Channel

[архив] 𝇂𝇄ִ۫ ۫͜ ִℒ𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝒩𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑢𝑟ั𝑛𝑎 ℱ𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑑 ֺ︩ ۫✶ ֢ ִ 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜

@lucenotturna_flood

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Growth

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 16 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days

—

no view readings in window

Avg views / post

—

no view readings

Reaction rate

—

this channel exposes no reaction counts

Posts in window

1

of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lucenotturna_flood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[архив] 𝇂𝇄ִ۫ ۫͜ ִℒ𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝒩𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑢𝑟ั𝑛𝑎 ℱ𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑑 ֺ︩ ۫✶ ֢ ִ 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜” (@lucenotturna_flood), 17 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lucenotturna_flood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.