Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лови мысль

Channel

Лови мысль

@loveemysl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

121subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002058638511
TypeChannel
Username@loveemysl
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/loveemysl

Growth

120121120.56 August 2026 — 120 subscribers9 August 2026 — 120 subscribers25 August 2026 — 121 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 19 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 20:33121+1
9 Aug 2026, 04:16120no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:30120first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2142.0%
🔥1224.0%
👍1122.0%
🙏36.00%
24.00%
😢12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @loveemysl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 February 2026 to 25 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Mar 2026, 15:35 UTC155 viewsread 9 August 2026

За нашими эмоциями стоят наши потребности. Чем лучше и быстрее мы их распознаём — тем легче понять, чего мы хотим и реализовать это.

18 Mar 2026, 15:33 UTC136 views6 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Шпаргалка для распознавания своих эмоций

🔥6

11 Mar 2026, 08:45 UTC133 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вы прошли тест Бека? Если нет — пройдите. И вот вам сразу рекомендации Важно: Тест Бека не диагноз, а ориентир для понимания своего состояния. Посмотрим, как можно помогать себе на каждом уровне. 0–9 — депрессивных симптомов нет Это нормальное состояние психики. Но даже здесь важно поддерживать ресурс, чтобы не уходить в перегрузку. Что помогает: — стабильный сон — регулярное движение (хотя бы прогулки) — жив

👍5

10 Mar 2026, 10:29 UTC92 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Весна — время, когда у многих начинается то самое «весеннее обострение». Эмоции могут скакать: тревога, усталость, раздражение, пустота. Плюс новости, события в мире, куча информации — и иногда становится сложно понять, что именно происходит со мной, а что просто фоновый шум вокруг. Иногда полезно остановиться и немного «проверить себя». Для этого можно пройти тест Бека на депрессию. Это короткий психологический оп

🙏3

7 Mar 2026, 17:34 UTC92 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Дорогой мой читатель, Предлагаю сделать небольшую паузу в изучении защитных механизмов. Как минимум — потому что информации уже много, и ей нужно время, чтобы усвоиться. А как максимум — потому что может подняться сильное сопротивление и нежелание двигаться дальше. Так вот. В преддверии праздников, к которым мы так любим привязывать смыслы и ожидания, предлагаю одно упражнение — маленькую практику. Она очень прос

10👍1

2 Mar 2026, 17:52 UTC99 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Квиз: Где здесь ретрофлексия? Выберите, в какой ситуации человек направляет эмоции не наружу, а на себя. (Возможны более чем 1 вариант) Кейс 1 Женщина злится на партнёра, но вместо разговора начинает молчать, винить себя и думать: «Наверное, я слишком требовательная». Кейс 2 Мужчина раздражён коллегой и прямо говорит: «Мне не подходит такой формат работы, давай обсудим». Кейс 3 После конфликта девушка чувств

🔥21😢1

2 Mar 2026, 17:27 UTC90 viewsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

РЕТРОФЛЕКСИЯ (Поворот против себя)

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @loveemysl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Feb 2026, 17:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz24 voters

Женщине делают комплимент: «Ты сегодня очень красиво выглядишь». Она отвечает: «Да нет, это обычное платье, ничего особенного».

  1. Обесценивание96%
  2. Рационализация4%
  3. Регресс0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Feb 2026, 17:27 UTCAnonymous Quiz25 voters

На важном собеседовании девушка сильно нервничает. Во время разговора она часто улыбается, играет волосами, слегка наклоняется к интервьюеру и делает лёгкие шутки.

  1. Идеализация12%
  2. Сексуализация72%
  3. Регресс16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 25 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 528,595 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лови мысль” (@loveemysl), 121 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loveemysl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.