Channel
@lovushka_design
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
706subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001449232345 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lovushka_design |
| Description | О дизайне для тех, кто только-только. И не только. По всяким делам в личку: @levalovushka |
| Created | 25 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lovushka_design |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 706 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 706 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
288 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 127 | 44.1% | |
| ❤ | 93 | 32.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 48 | 16.7% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 3.47% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 1.39% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.347% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.347% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.347% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2025 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вы же идёте на Кайференцию? В прошлом году было восхитительно, редкий случай не удушающей дизайн-конфы, плюс самое место чтобы зазнакомиться с клёвыми дизайнерами и директорами. Лекции, тусовка, диджеи, оупен майк, дизайн-битва. Ну и вина вместе попьем на террасе. Что ещё нужно вообще для хороших выходных. Организовал для вас промокодик специальный по этому случаю: LOVUSHKA20, чтобы не затратно было. Приезжайте!
❤🔥12
Блин, мне не нравится что весь канал теперь состоит из анонсов и всякой медиа-активности, но вот мы с Сережей Мекрюковым поотвечали на всякие вопросы про эмоциональный дизайн для Тильды Эдюкейшен. Прикольно, вроде! https://tilda.education/emotional-design
❤13🔥7❤🔥2👎1
Первый премьерный закрытый анонс для ранних пташек Приглашаем на Сбер Дизайн Фест, очно и онлайн 15 июня. В программе — 6 выступлений от спикеров из Сбера, СберМаркетинга, Pragmatica, RDMI, Skillbox и СберАвто. Обсудим как применять искусственный интеллект в реальной работе, а не в теории, как меняется роль дизайнера и какое мышление помогает проходить через вызовы и изменения 2026 года. 📆 15 июня, 18:00 📍 Москв…
🔥6❤🔥2🎉1
Буду там выступать, приколитесь
❤5❤🔥1🔥1
Было клёво! На два дня аж гоняли спецотрядом в Москву раскрутить МТС. Зовите! Порисуем.
❤1❤🔥1
на воркшопе с дизайн командой из мтс финтех разработали идеи для сайтов «мтс банк» и «мтс деньги» два дня, 20+ дизайнеров из мтс, 5 человек от нас и задача: новый формат навигации главной страницы, который будет отражать реальные потребности клиента, а не продуктовую линейку на выходе получилось пять концептов – отдельное место в сердечке отдали тиндер-механике. в финтехе, где интерфейсы обычно строгие как налогова…
❤7🔥7
хоба! первый опыт прям записи в домашних условиях
❤🔥2🎉1🔥1
если собираетесь на наш бесплатный воркшоп по вайбкодингу во вторник, вот вам способ изучить базу: продуктовый лид ⚪️ лёва сделал видео на ютуб, где за несколько шагов с помощью вайбкодинга собирает эффект для сайта. на практике показал путь от макета в Figma до готового для шера с друзьями эффекта на Netlify — это без единой строчки кода вручную. пайплайн такой: макет в Figma → спека через Claude → план в Cursor …
🔥17❤2❤🔥1
Сейчас начнём кстати! Залетайте в зумчик.
🔥3❤🔥1🎉1
О чем было бы интереснее посмотреть или почитать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1❤🔥1
Скоро буду писать видео-туториал по вайбкодингу для концептинга и прототипирования интерфейсов. Хочу понять, про что вам было бы прикольнее посмотреть? Пока думаю пробежаться по созданию такой штуки на вебе. Фигма → PRD с Claude → Cursor. Хочется по вершкам охватить весь пайплайн, которым чаще всего пользуемся в Прагматике. А может это слишком сложно? Или наоборот, я всё проспал и все уже это умеют за пару часиков …
🔥20❤6❤🔥1
Приходите!
❤🔥2❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lovushka_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
О чем было бы интереснее посмотреть или почитать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2025 to 7 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 64,823 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ловушка” (@lovushka_design), 706 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lovushka_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.