Channel
@lubovnayalubov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
158subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002025580971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lubovnayalubov |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lubovnayalubov |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 158 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 157 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 159 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 160 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 159 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 159 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
237 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5197481714644982719 | 120 | 50.6% | |
| custom 5197706899780320846 | 57 | 24.1% | |
| custom 5197269710764285816 | 46 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5307704336535542765 | 14 | 5.91% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#изпоследнего в июле: 🟡привет, фриланс 🟡поездка в Ростов, подружки, кайф 🟡3 книги 🟡нехорошая новость 🟡встреча с итальянско-русской душой 🟡писала картины 🟡к Ластику приезжали подружки (ко мне тоже) 🟡мнооого анализа 🟡ко мне вернулась влюблённость (я скучала) 🟡винил, который я очень давно хотела 🟡лихие поступки 🟡играла в теннис
custom 519748171464498271912custom 51972697107642858162custom 51977068997803208462
Ограниченность мышления людей поражает. Туда же можно записать степень бестактности. Когда уже этот процент человечества поймёт, что нельзя судить по картинке, по своим каким-то убеждениям, предположениям и, если уж так распирает, то лучше спросить напрямую. Только вспомнить о такте. Всё это усугубляет век анализа и сравнения в цифровом медиа поле. Я никогда не мыслила такими категориями и мне всегда было, по большо…
custom 519748171464498271933custom 519726971076428581615custom 519770689978032084615
Удачно вчера зашла в Фикспрайс и сэкономила полторы тыщи)) Сейчас читаю «ген Рафаила» — пока не могу понять свои ощущения, но симпатии с первых страниц точно не возникло 🫠
custom 519748171464498271922custom 53077043365355427658custom 51977068997803208465
Как хорошо стоять в окне, пить эспрессо и смотреть на летний дождь ❤️
custom 519726971076428581619custom 519748171464498271916custom 51977068997803208467custom 53077043365355427656
🤎
custom 519748171464498271923custom 519726971076428581610custom 51977068997803208468
Из вчерашнего ❤️ Садовая дробь один)
custom 519770689978032084620custom 519748171464498271914
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @lubovnayalubov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“с любовью, Любовь” (@lubovnayalubov), 158 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lubovnayalubov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.