I » Family Intel: - Mother: Elena Mihai – lives in Buzău at a different address (Strada Unirii nr. 12) – confirmed via utility bills - Father: deceased – no further records - Brother: Ionut Mihai – a mechanic in Buzău – age 27 – no known involvement in illegal activities - Axee claims on Telegram to live in Bucharest (Militari district), but our geolocation places him in Buzău; this is a deliberate de…
Channel
leak
@lorebook179inferno
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004455108121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lorebook179inferno |
| Created | 17 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lorebook179inferno |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 6 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 5 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 311.1%
- avg views ÷ 6 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 18.7
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (17 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 112 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
» Telegram: @keys_179 – created 2023-08-15 – active in crypto and carding groups » Activity: - Handles all crypto conversions for the group – converts illicit proceeds into Monero and Bitcoin - Manages the group's shared wallet (0x9aF4...B3c8) – which has received approximately 120 transactions since 2025 - Linked to an NFT scam in late 2025 involving a fake "Romanian Heritage" collection – defrauded 34 v…
» Real Name: unknown – likely teenager from Iași (based on his use of local slang) » Activity: Monitor law enforcement chatter – alerts members when discussions involve "DIICOT" or "police" » Threat Assessment: LOW – lookout. ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── SUBJECT 13: ink ─────────────────────────────── » Alias: ink » Real Name: unknown – freelance graphic designer » Activity: Creates …
Their primary threat lies in harassment and reputation damage rather than direct financial theft. However, their potential for escalation (swatting, physical intimidation) warrants immediate action. The individuals listed above are considered subjects of an ongoing international investigation. This bulletin provides sufficient evidence to initiate legal proceedings and preventive measures. All individuals named here…
================================================================ = TOP SECRET // NOFORN – FBI CYBER DIVISION = = JOINT INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN – U.S. SECRET SERVICE = = OPERATION "GHOSTDOX" – TARGET: ROMANIAN DOXXING COLLECTIVE "179" = DATE: 17 AUGUST 2026 – EDR REF: FBI-2026-08-17-179 = = CLASSIFICATION: STRICT CONFIDENTIAL – LAW ENFORCEMENT ONLY = = DISTRIBUTION: FBI (HQ), USSS (HQ…
- Device 2: Samsung Galaxy S23 (Phantom Black) – IMEI 356789012345679 – MAC 3C:22:FB:4A:6B:9D – Android 13 – Google account: [email protected] - Device 3: Lenovo ThinkPad E15 (2022 model) – Windows 11 Pro – MAC 00:1A:2B:3C:4D:5E – Serial #PF‑3Y9V2J – joined to a local workgroup - Device 4: Custom Desktop PC – ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 motherboard – Intel i9‑12900K – RTX 3080 – MAC 1A:2B:3C:4D:5E:6F – Window…
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @lorebook179inferno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@lorebook179inferno named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“leak” (@lorebook179inferno), 6 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lorebook179inferno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.