Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

catharsis💉

@lolipetel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

506subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001865407425
TypeChannel
Username@lolipetel
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lolipetel

Growth

499506502.57 August 2026 — 500 subscribers8 August 2026 — 499 subscribers8 August 2026 — 499 subscribers14 August 2026 — 506 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 498–507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:56506+7
8 Aug 2026, 04:18499no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:41499-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:35500first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 24 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.5%
avg views ÷ 506 subscribers
Avg views / post
240
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (24 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total961
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

551 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534382544528660622216429.8%
custom 54292897840339504239817.8%
custom 53372392589670654966111.1%
custom 54338873274809915675810.5%
custom 5251372305690411893519.26%
custom 5294159332533875368417.44%
custom 5440494645039610208295.26%
custom 5285315668453901895285.08%
custom 5312209336322269619213.81%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 551reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
123
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 15 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
56
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lolipetel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kinetXxXPhoto

🤩🤩🤩🎲🎲🎲🎲🤩🤩🤩 🦴🦴🦴 N̶̶a̶̶t̶̶e̶̶ R̶̶i̶̶v̶̶e̶̶r̶̶ 🦴🦴🦴 ————————————————— ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝐾𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠 ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑦 ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝑡𝑜 𝑘𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑚𝑒. 🤍🤍 ⭐⭐⭐⭐🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴 ——————🤩🤍🤩——————

custom 54292897840339504231

1 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC190 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

турист спасибо за подарок ты мой хороштй😭😭

custom 531220933632226961911custom 53438254452866062226custom 53372392589670654965custom 52513723056904118931

20 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC362 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

простите, ребята, обещанный контент я отсниму и выложу, но когда будет что-то новое, я не знаю. постараюсь побыстрее вернуться в строй, но пока что мне нужен отдых

custom 52941593325338753686custom 53438254452866062226custom 53372392589670654964custom 54338873274809915673

19 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC359 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

сорянчик за неактив, на днях планирую отснять вам кое-какой контент на волне хайпа, и в ближайшее время запостить. сейчас ещё и новый формат постов вышел, как раз проверим. простите за то что постов не было уже полтора месяца...

custom 531220933632226961910custom 52941593325338753683custom 53372392589670654961custom 53438254452866062221custom 54404946450396102081

29 Jun 2026, 10:48 UTC728 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

у меня посадка, пожелайте удачи или что ещё там желают. ни разу не летала на самолётах

custom 534382544528660622211custom 52513723056904118937custom 52941593325338753682

29 Jun 2026, 09:45 UTC682 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

хотела написать хороший и красивый пост, но как-то у меня совсем нет сил... в общем, прощай Сибирь, встречай Санкт-Петербург. я была рада здесь познакомиться с теми, с кем познакомилась, и надеюсь на дальнейшее общение с вами. жаль, конечно, что действительно хорошо я начала с кем-то общаться совсем незадолго до переезда. а вам счастливых каникул!

custom 533723925896706549619custom 54404946450396102085custom 52941593325338753684

4 Jun 2026, 09:40 UTC≈2,030 views178 reactions56 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

...вместе мы будем вечными. но я боюсь тёмного моря которое меня поглотит 🧖‍♀️ ⠀🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⠀LSTR-512 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⠀by catharsis🌟 ⠀ рт, реакции

custom 534382544528660622270custom 543388732748099156750custom 542928978403395042342custom 52941593325338753684custom 54404946450396102084custom 52853156684539018953custom 53372392589670654963custom 52513723056904118932

2 Jun 2026, 05:01 UTC934 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! катарсис, очень любила ваши прохождения на ютубе, и вот абсолютно случайно наткнулась на ваш тгк в конфе. вы очаровательна ૮₍ ´ ꒳ `₎ა ⬅️ капец спасибо большое😭😭 я рада очень что вам нравлюсь🌟

custom 52853156684539018957

1 Jun 2026, 10:24 UTC965 views32 reactions52 Starsread 8 August 2026

когда я задумываюсь, что за моим контентом реально интересно наблюдать людям, и кто-то активно следит за мной уже несколько лет, становится хорошо на душе. спасибо, любимые, я буду стараться для вас еще лучше🌟

custom 533723925896706549616custom 54404946450396102088custom 52941593325338753687custom 52513723056904118931

31 May 2026, 09:12 UTC964 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍 я розовая недели три? так ещё и с модной антибровью, которая гордо носится уже полтора месяца

custom 542928978403395042322custom 528531566845390189511custom 53372392589670654966custom 52513723056904118932custom 53438254452866062222custom 54338873274809915672custom 54404946450396102082custom 52941593325338753681

31 May 2026, 08:05 UTC702 viewsread 8 August 2026

кто еще не добавил папочку, успевайте!

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lolipetel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 360,566 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“catharsis💉” (@lolipetel), 506 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lolipetel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.