Channel
@ls_franch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002552054719 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ls_franch |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 19 April 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ls_franch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 35 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 35 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 34 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 19 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 27 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 13.0% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 9.26% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 7.41% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2025 to 13 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Туле, на регулярной основе отсутствует мобильный интернет, из-за чего даже самые качественные визуалы работают крайне непосредственно, если не сказать что хуёво. Я сейчас активно занят вопросом включения кросс-маркетинга, чтобы пока таргет ебланин, в оффлайне партнёры раздавали наши купоны клиентам, возможно на этой неделе они уже будут отпечатаны, на следующей неделе поеду в Тулу снова. Нужно срочно диверсифицир…
❤2🔥2✍1👍1🤔1
Считаем первые итоги квартала: 1. Апрель 2025 (3 дня): 29.920 рублей. 2. Май 2025: 103.346,63 рублей. 3. Июнь 2025: 183.391 рубль. 4. Июль 2025: 283.153,71 рублей. Есть тенденция роста, это радует ❤️ Из позитивных новостей: салон сам себя окупает практически в ноль, по-хорошему выход в ноль идёт где-то примерно на 400.000 руб, но это прямо при супер правильном подсчёте)) Идём уверенными шагами к этой цифре, скоро…
🔥8🍾3👏2⚡1
Проработали вывеску, пришлось немного корректировать под общий фирменный стиль локации, так как у нас в целом нет белого цвета, но вроде выглядит миленько 🥰 В первую неделю июля оборот стал: 100к, чтобы добиться наших целей, нужно усиливать объём лидогенерации сейчас. На данный момент: Тулу глушат из-за ударов беспилотников, бывает так что даже нету мобильной связи, это означает то, что людям труднее написать нам и…
🔥4🗿2❤1
Чтобы достигнуть оборота в 1,5 млн руб в месяц на одной точке, нужно тратить на рекламную активность около 150.000 — 175.000 руб в месяц. Сегодня я пришёл к выводу, что физически только таргет такой объём денег ежемесячно, при этом не выжигая рынок (объём целевой аудитории региона в среднем 50-55.000 человек), не вывезет. Потолок на таргет который можно тратить, при этом не теряя конечную стоимость заявки в долгую,…
❤2🤔2🔥1
Так. Давайте по порядку, я немного подпроебался, т.к. ушел в работу с головой, постараюсь быть системнее!) Подвожу итоги апреля: Это было ахуенно. Я безумно благодарен всем за поддержку, тем кто написал или физически поддержал, особенно своего бизнес-отца @lokoncev42, который не только советом помог, но и деньгами в трудный период, Лёха, обнял ❤️ Как я и говорил в предыдущем посте, я прилетел в Тулу 22 апреля, на …
🔥8🍾2❤1
Скоро возвращаюсь в Тулу, уже в этот вторник буду там, денег нет, пришлось брать денежку на самолёт в долг + мы вышли за рамки планового бюджета (изначально планировалось на 400к), ещё надо сгенерировать 180 тысяч допом. Также есть рабочие обязательства и долги перед командой, в общем жонглируем настолько, насколько возможно 😅 Ладно, это временные трудности, сейчас занимаюсь активной подготовкой, маркетинг открытия…
🔥4⚡3👍2❤1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ls_franch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,191,181 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бизнес на отбеливании | LOVE SMILE” (@ls_franch), 35 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ls_franch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.