Π½Π΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡΡ Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡ ΡΡ Π²Π·ΡΠΎΡΠ»Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π»Π°
Signed ΠΏΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ°

Channel
@lorenskievirt
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
45subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001704676756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lorenskievirt |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 21 September 2022β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lorenskievirt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 45 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 45 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 September 2022 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
212 reactions across 14 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 48 | 22.6% | |
| π | 27 | 12.7% | |
| π₯ | 23 | 10.8% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 22 | 10.4% | |
| π | 17 | 8.02% | |
| π | 16 | 7.55% | |
| β‘ | 12 | 5.66% | |
| π¦ | 7 | 3.30% | |
| π | 6 | 2.83% | |
| πΎ | 6 | 2.83% | |
| π | 6 | 2.83% | |
| π₯΄ | 4 | 1.89% | |
| π | 3 | 1.42% | |
| π³ | 3 | 1.42% | |
| πΎ | 3 | 1.42% | |
| π | 2 | 0.943% | |
| π | 2 | 0.943% | |
| π | 1 | 0.472% | |
| π― | 1 | 0.472% | |
| π | 1 | 0.472% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2022 to 26 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Π½Π΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡΡ Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡ ΡΡ Π²Π·ΡΠΎΡΠ»Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π»Π°
Signed ΠΏΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ°
Π΄ΡΡΠ·ΡΡ Ρ ΡΠ°Ρ Π² Π²ΠΈΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡΡ
Signed ΠΏΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ°
Photo, posted without a caption
π1
Signed ΠΏΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ°
ΠΠΎΡΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌ Π»ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Signed ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ.
Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Π²Π»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌ Π»ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π±ΡΡΠ°
Signed ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ.
Π²ΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π° ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°
β€1
Signed ᴨα΄α΄¨α΄α΄ Κ³ΚΈαΆ«
Photo, posted without a caption
β€βπ₯2π₯2β‘1π1π1πΎ1π1π1
Signed ᴨα΄α΄¨α΄α΄.
Photo, posted without a caption
β‘2β€2β€βπ₯2π1π1π1π1π₯1
Signed ᴨα΄α΄¨α΄α΄. #0113
Π²Ρ Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΌΠ°ΠΉΡΠ΅,ΠΊΠ°ΠΉΠ»Π° Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Ρππ #πππππ
β‘3β€βπ₯2π1π1π¦1
cr: @faerk1sss #πππππ
π4β€2β€βπ₯2π2π¦2π1π1
ππ€πͺπ₯Έπ₯Ίπ€₯π€πππ€₯ π€¨π€π ππ¬π€ͺππ€¨π€π π¦
β€βπ₯4π¦3β€1
Signed π'ππ
cr: Π²Π»Π°Π΄ΠΈΡΠ»Π°Π² Π³Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ #πππππ
π5πΎ2β‘1β€1β€βπ₯1π1πΎ1π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lorenskievirt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Π²Π°Ρ Π»ΡΠ±ΠΈΠΌΡΠΉ Π²ΠΊΡΡ ΡΠ°Ρ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2022 to 26 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 1,463,382 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππππππ ||| π.π πππππβ (@lorenskievirt), 45 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lorenskievirt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.