Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Love Generation

Channel

Love Generation

@lovegenerationbeauty

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,362subscribers

-2,835 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002142044003
TypeChannel
Username@lovegenerationbeauty
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lovegenerationbeauty

Growth

14,35917,20415,781.56 August 2026 — 17,197 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,204 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,119 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,096 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,116 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,109 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,103 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,104 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,308 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,359 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,362 subscribers14,3626 August 202618 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 12 days, net -2,835. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,932–17,631 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 00:0614,362+3
16 Aug 2026, 22:2614,359-1,949
15 Aug 2026, 19:4416,308-796
14 Aug 2026, 05:4917,104+1
12 Aug 2026, 21:0817,103-6
11 Aug 2026, 21:5117,109-7
11 Aug 2026, 01:0217,116+20
8 Aug 2026, 21:1817,096-23
7 Aug 2026, 20:2017,119-85
6 Aug 2026, 21:5717,204+7
6 Aug 2026, 09:0417,197first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 14,362 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,830
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held27 (17 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total43,926
Reactions total2,326
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
861
Videos
296
Links
178

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,597 reactions across 27 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,72266.3%
🥰44016.9%
🤩2409.24%
💅1957.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,597reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC523 views45 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

25🤩13🥰7

17 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC523 views50 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Бьюти-совет: если совсем нет времени, используй стойкий тинт для губ, чтобы сделать трендовый мономакияж и освежить лицо ❤️

35🥰8🤩7

16 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,060 views244 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Карусель, карусель, кто успел — тот участвует в конкурсе 🎠 Условия простые: 1. Быть подписанной на наш канал. 2. Остановить GIF на обозначенном продукте. 3. Прислать скриншот в комментарии к этому посту. 31 августа рандомайзер определит 3 победителей, которые получат топовые продукты от Love Generation. Желаем тебе удачи и быстрой реакции 🤍 Полные правила — тут.

169🤩49🥰26

12 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,660 views95 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

65🥰22🤩8

12 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,570 views51 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Готовы слушать эти звуки вечно 🤭

44🤩7

11 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,670 views56 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

45🥰11

11 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,770 views71 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Некоторые продукты как спасательный круг — без них невозможно представить лето. Делись в комментариях своими незаменимыми любимчиками от нашего бренда 💛

57🥰14

10 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,710 views61 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰3319🤩9

10 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,530 views59 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Знаешь, чем хорош тинт I'm h*rny? 💖 Стойкой, комфортной текстурой с влажным финишем в семи оттенках и двух вариантах: жидкая формула для более естественного цвета и кремовая — для тех, кто любит поярче. А какой вариант выбираешь ты? 🫦

49🤩10

9 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,920 views112 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Главное слово для твоего бьюти-сезона — Check 💜 Наша новая линейка продуктов, куда вошли три универсальных оттенка румян, два оттенка хайлайтера и контуринг. Ставь галочки в своём списке безупречности: щёчки игриво горят, скулы волшебным образом проявились, а свет поймал тебя в самом выгодном ракурсе. Пиши в комментариях, какой продукт попробуешь первым 🫶

80💅26🤩6

8 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,560 views76 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Красивый глянцевый финиш, лёгкая тушёвка и универсальная палитра, чтобы ты оказалась на седьмом небе от счастья 💖 Какой оттенок румян Cheek Slime выбираешь?

76

7 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,730 views83 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Благодаря вашим фотографиям наша команда убедилась: дружба действительно существует 💜 Спасибо вам за такой поток позитива! Победителями становятся: @ANGE77AA @Niko_chkaaa0 @malcolm_br1ght Поздравляем! Напишите нам в личные сообщения, чтобы получить свой подарок. Желаем каждой пронести настоящую дружбу через всю жизнь 🌸

53🥰19🤩11

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @lovegenerationbeauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 182,405 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FOR ME
@forme · 113,598
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Love Generation” (@lovegenerationbeauty), 14,362 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lovegenerationbeauty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.