Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net +71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 303–400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 16:37
385
-4
29 Aug 2026, 22:39
389
+72
23 Aug 2026, 04:33
317
+3
8 Aug 2026, 07:35
314
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:03
314
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
32s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
77 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
31
40.3%
🔥
12
15.6%
👍
11
14.3%
❤🔥
7
9.09%
😍
5
6.49%
💯
3
3.90%
🤯
2
2.60%
🥰
2
2.60%
👀
1
1.30%
👾
1
1.30%
🙏
1
1.30%
🤣
1
1.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что происходит в моей жизни в последнее время (цели, планы, вызовы)53%
The shares total 235%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Увлеклась красочным летом и подзабросила канал.)
А между тем есть так много тем, которыми хочется с вами поделиться!
Предлагаю голосовать 👇
(Кто знает, какое съедобное растение на первом фото в качестве зонта?)
Радость-радость)))
Мы ходили на гончарный МК (https://t.me/lovebyzlata/590), но я вам так и не показала, что получилось! А между тем эта лиса радует меня невероятно!
Никогда бы не подумала, что это такой кайф - касаться предмета, созданного тобой вручную с любовью от начала до конца ❤️
Вы только посмотрите, какая красота получилась 😍 Нравится?)
Правда по цвету меня обманули, и получилась не оранжевая лиса, а розов…
На меня наехала знакомая. «Раз ты специалист по отношениям, то у тебя должны быть хорошие отношения СО ВСЕМИ!» - сказала мне она.
Она услышала, что у меня не очень хорошие отношения с сестрой.
Сестра меня заблокировала и не хочет больше видеть.
Кто слышит, спрашивают, а что случилось-то?
Дело было в начале декабря, когда мы отмечали мой День рождения вместе с семьей. Собрались я, мама, папа, Ваня (мой муж) и сест…
Идеальный день - наше прошлое воскресенье.
С утра часовая прогулка по лесу и садоводству, витаминный завтрак из ирги, малины и черники. Потом обычный завтрак в кругу семьи, и отправляемся в город - День с любимым мужем!
Прогулка к остановке за разговором. Ваня рыцарски перенес меня через лужу))
В городе выбрали красивые тетради для обучения. Посидели в Хлебнике с айс кофе. Забрали заказ с Авито.
Купили вкуснях на…
Итак, свершилось!
Я накопила достаточно энергии (и уверенности) и приглашаю вас в личную работу!
Что это будет?
Глубокая сессия один на один с вами и вашим запросом. Мы вместе найдём ответы, чтобы вы перестали ходить по кругу в отношениях.
Я прошла через океан боли и ошибок, чтобы прийти к своим идеальным отношениям с Ваней (да, счастливые отношения существуют, и я тому живой пример).
Я прекрасно умею слушать, зна…
Иметь рядом мужчину и быть по-настоящему в отношениях - не одно и то же. И, пожалуй, одна из самых болезненных вещей - понять это слишком поздно.
Нас долго учили ценить сам факт того, что рядом кто-то есть. Терпеть. Не требовать большего. Убеждать себя, что близость - это роскошь, а одиночество внутри семьи - почти норма.
Но кольцо на пальце не заменяет поддержку, совместные фотографии не заменяют заботу, а статус …
❤7💯2🔥2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @lovebyzlata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что происходит в моей жизни в последнее время (цели, планы, вызовы)53%
The shares total 235%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Злата о любви” (@lovebyzlata), 385 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lovebyzlata.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
