: $78,900–$79,400 First line of defense after the breakout. Losing this could trigger a quick retest lower. 🔴 Resistance: $81,500–$83,000 Next test zone. A clean break here keeps…

27 Aug 2026, 01:14 UTC51 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

📊🚨 BTC UPDATE — Aug 27, 2026 BTC holding strong near $78,000 after a powerful breakout this week 🔥 🔥 What's Happening: Price cleared major resistance and is consolidating near recent highs. Momentum remains strong, but RSI is stretched — watch for a possible cooldown. 🟢 Support: $77,650–$76,000 Key zone to hold. A break below could trigger a pullback toward $75,500. 🔴 Resistance: $79,200–$80,000 Next wall to clear.…

👍2

24 Aug 2026, 02:40 UTC62 viewsread 2 September 2026

📊 BTC: Rejected At The Top ❌ Pulled back, now testing support. 🟢 76.0k holding | 🔴 78.6k = key wall My POV: Neutral to Bearish ⚠️ Not a signal — wait for confirmation.

23 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC60 viewsread 2 September 2026

📊 BTC: Testing 77.4k Wall 👀 Bounced from lows, now knocking on resistance. 🟢 76.0k holding | 🔴 77.6k breaks = 78.8k next Bulls or bears? 🟢🔴 ⚠️ Not a signal — wait for confirmation.

22 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC60 viewsread 2 September 2026

📊🚨 BTC ALERT — Decision Time Loading... BTC is coiling right under resistance and the tension is building 👀 🔥 The Setup: Price pulled back, held its ground, and is now grinding sideways just below the ceiling. Classic "calm before the move" pattern. 🟢 Buy Zone: $76,000–76,500 Lose this and $75,000–75,500 comes into play next. 🔴 Breakout Zone: $78,000–79,000 This is THE level. Clean break above = doors open for con…

29 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC117 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/cB_6VVZy_cg?si=7w2hLI5E6yszjE3_

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @luckycryptofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DD ACADEMY PUNJAB
@dda43 · 34,963
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lucky Crypto Official” (@luckycryptofficial), 364 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luckycryptofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.