Channel

Снижаем IQ

@looowiq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

277subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003503992005
Type	Channel
Username	@looowiq
Description	По всем вопросам - @jekaqwq
Created	30 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	8 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/looowiq

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 276–278 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
8 Aug 2026, 08:35	277	no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:16	277	first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 30 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 14
Links: 8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	66	58.4%
🔥	29	25.7%
👏	5	4.42%
🤣	5	4.42%
🤝	3	2.65%
😭	2	1.77%
❤‍🔥	1	0.885%
🍾	1	0.885%
👍	1	0.885%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,170 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

Проанализировал 100+ отчетов по 01.xyz из @lowiqpts_bot. Все как в посте про Nado 1. Volume vs points/efficiency - < $10k → 55.13 points | 14464.55 PPM | 0.0166 farm cpp - $10–50k → 108.95 | 4982.73 | 0.0370 - $50–100k → 110.28 | 1742.28 | 0.0612 - $100–250k → 69.95 | 601.90 | 0.1900 - > $250k → 387.65 | 618.23 | 0.2181 До 50k объёма PPM держится очень высоким, дальше резко проседает, причем до 10k объема farm cpp…

🔥11❤7👏2❤‍🔥1🍾1

26 Mar 2026, 11:27 UTC≈1,370 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

Проанализировал 200+ отчетов за последние 4 недели по Nado из @lowiqpts_bot. Возле каждой метрики 3 числа: points - медианное количество points у кошельков, которые соответствовали этому критерию, PPM - points per million volume, farm cpp - чистая цена фарма без учета PnL, только fees и доп траты. 1. Volume vs points / efficiency - < $50k → 10.3 points | 527.65 PPM | 0.5687 farm cpp - $50–100k → 28.52 | 526.89 | 0.…

❤8🔥7👍1

13 Mar 2026, 09:03 UTC804 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

01 на супер ранней стадии, пока идет только 6 неделя раздачи + сейчас приватная стадия. По заявлению команды впереди еще как минимум 24 недель фарма. Какие выводы можно сделать по раздаче на этой неделе: - удерджание > вольюм, причем судя по всему считается удержание сквозь недели. - поинты за волюм ограничены - после определенного порога вольюм не принесет вам поинтов либо в формуле его вес становится минимальным.…

❤8

6 Mar 2026, 21:59 UTC884 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

N1 ECO В декабре 2025 запустился мейннет N1 — L1-блокчейна, который позиционируется как специализированный чейн для сверхпроизводительной торговли любыми типами рынков. Экосистема при этом не полностью permissionless: проекты здесь либо инкубируются самой командой N1, либо разрабатываются внутри неё. Инвесторы - Founders Fund, Solana Foundation, Kraken и Arthur Hayes. Первым проектом экосистемы стал perp-DEX 01Exch…

❤5🔥2

27 Feb 2026, 19:51 UTC489 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

Nado раздали поинты, проверяйте. По моим результатам можно сделать только один вывод - за рефов хорошо сыпят. За почти нулевую активность на прошлой неделе я получил 63 поинта, на этой 88. Объем рефов за эти 2 недели около 2000000 Обновил бота, теперь для Nado не надо загружать файл, достаточно использовать команду /nado и отправить адрес кошелька - все данные сами подтянутся из API. К концу неделю добавлю такую же…

❤3

20 Feb 2026, 07:04 UTC≈2,790 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

Написал бота для подсчета Ваших результатов на перпах. @lowiqpts_bot Достаточно просто отправить в чат с ботом файл с вашей торговой историей, (почти во всех перпах ее можно экспортировать в json или csv формате) написать количество заработанных поинтов и Вы получите полный отчет по ключевым метрикам, как на скрине. Для ethereal такой файл даже прикреплять не надо, все нужные данные подтянутся из API. Пока поддерж…

🔥8👏3🤝3❤1

19 Jan 2026, 12:30 UTC≈2,040 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

https://vari.centillions.xyz/ Очень удобный дешборд для тех кто фармит Variational Ранжирует тикеры по основным метрикам, так же можно добавлять свои формулы На этой неделе тестирую токены с низким OI и адекватным спредом, стараюсь подбивать акки под оптимальные метрики из этого поста

❤5

15 Jan 2026, 17:26 UTC657 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

Perp DEX farming TGE Lighter вызвал много фомо. Хотя сам дроп получился меньше чем у HL, ажиотажа он по ощущениям создал больше: завышенные ожидания комьюнити, спекуляции на Polymarket и миллионные объёмы на OTC сыграли свою роль. Что нужно знать сейчас о перп-мете? Фарминг поинтов на перпах - одна из самых очевидных активностей на рынке. Лидеры сектора вышли с хорошими дропами и высокими FDV. Это вполне понятный …

❤7

30 Dec 2025, 19:42 UTC≈5,590 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

Как мы могли вынести лайтер на $500000? В очередной вечер, тыкаясь в лайтере и разбираясь с аккаунтами, я заметил, что их реферальная система работает с багом: для клейма инвайта не нужна была авторизация или подпись с кошелька. То есть если добавить кошелек в контакты в ребби, можно было заклеймить свой инвайт, используя другой кошелек, если до этого он не клеймил другой инвайт. Изначально я попробовал с рандомным…

❤22🤣5😭2🔥1

30 Dec 2025, 15:12 UTCviews —

Channel created

30 Dec 2025, 15:12 UTCviews —

Channel photo updated

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @looowiq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 996,718 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Crypto Fluger
@CryptoFluger · 1,8031 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

HUB cp0x (хаб сделок)
@cp0xdeals · 3391 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Снижаем IQ” (@looowiq), 277 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/looowiq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.