Channel
@love_M0
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
805subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001122272454 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @love_M0 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 16 July 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/love_M0 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @love_M0/1741 · this entry27 Mar 2018, 13:03 UTC | @y666y/303727 Mar 2018, 13:04 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @y666y/304930 Mar 2018, 15:20 UTC | @love_M0/1752 · this entry30 Mar 2018, 15:23 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @love_M0/1842 · this entry29 Apr 2018, 11:49 UTC | @y666y/316929 Apr 2018, 11:49 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @love_M0/2861 · this entry2 Apr 2019, 13:02 UTC | @y666y/45282 Apr 2019, 13:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @love_M0/4496 · this entry30 Sept 2020, 13:07 UTC | @y666y/681430 Sept 2020, 13:18 UTC | 1.00 | 11 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @y666y | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 July 2017 to 3 June 2021. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @love_M0 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 805 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 806 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 806 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2017 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
66k @subscribe فكر شارد @tsk3tBc تسكعات فكرية @T_stories رواية @Awja3i اوجاعي @wt2an فتاه 6k @shaa3r_alhyah شاعر الحياة @i3lan_qanawat منوعات @jjo69 شعر وخواطر 4k @english_speakers ايلتس @medicalnotesdaily طبيه @androidfirst apkبرامج @Althkra2 ذكرى للنساء @tatweirco تطويرذات @agliy بنت عشرينية 3k @dimebitcoin اربح اموال من الانترنت @abtsamtk نكت بعد القات @ipastore تكرار تطبيقات @B_W_B احببتك بصمت @lulelqsed ليل …
17k @itrafat إعترافات بنات 62k @subscribe فكر شارد 8k @halatwha حالات واتساب @Althkra2 ذكرى للنساء 6k @shaa3r_alhyah شاعر حياة @ahlamoona وروايات @arb_app تطبيقات @teleg333 قنوات 4k @dimebitcoin اربح بتكوين ومال @Android_new1 برامج @Mm7mud مصطفى 3k @matba5 وظائف الخليج @love_M0 حبي الرسول @pictore صور وصور @mkoij روائع روعة @Rwaae3 انثى @AIiAI الحياة 2k @nukat44 كوكب ضحك @kallimmat مؤثرة 2k @MemoriesPrincesses …
34k @Subahiat3 صباحيات 60k @subscribe فكر شارد 8k @halatwha حالات واتساب @alshaamk1 نبع القوافي @Althkra2 ذكرى للنساء 6k @shaa3r_alhyah شاعر حياة @english2011 تعلم انجليزي @ahlamoona وروايات @arb_app تطبيقات @teleg333 قنوات 4k @dimebitcoin اربح بتكوين ومال @Android_new1 برامج @Mm7mud مصطفى @e3ojs صور وحالات @Raqt_lee راقت لي 3k @matba5 وظائف الخليج @love_M0 حبي الرسول @ssupportive لنفسي @pictore صور وصور @mkoij ر…
29k @kyalat_ftah صور وحالات واتس 20k @qqxxpp متعة بصرية 40k @subscribe فكر شارد 17k @osrtygnty زوجية 8k @EN4YOU تعلم الانجليزية @F666K كتابات قصيرة @tsk3tBc تسكعات 7k @T_stories قصص ورايات @shayma0 شيء ما @Awja3i اوجاعي 5k @medicalnotesdaily طبيه @androidfirst apkبرامج @Althkra2 ذكرى للنساء @jjo69 شعر وخواطر @Storyss قصص 3k @english_speakers توفل وايلتس @shaa3r_alhyah شاعر الحياة @nukat_falh جنة الارض تركيا @al_…
27k @kyalat_ftah صور وحالات واتس 36k @subscribe فكر شارد 16k @itrafat إعترافات بنات فقط 16k @nukat اضحك من قلبك 10k @momaty نبض قلبي @turkhak العاب 5k @alshaamk1 شعر والخواطر @ahlamoona كتب وروايات @Ahlamiid حكاية حبي @Althkra2 ذكرى للنساء @arb_app تطبيقات 3k @shaa3r_alhyah شاعر حياة @Android_new1 تطبيقات @Althkra1 الذكرى تنفع @teleg333 قنوات @Rwaae3 انثى 2k @english2011 تعلم الانجليزي @Mm7mud مصطفى محمود @matba…
تجربة..
27k @kyalat_ftah صور وحالات واتس 36k @subscribe فكر شارد 16k @itrafat إعترافات بنات فقط 16k @nukat اضحك من قلبك 10k @momaty نبض قلبي @turkhak العاب 5k @alshaamk1 شعر والخواطر @ahlamoona كتب وروايات @tawaf100 قصة وصورة @Ahlamiid حكاية حبي @Althkra2 ذكرى للنساء @arb_app تطبيقات 3k @shaa3r_alhyah شاعر حياة @Android_new1 تطبيقات @Althkra1 الذكرى تنفع @teleg333 قنوات @Rwaae3 انثى 2k @english2011 تعلم الانجليزي @Mm7mu…
25k @kyalat_ftah صور وحالات واتس 32k @subscribe فكر شارد 16k @itrafat إعترافات بنات فقط 16k @nukat اضحك من قلبك 10k @momaty نبض قلبي @turkhak العاب 5k @alshaamk1 شعر والخواطر @ahlamoona كتب وروايات @tawaf100 قصة وصورة @Ahlamiid حكاية حبي @Althkra2 ذكرى للنساء @arb_app تطبيقات 3k @shaa3r_alhyah شاعر حياة @Android_new1 تطبيقات @Althkra1 الذكرى تنفع @teleg333 قنوات @Rwaae3 انثى 2k @english2011 تعلم الانجليزي @Mm7mu…
12:00⇅ الحـمدلله علئ فـرحہه ما تنـوصصف 🍁😴 |-)<
صَلِّي على النَبي ومَررها 🌸#.
ۭ↶ اللهم صـل علێ سـيدنا محمداً وآله وصحبه وسلم تسليماً كــثيرا💭🌸 💓┇ @love_M0
ۭ↶ #مـا_نهئ_عـنه_النبي_صل_الله_علـيه_وسلـم - 💭✨ بـاب حـفظ اللسـان 🍃 عـن ابي بكـر الصـديق - رضـي الله عنه - ان الرسـول - صـل الله عليه وسلـم - قـال يـوم النحـر بمنئ في خـطبه الوداع : « ان دمـاءكـم، وامـوالكـم، واعـراضكم، حـرام عـليكم كـ حـرمه يـومكم هـذا، في شهـركم هـذا، في بـلدكم هـذا، الا هـل بلـغت » #متفق_عليه 🌸 💓┇ @love_M0
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @love_M0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 857,993 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@love_M0 named 63 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
13 more handles are in this same list but not shown individually here — capped at 50.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اۧحۭۤـب۪كۦ يۭاﹶ رؕسـۤۤولۖ الله ف۪هلؒ تقۣبلۡ❥❥” (@love_M0), 805 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/love_M0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.