Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 38 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 761–769 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 15:21
767
-1
7 Sept 2026, 23:18
768
+4
30 Aug 2026, 06:16
764
+1
24 Aug 2026, 03:25
763
+1
16 Aug 2026, 07:38
762
-2
8 Aug 2026, 12:31
764
-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:50
765
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:48
765
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
524 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
247
47.1%
🙏
151
28.8%
🔥
90
17.2%
👍
21
4.01%
😍
8
1.53%
🤗
4
0.763%
😁
3
0.573%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 524 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дорогие друзья, мы будем с вами делиться новыми аудио-записями бесед о Дхамме, которые сейчас в Панчакири идут перед принятием пищи. Все аудио будут доступны сразу на русском языке в наших плейлистах. Сохраняйте себе в избранное💛
Литрес
https://www.litres.ru/podcast/luangta-narongsak-khinalayo/besedy-o-dhamme-73984137
Яндекс.Музыка
https://music.yandex.ru/album/42296829
VK аудио
https://vk.ru/audios-234496265
*не…
Чем больше человек цепляется за спокойствие, тем больше он боится его потерять.
Чем больше человек цепляется за сосредоточение, тем больше он страдает, когда сосредоточение подходит к концу.
Чем больше человек цепляется за мудрость, тем больше он страдает, когда мудрость не возникает.
Делимся с вами отличной новой беседой "Желание быть хорошим — тонкий яд, замаскированный под добродетель".
Друзья, аудио запись полюбившейся за последние дни беседы «Просто поток причин и условий». Включайте в наушниках 💛
Литрес
https://www.litres.ru/podcast/luangta-narongsak-khinalayo/besedy-o-dhamme-73984137
Яндекс.Музыка
https://music.yandex.ru/album/42296829
VK аудио
https://vk.ru/audios-234496265
Поддержать оплату сервисов, позволяющих загружать и хранить аудио можно по номеру телефона +79857604331 на Т-банк, пол…
Почему нет «я», которому не удаётся постичь Ниббану? Потому что, когда «я думаю о Ниббане», каждая эта мысль возникает и исчезает.
Когда я думаю: «Я не постигну Ниббану», - эта мысль тоже возникает и исчезает. Следовательно, нет «я», которому не удаётся постичь Ниббану.
Подробнее — в новой беседе Луангта "Просто поток причин и условий".
«Люди не понимают пример с подбрасываемой тряпкой. Они не понимают, что вещь появляется из небытия, проявляется в бытии, а затем возвращается к небытию. Вместо этого люди цепляются за само небытие и лелеют желание его обрести.
Но суть не в этом. Изначально тряпки не было. Затем тряпка появилась. И потом снова исчезла в небытии. Всё начинается с небытия: ничего не было, но вот что-то проявляется…»
Сегодня официальны…
Из беседы под названием «Айсберг»,
полная версия (2,5 минуты) здесь:
Rutube: https://rutube.ru/video/d0fedc43155624d2722a2b9d422f5455/
VK: https://vkvideo.ru/video-234496265_456239043
«Нет того, кто цепляется за пустоту. Потому что мысли и чувства, которые составляют наше «я», это лишь пылинки во Вселенной.
И эти пылинки дерзают цепляться за пустоту бесконечной Вселенной. Какая непомерная гордыня!»
Полная беседа в видео-формате (9 минут) по ссылкам:
VK: https://vk.ru/video-234496265_456239058
Rutube: https://rutube.ru/video/492dfc5ad5d011222490f0c61558ccd1/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @luangtanarongsak_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Луангта Наронгсак Кхиналайо 🇹🇭” (@luangtanarongsak_ru), 767 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luangtanarongsak_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.