Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Инструктор по сливу

@longuem

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

232subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001374833881
TypeChannel
Username@longuem
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/longuem

Growth

232233232.56 Aug 2026, 20:04 — 233 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:47 — 233 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:40 — 232 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:047 Aug 2026, 12:40
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 232–233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 12:40232-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:47233no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:04233first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1745.9%
😁1027.0%
🤣38.11%
12.70%
12.70%
👀12.70%
👎12.70%
👏12.70%
💯12.70%
😭12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2025 to 7 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2025, 10:47 UTC≈1,550 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

даже не уджержался, хотя вроде все видят эти заявления. Очень быстро развиваются события, но думаю Владимир Владимирович опять обведет всех вокруг пальца

💯1

Signed Алексей Храмов

7 Aug 2025, 10:47 UTC≈1,460 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @markettwitsPhoto

❗️🇺🇦#украина #геополитика ЗЕЛЕНСКИЙ: ПРИШЛО ВРЕМЯ ПОЛОЖИТЬ КОНЕЦ ВОЙНЕ.

😁6👏1

Signed Алексей Храмов

21 Jul 2025, 14:58 UTC≈1,610 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В США приняли законы о стейблкоинах, планируют стать лидерами криптоиндустрии в будущем. С точки зрения геополитики теперь можно будет официально создать еще больше долларов и в другом агрегатном состоянии внедрить их в мировую экономику, а будет ли это так, посмотрим через 3-5 лет. А пока, следует сосредоточиться на тактических маневрах. Позитивна ли новость для индустрии - Невероятно. Обеление крипты позволяет выд

👍3

Signed Алексей Храмов

11 Jul 2025, 15:42 UTC≈1,130 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В пятницу, перед самыми теплыми выходными за весь год в Москве не хочется нагонять тоски, но картина вырисовывается маслом: рынок продолжает скатываться вниз под тяжестью дивидендного сезона, сильного курса и довольно смутной политической обстановки. И ладно бы все шло своим чередом, медленно, ожидаемо, как и в прошлые недели, но тут под закрытие пятницы индекс ныряет на 3% вниз. Вспоминаем, что мистер президент США

👍31😁1😭1

Signed Алексей Храмов

15 May 2025, 10:08 UTC≈1,170 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

А есть у кого-то мнение, что переговоры пройдут успешно и будет остановка огня?

  1. остановят бои и продолжат переговоры5%
  2. не остановят бои и продолюат переговоры38%
  3. будут друг друга называть клоунами и переговоры провалятся53%
  4. свой вариант в комментах5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Signed Алексей Храмов

10 May 2025, 22:01 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/rbc_news?livestream Владимир Владимирович собирается что-то нам сказать в воскресенье с утреца, наверное поздравить с 9 мая дополнительно

Signed Алексей Храмов

25 Apr 2025, 10:21 UTC≈1,090 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мягко стелит наш слон: "Крым останется за Россией". Как там ЕС, что ответят на этот вброс? Индекс Мосбиржи стоит колом около отметки в 3000 и не решается бежать вверх, пока не будет подтверждений прогресса в переговорах, хотя господин Путин уже несколько раз по всем каналам сказал: "давайте договариваться"

👍1

Signed Алексей Храмов

18 Apr 2025, 09:42 UTC≈1,040 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если Трамп и США выйдут из переговорного процесса по Украине, то громогласные предвыборные заявления, что война прекратится за 1 день, за 100 дней и тд превратятся в пыль. Трамп перестанет быть нашим слоном, а это удар под дых всему русскому миру) Теоретически до понедельника уже должны быть решения, так что ждем разинув рот

😁2👍1

Signed Алексей Храмов

15 Apr 2025, 16:49 UTC848 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рынки могут падать долго, угадать нижнюю точку невозможно, поэтому адекватным решением может быть плановая покупка раз в некоторое время. Но чтоб деньги на покупку были, их тоже надо заложить заранее, чтоб все было вовремя и прогнозируемо. Для этого и существует долгосрочное планирование, причем не только инвестиций, но и личных финансов. Я надеюсь, что мои читатели знают важность финансового планирования и использу

👍2👎1

Signed Алексей Храмов

15 Apr 2025, 07:55 UTC602 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мир перешел в ожидание решений по сделкам с пошлинами, которые проходят за кулисами и доносятся до нас только через бесконечное биение себя в грудь со стороны товарища Трампа, который твердит: «все идет круто, все хотят договориться». Видно, что где-то наш слон переборщил и дал заднюю, чтоб успокоить катящиеся в пропасть рынки. Так что стало поспокойнее, ведь всегда можно что-то отменить, причем быстро. Деньги не л

👍2

Signed Алексей Храмов

9 Apr 2025, 21:10 UTC643 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ЧТО он сказал? Мне это не снится? Не важно, что на россиянах это не особо отразится. Исторический момент прошел без меня, так рынок наверной лишь пару раз за все существование рос за день

Signed Алексей Храмов

9 Apr 2025, 11:02 UTC555 viewsread 7 August 2026

104% пошлины на импорт из Китая в США +84% пошлины на импорт из США в Китай турбулентность усиливается Россия еще -5% и индекс вернулся на уровень "максимальный негатив по экономике от декабря и полная неопределенность по военным действиям" заявки срабатывают

Signed Алексей Храмов

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @longuem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 May 2025, 10:08 UTCAnonymous Poll66 voters

А есть у кого-то мнение, что переговоры пройдут успешно и будет остановка огня?

  1. остановят бои и продолжат переговоры5%
  2. не остановят бои и продолюат переговоры38%
  3. будут друг друга называть клоунами и переговоры провалятся53%
  4. свой вариант в комментах5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2025 to 7 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,034,891 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инструктор по сливу” (@longuem), 232 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/longuem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.