Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Londga Games

Channel

Londga Games

@londgagames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

915subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001924366151
TypeChannel
Username@londgagames
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/londgagames

Growth

9159439297 August 2026 — 943 subscribers8 August 2026 — 943 subscribers8 August 2026 — 942 subscribers14 August 2026 — 937 subscribers20 August 2026 — 931 subscribers27 August 2026 — 927 subscribers5 September 2026 — 915 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 29 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 911–947 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 02:58915-12
27 Aug 2026, 09:09927-4
20 Aug 2026, 23:05931-6
14 Aug 2026, 23:26937-5
8 Aug 2026, 11:11942-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:49943no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:34943first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

248 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9036.3%
❤‍🔥6727.0%
👍3313.3%
🤣2911.7%
🔥197.66%
😁41.61%
🆒31.21%
😇20.806%
🎉10.403%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Feb 2026, 20:12 UTC≈2,080 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Вот пример когда гандикап не помогает а только мешает. У соперника намного сильнее команда была а я 1-0 проиграл.😂😂😂

🤣22❤‍🔥2😁21🎉1

24 Feb 2026, 17:13 UTC≈1,980 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥51

24 Feb 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,860 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥81

24 Feb 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,410 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какая прокачка лучше

  1. 128%
  2. 231%
  3. 341%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥53

24 Feb 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,350 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не могу определиться какая лучше прокачка😱

❤‍🔥131

24 Feb 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,060 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

31❤‍🔥3🔥2😇2

23 Feb 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,040 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот прокачка 🔥👍😂

👍12🤣74❤‍🔥1

22 Feb 2026, 12:24 UTC990 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/fTyZ8Kb2oYQ?is=NyIv4NA89Rv4cpV2

14👍5🔥2❤‍🔥1🆒1

20 Feb 2026, 23:06 UTC≈1,090 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какая прокачка лучше

  1. Первая36%
  2. Вторая64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥4

20 Feb 2026, 23:05 UTC≈1,020 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥21

20 Feb 2026, 22:28 UTC904 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/GXX9cA9dgGc?is=H0IOEydqKWSuR61v

3❤‍🔥2

20 Feb 2026, 21:35 UTC898 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

2❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @londgagames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Feb 2026, 17:07 UTCAnonymous Poll177 voters

Какая прокачка лучше

  1. 128%
  2. 231%
  3. 341%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Feb 2026, 23:06 UTCAnonymous Poll215 voters

Какая прокачка лучше

  1. Первая36%
  2. Вторая64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 24 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Pro eFootball
@proefootball · 47,969
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Londga Games” (@londgagames), 915 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/londgagames.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.