Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

тред на лост энланд

@lostenlandthread

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

359subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003984575503
TypeChannel
Username@lostenlandthread
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 12 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lostenlandthread

Growth

35913 Aug 2026, 06:01 — 359 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 08:04 — 359 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 06:0113 Aug 2026, 08:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 358–360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:04359no change
13 Aug 2026, 06:01359first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
200.2%
avg views ÷ 359 subscribers
Avg views / post
719
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (12 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total5,031
Reactions total354
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

728 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28839.6%
🤡12216.8%
💘8311.4%
👎618.38%
🔥324.40%
🥰283.85%
🌚243.30%
🤔202.75%
👏162.20%
😨121.65%
🍓111.51%
💩81.10%
🤬81.10%
🤓50.687%
❤‍🔥30.412%
👍30.412%
💯20.275%
🗿20.275%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 728reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC388 views66 reactionsread 13 August 2026

а что вы ожидали от тех, кто осуждал рики за любовь к Майклу Джексону? :)

54🌚11❤‍🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC884 views54 reactionsread 13 August 2026

я тоже захотела рассказать один случай🥺 наверное чуть меньше года назад я наткнулась на тгк с дипфейками айдолов, где энха тоже присутствовали,а в частности хисын я писала об этом в анон энланда,что бы на этот канал накидали жалоб,но это сообщение полностью проигнорировали😬

33💘11🤬8🍓2

22 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC854 views64 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте!! Хочу рассказать ситуацию,надеюсь поймут. Я только сегодня слава богу нашел полный тред на эту хуйню. Не знаю упомянули тут или нет, но админы не в состоянии вести тгк. Я говорю о том, что им от силы 13 лет, они не могут даже собственным правилам придерживаться. Когда я сказала, что думаю, что чонвон в какой то степени на эфире скзаал с помощью компания на меня это стадо нищих абортышей налетело, со сло

40🔥13💘11

21 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC707 views59 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/bambi_hee_01/3768 да

🤡45😨122

18 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC790 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://t.me/c/4291487043/4460 Маринка, которая шутит про мусульман и свинок))

22💘6🥰3

18 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC726 views30 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ребят щас без срачки насчет футболки понятно

23🔥4👍2🍓1

18 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC682 views50 reactionsread 13 August 2026

вам не кажется смешным, как админки лост энланда высказываются насчет футболки чонвона с боратом, в то время как они являются конченными ксенофобками like и ВЫ будете что-то говорить про оскорбление народа😭😭

39💘7🍓4

12 Jul 2026, 19:10 UTC866 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026

нууу думайте сами ребят

21

12 Jul 2026, 19:10 UTC876 views43 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤡383🗿2

12 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC787 views47 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👎33🤡9🤓5

12 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC673 views59 reactionsread 13 August 2026

напомню девка пишет себе в канал «очень сильно ненавижу мразот которые пишут гадости чонвону» при этом сама пишет вещи не лучше про хисына

💘35🌚137🍓2💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lostenlandthread. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 605,316 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“тред на лост энланд” (@lostenlandthread), 359 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lostenlandthread.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.