🤩🤩🤩🎲🎲🎲🎲🤩🤩🤩 🦴🦴🦴 N̶̶a̶̶t̶̶e̶̶ R̶̶i̶̶v̶̶e̶̶r̶̶ 🦴🦴🦴 ————————————————— ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝐾𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠 ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑦 ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝑡𝑜 𝑘𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑚𝑒. 🤍🤍 ⭐⭐⭐⭐🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴 ——————🤩🤍🤩——————
custom 54292897840339504231

Channel
@lolipetel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
506subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001865407425 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lolipetel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lolipetel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 506 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 499 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 499 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 500 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (24 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 961 |
| Reactions total | 59 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
551 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5343825445286606222 | 164 | 29.8% | |
| custom 5429289784033950423 | 98 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5337239258967065496 | 61 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5433887327480991567 | 58 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5251372305690411893 | 51 | 9.26% | |
| custom 5294159332533875368 | 41 | 7.44% | |
| custom 5440494645039610208 | 29 | 5.26% | |
| custom 5285315668453901895 | 28 | 5.08% | |
| custom 5312209336322269619 | 21 | 3.81% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 551reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lolipetel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩🤩🤩🎲🎲🎲🎲🤩🤩🤩 🦴🦴🦴 N̶̶a̶̶t̶̶e̶̶ R̶̶i̶̶v̶̶e̶̶r̶̶ 🦴🦴🦴 ————————————————— ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝐾𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠 ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑦 ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝑡𝑜 𝑘𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑚𝑒. 🤍🤍 ⭐⭐⭐⭐🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴 ——————🤩🤍🤩——————
custom 54292897840339504231
турист спасибо за подарок ты мой хороштй😭😭
custom 531220933632226961911custom 53438254452866062226custom 53372392589670654965custom 52513723056904118931
простите, ребята, обещанный контент я отсниму и выложу, но когда будет что-то новое, я не знаю. постараюсь побыстрее вернуться в строй, но пока что мне нужен отдых
custom 52941593325338753686custom 53438254452866062226custom 53372392589670654964custom 54338873274809915673
Channel name was changed to «рест catharsis💉»
сорянчик за неактив, на днях планирую отснять вам кое-какой контент на волне хайпа, и в ближайшее время запостить. сейчас ещё и новый формат постов вышел, как раз проверим. простите за то что постов не было уже полтора месяца...
custom 531220933632226961910custom 52941593325338753683custom 53372392589670654961custom 53438254452866062221custom 54404946450396102081
у меня посадка, пожелайте удачи или что ещё там желают. ни разу не летала на самолётах
custom 534382544528660622211custom 52513723056904118937custom 52941593325338753682
хотела написать хороший и красивый пост, но как-то у меня совсем нет сил... в общем, прощай Сибирь, встречай Санкт-Петербург. я была рада здесь познакомиться с теми, с кем познакомилась, и надеюсь на дальнейшее общение с вами. жаль, конечно, что действительно хорошо я начала с кем-то общаться совсем незадолго до переезда. а вам счастливых каникул!
custom 533723925896706549619custom 54404946450396102085custom 52941593325338753684
...вместе мы будем вечными. но я боюсь тёмного моря которое меня поглотит 🧖♀️ ⠀🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⠀LSTR-512 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⠀by catharsis🌟 ⠀ рт, реакции
custom 534382544528660622270custom 543388732748099156750custom 542928978403395042342custom 52941593325338753684custom 54404946450396102084custom 52853156684539018953custom 53372392589670654963custom 52513723056904118932
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! катарсис, очень любила ваши прохождения на ютубе, и вот абсолютно случайно наткнулась на ваш тгк в конфе. вы очаровательна ૮₍ ´ ꒳ `₎ა ⬅️ капец спасибо большое😭😭 я рада очень что вам нравлюсь🌟
custom 52853156684539018957
когда я задумываюсь, что за моим контентом реально интересно наблюдать людям, и кто-то активно следит за мной уже несколько лет, становится хорошо на душе. спасибо, любимые, я буду стараться для вас еще лучше🌟
custom 533723925896706549616custom 54404946450396102088custom 52941593325338753687custom 52513723056904118931
🤍🤍 я розовая недели три? так ещё и с модной антибровью, которая гордо носится уже полтора месяца
custom 542928978403395042322custom 528531566845390189511custom 53372392589670654966custom 52513723056904118932custom 53438254452866062222custom 54338873274809915672custom 54404946450396102082custom 52941593325338753681
кто еще не добавил папочку, успевайте!
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lolipetel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 360,566 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“catharsis💉” (@lolipetel), 506 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lolipetel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.