4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 181–183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 02:37
181
-1
15 Aug 2026, 15:45
182
-1
8 Aug 2026, 12:31
183
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:06
183
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.0%
avg views ÷ 181 subscribers
Avg views / post
67.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
16.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
18 (10 July 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
67
Reactions total
11
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 01s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
186 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5294500430246584263
80
43.0%
custom 5408896446088883182
22
11.8%
custom 6032623218995498135
22
11.8%
custom 5323563335772284797
15
8.06%
🫡
15
8.06%
🤝
11
5.91%
custom 5774076096265850851
8
4.30%
custom 5400034008706851749
7
3.76%
custom 5219853383246034868
4
2.15%
custom 5197524178986619967
2
1.08%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lor_vena. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вчера был пациент со средний гнойным отитом с перфорацией барабанной перепонки, посоветовали лечится Отолорином 🤡 (состав: прокаин, борная кислота, этиловый спирт), который является ототоксичным препаратом. Он не должен попасть в среднее ухо! Возможны повреждения слухового нерва, жжение, болевые ощущения, нарушение равновесия и глухота.
Если у Вас заболело ухо, то не торопитесь что-то закапать сразу в него, выпейте …
Вашему вниманию представлен острый герпетический стоматит.
Пациент болеет в течении недели, в первые 2 дня был подъем температуры.
Обратился к стоматологу, назначена мазь Виферон 🤡
Позволила себе скорректировать лечение и убрать к черту виферон и назначила метрогил денту и ротовые ванночки с корой дуба 💅
Назначать тот же Ацикловир уже не имело смысла, т.к. прошла неделя.
По поводу метода лечения «Подыши над картошкой» 🥔 Он не работает.
Горячий пар не вылечит ни вирусную, ни бактериальную инфекцию.
Но вред нанести может. И вместо лечения, вы можете получить:
• Ожог слизистой.
Горячий пар повреждает слизистую носа, глотки и даже гортани.
• Усиление отека.
Эффект будет обратный тому, на который вы надеетесь. Под действием высокой температуры сосуды расширяются. Допустим вы дышите на…
Ребенок болеет с 15.07.2026г. Жалобы на повышение температуры до 39, сильную боль в горле, отек, налет на миндалинах, при отсутствии насморка. Обратились в тот же день к врачу, назначен курс антибиотиков на 5 дней. 20 числа был последний прием антибиотиков, наступило улучшение состояния. Через неделю они приходят ко мне с теми же жалобами.
Это чего заговор какой-то?
Пришлось объяснять маме ребенка, что придется с…
Последний пациент сегодня помимо ушной боли, пожаловался на боль в мошонке.
Объяснила родителям пациента, что 2 года переучивалась ради того, чтоб не смотреть что там ниже шеи.
Отправила к хирургу, с предварительным диагнозом - перекрут яичек, пускай сами разбираются
Вчера на приеме мама молодого пациента, решила отблагодарить меня поцелуем в щеку. Понимаю, что это было сделано в порыве эмоций, затмивших разум, и промолчала, но такое не приветствую. Страшно подумать, если бы на месте мамы, был папа. Был бы скандал 😒
А когда пациент ест, происходит физиологическая координированная работа мышц,
мозг переключается с ощущения на сам процесс еды,
внимание не так сильно зафиксировано на симптоме. Чего не возникло бы, если бы эта была действительно опухоль 🤷♂️
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lor_vena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игрушечный доктор - ЛОР” (@lor_vena), 181 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lor_vena.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
