20 Jul 2026, 01:17 UTC826 viewsread 10 August 2026
54
Channel
萝莉社
@lote158
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
88subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003009669581 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lote158 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 19 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lote158 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 88 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 90 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 89 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 89 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 19 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 938.6%
- avg views ÷ 88 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 826
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (19 September 2025 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 826 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
29 Jun 2026, 03:35 UTC846 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @CaoPing_GuanFang
各位狼友： 在这个行业环境日益混乱的当下，我希望打破飞机信息壁垒，摒弃虚假与操控，用扁平、平等、透明的方式重新连接每一个人。 这里没有高高在上的把关者，只有人人为我，我为人人的真诚共同体。 知名狼友与热门老师并肩，大家一起建频道、写报告、聊真实体验；老师可以亲自发声，狼友可以客观记录。我们共同甄别真伪，让每一条信息都经得起群众的眼睛。 本频道内容为成都楼凤报告查询机器人（@reviews_seeker_bot）获取的数据统计与深度分析，欢迎大家随时使用机器人查询报告，并监督数据的可靠性。 我们的使命： 汇集电报海量冶游信息，借助每一位参与者的力量，从群众中来，到群众中去！ 欢迎每一位追求真实体验狼友加入！
29 Jun 2026, 03:34 UTC855 viewsread 10 August 2026
54
23 Apr 2026, 03:01 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 10 August 2026
9
19 Sept 2025, 01:43 UTCviews —
Messages in this channel will no longer be automatically deleted
19 Sept 2025, 01:42 UTCviews —
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 day
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @lote158. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,120,248 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“萝莉社” (@lote158), 88 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lote158.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.