Channel
@lokteva_lo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
421subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001302323558 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lokteva_lo |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lokteva_lo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:42 | 421 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 424 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 426 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 430 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 431 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 433 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
135 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 36 | 26.7% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5307658358910634197 | 14 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5328014489554002336 | 11 | 8.15% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 8.15% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 7.41% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 5.93% | |
| custom 5211077171627437300 | 7 | 5.19% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 2.96% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| custom 5251369136004539468 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5408952654325883038 | 1 | 0.741% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.741% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.741% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lokteva_lo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Не хожу на расклады, а то меня там запрограммируют». Я часто такое слышу от людей. Получается, если таролог или рунолог предсказал не совсем то, что хотел услышать клиент, и всё произошло именно так, как сказал практик — значит, мастер просто навешал свою «программу», а не считал пространство? ❓Правда ли это? Давайте разберёмся в этом раз и навсегда. Просто считывать информацию из пространства — это как включить р…
👍4
Почему духовные люди боятся больших денег? 💴 Можно годами помогать другим, отдавать вагоны энергии, жить в постоянном дефиците и искренне считать это своим «благородным духовным путём». Но на самом деле за этим часто скрываются банальные ментальные блоки. Проверьте, какие из этих скрытых установок живут внутри вас: ❌ «Духовный человек должен жить скромно и не думать о материальном» ❌ «Если я начну много зарабатыват…
💯5custom 53280144895540023364custom 53076583589106341971
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰4
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰5
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰4
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰5
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰4❤🔥1🌭1💘1
Скоро приедут ко мне новые руны💘 Из розового кварца 🦩
custom 52110771716274373007🔥5🥰4🌭1
Ошибка №7: Воспринимать систему как точный календарь 🛑 Это одна из главных причин, почему люди разочаровываются в раскладах. Инструменты прекрасно показывают направление развития ситуации, тенденции и вероятный исход. Но они далеко не всегда выдают точные сроки реализации, особенно если вы активно работаете над собой и меняетесь. 📅У меня был случай, когда предсказанное событие произошло через полгода вместо загаданн…
💯3👍1custom 53076583589106341971
📍Ошибка №5: Это ошибка завышенной важности, когда один и тот же вопрос задают по несколько раз в день в надежде, что со второй или третьей попытки выпадет знак посимпатичнее. Если перепроверять систему из состояния паники: «Ну когда уже это случится?», «А точно?», «А если перепроверить?», расклад перестаёт работать как навигатор. Карты или руны просто отзеркалят вашу тревожность и выдадут хаотичный ответ. Как верну…
🔥4⚡2custom 53076583589106341972
Ошибка №2: Почему расклады «молчат» или путают нас? 🛑 Мы часто боимся задавать системе уточняющие вопросы и вытягивать дополнительные знаки. Но работа с картами или рунами — это живой диалог, а не статичная шпаргалка из учебника. Когда выпадает сложный или двоякий символ, мы часто трактуем его, полагаясь на свои мимолётные мысли, желания или наоборот страхи. Вместо этого гораздо эффективнее сделать доп-расклад и пр…
🔥4🥰3custom 53076583589106341971
💙На днях освоили диагностику и расклады на себе, до этого изучили весь Старший Футарк. Сегодня — руническая медитация. Все в восторге. И я тоже, так как этот поток для меня особенный.
👍3🥰3⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lokteva_lo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СЕВЕРНЫЙ ВЕТЕР” (@lokteva_lo), 421 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lokteva_lo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.