Sticker, posted without a caption
❤3custom 54384941910070815122💅1💘1custom 52876211209990406531custom 54386048594293963391

Channel
@longlivetheblackparade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
172subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002732042811 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @longlivetheblackparade |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/longlivetheblackparade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 172 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 167 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 167 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (23 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,712 |
| Reactions total | 193 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
193 reactions across 14 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5438494191007081512 | 34 | 17.6% | |
| 💅 | 17 | 8.81% | |
| custom 5210825791486599568 | 15 | 7.77% | |
| custom 5287621120999040653 | 10 | 5.18% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 5.18% | |
| custom 5438229333258835111 | 9 | 4.66% | |
| custom 5438604859429396339 | 9 | 4.66% | |
| 👻 | 9 | 4.66% | |
| custom 5438270032368933021 | 8 | 4.15% | |
| custom 5440850624814032744 | 8 | 4.15% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 4.15% | |
| custom 5440578736204324367 | 7 | 3.63% | |
| custom 5438445696531340745 | 3 | 1.55% | |
| custom 5440608856809971977 | 3 | 1.55% | |
| 😇 | 3 | 1.55% | |
| custom 5440402036954797246 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.518% |
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤3custom 54384941910070815122💅1💘1custom 52876211209990406531custom 54386048594293963391
.• ° * જ⁀✎ Sketching aunt Margaret on the road and listening to music 🌟 For me, who usually works on drawings for hours and days, 10 minutes isn't much time, to put it mildly -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ #art @longlivetheblackparade
❤7custom 54384941910070815125💅1💘1🔥1custom 54386048594293963391
.• ° * જ⁀✎ eng: There's such a thing as an AO3 ship stats list that shows the 100 fastest-growing relationship tags on the website over the period of July 29, 2025 - July 26, 2026. Frerard got its place there at number 74, with 2378 works gained and 15258 in total. укр: Існує така річ, як список статистики шипів на AO3, який показує 100 найшвидше зростаючих тегів зв'язків на вебсайті за період з 29 липня 2025 року …
❤3💅1🔥1custom 52876211209990406531custom 54384941910070815121custom 54386048594293963391custom 54405787362043243671
Posted without readable text
custom 52876211209990406534💅2custom 54386048594293963392custom 54408506248140327442🔥1custom 54384941910070815121
160!! 🤩🤩 Новим людям привітики!
❤7custom 54384941910070815123custom 54408506248140327442custom 52108257914865995681custom 54384456965313407451
.• ° * જ⁀✎ And there are also some of Mikey's business emails, lol 👾 MrMxyztplx - Google groups link -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ #Mikey @longlivetheblackparade
custom 54382700323689330216custom 54384941910070815124custom 54406088568099719773❤1custom 52108257914865995681
Posted without readable text
custom 54382293332588351119custom 54408506248140327443❤2custom 52876211209990406532custom 54382700323689330212custom 54404020369547972462💅1💘1
.• ° * જ⁀✎ not sure if I should want them or cringe from them via @omweekend (inst) -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ #admtake @longlivetheblackparade
🔥6custom 52108257914865995684custom 52876211209990406532❤1❤🔥1👻1custom 54384941910070815121
.• ° * જ⁀✎ actually, it's been so long since I read the comics, need to reread em ✍️✍️ -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ #понеділковиймем @longlivetheblackparade
❤6👻3custom 54384941910070815123💅1custom 52108257914865995681
.• ° * જ⁀✎ New Frank, Derek, and Jamia at the Weird Al show at Hershey Park via @thederekzanetti on inst -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ #frank #mcrwives 🌟 @longlivetheblackparade
❤6💅5💘3custom 54384941910070815122👻1
.• ° * જ⁀✎ me when frerard puppy play 🤩 -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ #понеділковиймем @longlivetheblackparade
custom 54384941910070815125custom 52108257914865995684😇2👻1💅1custom 54384456965313407451custom 54386048594293963391
.• ° * જ⁀✎ Short answer sheet: 1. FTWillz 2. Destroya 3. LLTBP 4. BLind 5. Turnstiles 6. Skeleton 7. Mexico 8. Gash 9. Sorrows 10. INOK 11. Rodneys 12. Tambourine 13. Nigel 14. Kobra 15. Phantom 16. Korse 17. Transformers 18. Inhalers 19. Pansy 20. Blood 21. Sleep Long answer sheet with explanations: 1. FTWillz - post about it here 2. Destroya - lore lies in the comics! 3. LLTBP - self-explanatory 4. BLind - Tr…
custom 52108257914865995682custom 54384941910070815122custom 54405787362043243672❤1💅1💘1😇1custom 54386048594293963391
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @longlivetheblackparade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 733,556 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@longlivetheblackparade named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝔩𝔬𝔫𝔤 𝔩𝔦𝔳𝔢 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔟𝔩𝔞𝔠𝔨 𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔞𝔡𝔢” (@longlivetheblackparade), 172 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/longlivetheblackparade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.