«او به هیچ مدرسهای، به هیچ کلیسایی، به هیچ نهادی، به هیچ آکادمی، و به هیچ رژیمی تعلق نداشت به جز رژیم آزادی» Gustave Courbet #گوستاو_كوربه 1819-1877 @lorca1871
❤5👏1
Signed Ɓorhaŋ

Channel
@lorca1871
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
580subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001079262982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lorca1871 |
| Description | بگذاريد كتاب ها ما را بخوانند 🦋 📦 ارسال پستى به سراسر كشور. 📍آدرسِ لوركا: مريوان، بالاتر از چهار راە اصلی، سمت چپ، كافه كتاب لوركا اينستاگرامِ لوركا: https://instagram.com/lorca.bookshop @Borhan1871 ارتباط با ادمين 📝 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lorca1871 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:20 | 580 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 580 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 December 2025 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 997 |
| Reactions total | 71 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
270 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 107 | 39.6% | |
| 😢 | 39 | 14.4% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 13.0% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 7.04% | |
| 😭 | 18 | 6.67% | |
| 🕊 | 11 | 4.07% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 2.59% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 2.59% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 2.59% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.85% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.11% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 1.11% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.741% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.741% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.741% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.37% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.37% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 270reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«او به هیچ مدرسهای، به هیچ کلیسایی، به هیچ نهادی، به هیچ آکادمی، و به هیچ رژیمی تعلق نداشت به جز رژیم آزادی» Gustave Courbet #گوستاو_كوربه 1819-1877 @lorca1871
❤5👏1
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
ما در دلتنگی دستی نداشتیم و در فاصلهای که داشتیم، هزار دست داشتیم! سلام بر تو که حقیقتاً دلتنگِ تواَم و سلام بر من برای آنکه دلتنگم ... ❤️🖤👑 #مادر @Lorca1871
❤21😭5😢4🔥1
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
دل من و این تلخی بینهایت سرچشمهاش کجاست؟ لورکا @Lorca1871
❤9😭4🍓1
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
___ - چه خبر؟ + هیچی، دارم چایی میخورم ): @Lorca1871
❤14👍2👏2🍓1🙏1
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
کتاب «دروغهایی که به خود میگوییم» خوانش گروهی و تحلیلی در کنار خواندن گروهی این کتاب، تلاش میکنیم به تجربههای درونی، احساسات و واکنشهایی توجه کنیم که مواجهه با متن در ما برمیانگیزد. تجربههایی که گاه آشنا اما نادیدهگرفتهشدهاند و میتوانند دریچهای برای شناخت عمیقتر خود باشند. در فضایی مشارکتی و تأملمحور، درباره خودفریبی، شیوههای اجتناب از احساسات دشوار و امکان مواجهه صادقانهتر با تجربههای درونی گفتو…
❤8🍓1
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
آه خون سخت خوزه آرکادیو! آه بلبلهاى رگهايش!
😢9🕊5❤4😭2🌚1👏1
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
ناگهان خوزه آرکادیو با گلوله کشته می شود، اما مرگش مثل مرگ آدم های معمولی نیست.خون او راه می افتد.نه فوران می کند نه می پاشد، راه می رود. خون از زیر در می لغزد. از کوچه و خیابان می گذرد. پیچ وخم می خورد. از پله ها بالا می رود. فرش ها را دور می زند. از کنار صندلی ها و زیر میز عبور می کند. دقیق و آگاهانه به سوی مقصدی که از پیش می شناسد حرکت می کند. این خون مایعی به جامانده از جسمی بیجان شده نیست. این خون روایتگر است. و…
❤9😢8🕊5😭3🌚2👏1
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
#بامن_بشنوید مناسب این وقت شب🥀 @Lorca1871 Bi çi rengî jînê dibîne ez ji ta (te) dûr im çav ta (te) nemîne dil kî melûl dil kî bi şewat ez bang dikim xeribo xeribo xeribo xeribo şevgera şevan li me westiya bû, ji me re nabêje ev qader bû tu dûr bûyî ji xwediya, tu dur bûyî ji me hemiyan xeribo xeribo xeribo bendî te mam sal û zeman, bendî te mam sabir nema ma ne bes e ji kul û xeman, ma ne bes e ji derd û xema xeribo
❤12😢5😭4
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
ادبیات این روزام رو اصلا در شان خودم نمیبینم ولی خب کاریش هم نمیتونم بکنم 🥀 @Lorca1871
👍9👏7🤝5❤4😢4💯2
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
✅آیا میخواهی ورزشی رو شروع کنی که هم قدرت وهم انعطاف رو باهم داشته باشه؟ ✅آیا از درد کمر،شانه ،گردن وزانوهات شبا خوابت نمیبره؟ ✅آیا ذهنی شلوغ داری که ارامشتو به هم زده و دنبال راهی برای آرام شدن هستی؟ ✅آیا میخواهی اگاهانه تر زندگی کنی؟ ✅آیا دوست داری توان بدنیتو افزایش بدی وحرکات جذاب بزنی ؟ 🧘♀یوگا ،پاسخی یکپارچه به تمام این پرسش هاست 📣📣یوگا ژیوای برگزار میکند : 👌کلاس های عمومی وخصوصی یوگا 👌آموزش وانجام سه سب…
👍4❤3😐2🤔1🙏1
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
بسیاری از متقدان و خرده گیران گله می کنند که دیدگاه مارکسیسم درباره ی سرشت بشر دور از واقعیت و بیش از حد آرمانی ست. مارکسیسم ابلهانه خواب آینده ای را میبیند که در آن همه با هم " رفیق " و " همراه " خواهند بود.رقابت،حسادت، نابرابری، خشونت، پرخاشگری و هم چشمی از صفحه ی زمین محو خواهد شد. راستش در نوشته های مارکس یک کلمه هم در تائید این مدعای عجیب و غریب یافت نمی شود و ... #تری_ایگلتون پرسشهایی از مارکس @Lorca1871
👏7❤4💯2🤝2🥴2
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
معرفي صد فيلسوف چاپ اول 1404 نشر نگاه معاصر پيتر جي كينگ علي مهرآيين وزيري _ شوميز 224 ص (مصور_رنگی) 1.200.000 تومان #نگاه_معاصر @Lorca1871
❤5👍3😱1
Signed Ɓorhaŋ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lorca1871. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,419,478 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لوركا” (@lorca1871), 580 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lorca1871.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.