Channel
@lllamare
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003896784738 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lllamare |
| Description | •-–-–‐–•-–-–‐–‐–••-–‐–-–•-–‐–-–• ♡ 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟 ♡ ℎ𝑒.|.𝑠ℎ𝑒 ♡ 𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑡 : https://t.me/boost/lllamare ♡ 𝑟𝑢𝑠.|.𝑒𝑛𝑔 •-–-–-–•-–-–‐–-–••-–-–-–•-–-–-–• |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lllamare |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 57 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 57 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (8 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,177 |
| Reactions total | 77 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
84 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 34.5% | |
| custom 5386338715209589422 | 10 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5386485873674051206 | 10 | 11.9% | |
| 💋 | 10 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5400242628153338584 | 9 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5283105267829997242 | 7 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5193161866603430155 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5386698070828277579 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5420141555233071341 | 1 | 1.19% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 °•~ ᴨᴩиниʍᴀю ϶ᴄᴛᴀɸᴇᴛу ᴏᴛ: Люмы 🌟 ~°•Суть эстафеты — сделать эстетику по своему последнему косплею📼📼 ~°ʍᴏиʍ ᴨᴏᴄᴧᴇдниʍ ᴋᴏᴄᴨᴧᴇᴇʍ быᴧ ɜᴀᴋᴏᴄ нᴀ ᴄуᴀ иɜ ᴀliᴇn Sᴛᴀgᴇ. ʍнᴇ ᴏчᴇнь ᴨᴏнᴩᴀʙиᴧᴏᴄь, ᴋᴀᴋ ᴏнᴀ у ʍᴇня ᴨᴏᴧучиᴧᴀᴄь! ᴛᴇᴨᴇᴩь у ʍᴇня ʙ ᴨᴧᴀнᴀх ᴄдᴇᴧᴀᴛь ᴄуᴀ ʙ ᴄᴛиᴧᴇ ᴀngᴇl🍥🍥 ᴨᴇᴩᴇдᴀю ϶ᴄᴛᴀɸᴇᴛу: ✨Гоголяшке ✨Мари ✨Vpionpka ✨Cyber
–Тётя Катя приготовила для вас подарок....ЕГОР КРИД📼
💋6custom 53864858736740512061
°•~Сегодня у меня экзамен, очень страшно.🍬 Пожалуйста, поболейте за меня, чтобы я всё сдала с первого раза!
custom 54002426281533385847
Posted without readable text
custom 52831052678299972425custom 53864858736740512064custom 53863387152095894223❤2custom 53866980708282775791custom 54201415552330713411
🔡🔡🔠🔠🔠 Кица прошла нормалды,единственный минус– моё самочувствие, сейчас мне очень не очень, но не смотря на это мне было хорошо с друзьяшкам, спасибо Ламарчику и Гоголяшке 🍬🍬
❤4custom 53863387152095894223custom 53864858736740512063custom 53866980708282775791
-скрытая камера меня поймала сегодня 😭
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
‐ я хз поеду ли завтра на кико,если выживу после сегодняшнего хахаха📼
❤2
день прошёл шикарно,кица огонь,только я сейчас помру,очень сильно болят ноги 😭 Так же я была на ночевке с моими самыми лучшими бести🩷 с одной бести мы знакомы были дай бог день
❤3custom 53864858736740512062
-едем с мизи на кицу 📼
❤6
ну какая красота 📼
❤1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 💛💛 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 💛💛 🤩💛💛💛 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 💛💛💛💛💛 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 💛💛 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 ℌ𝔪, 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔦𝔡𝔢𝔞 𝔬𝔣 𝔴𝔯𝔦𝔱𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔞 𝔫𝔬𝔳𝔢𝔩 𝔠𝔞𝔪𝔢 𝔞𝔟𝔬𝔲𝔱 𝔞𝔣𝔱𝔢𝔯 𝔯𝔢𝔞𝔡𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔄𝔫𝔶𝔞'𝔰 𝔴𝔬𝔯𝔨. 𝔗𝔥𝔞𝔱'𝔰 𝔴𝔥𝔢𝔫 ℑ 𝔣𝔦𝔯𝔰𝔱 𝔡𝔦𝔰𝔠𝔬𝔳𝔢𝔯𝔢𝔡 𝔱𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔪𝔢𝔱𝔞𝔭𝔥𝔬𝔯𝔰 𝔞𝔫𝔤𝔢𝔩𝔰 𝔩𝔬𝔳𝔢 𝔰𝔬 𝔪𝔲𝔠𝔥 𝔠𝔬𝔲𝔩𝔡 𝔟𝔢 𝔲𝔰𝔢𝔡 𝔱𝔬 𝔱𝔢𝔩𝔩 𝔰𝔱𝔬𝔯𝔦𝔢𝔰. ℑ 𝔥𝔞𝔡 𝔰𝔬𝔪𝔢𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔱𝔬 𝔰𝔞𝔶, 𝔞𝔩𝔬𝔫𝔤 𝔴𝔦𝔱𝔥 𝔞 𝔴𝔢𝔞𝔩𝔱𝔥 𝔬𝔣 𝔦𝔫𝔡𝔢𝔩𝔦𝔟𝔩𝔢 𝔪𝔢𝔪𝔬𝔯𝔦𝔢𝔰 𝔱𝔬 𝔡𝔯𝔞𝔴
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lllamare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 496,174 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“°-–/𝐿𝐴𝑀𝐴𝑅.𝑅𝐸/–-°” (@lllamare), 57 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lllamare.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.