Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 58 days, net -829. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,882–27,959 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Oct 2026, 01:18
27,006
-61
6 Oct 2026, 17:19
27,067
-97
1 Oct 2026, 20:54
27,164
-203
18 Sept 2026, 10:57
27,367
-27
16 Sept 2026, 02:17
27,394
-28
14 Sept 2026, 12:18
27,422
-24
12 Sept 2026, 20:58
27,446
-20
11 Sept 2026, 00:21
27,466
-36
8 Sept 2026, 02:36
27,502
-37
5 Sept 2026, 00:18
27,539
-16
3 Sept 2026, 06:46
27,555
-9
2 Sept 2026, 04:56
27,564
-12
1 Sept 2026, 07:39
27,576
-17
31 Aug 2026, 10:23
27,593
-21
30 Aug 2026, 10:38
27,614
-9
29 Aug 2026, 12:14
27,623
-26
28 Aug 2026, 09:33
27,649
-16
27 Aug 2026, 06:29
27,665
-6
26 Aug 2026, 06:55
27,671
-7
25 Aug 2026, 04:54
27,678
first reading
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.34%
avg views ÷ 27,006 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,520
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held
78 (21 July 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total
68,108
Reactions total
2,950
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Oct 2026, 19:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
617
Videos
97
Links
84
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
8m 03s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,026 reactions across 76 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,868
71.4%
🔥
1,261
11.4%
❤🔥
684
6.20%
👍
194
1.76%
🙏
189
1.71%
👏
159
1.44%
🤣
122
1.11%
🕊
87
0.789%
⚡
58
0.526%
💯
56
0.508%
✍
48
0.435%
🗿
44
0.399%
🤝
44
0.399%
🫡
33
0.299%
🏆
24
0.218%
👌
21
0.19%
🤯
17
0.154%
🐳
15
0.136%
😎
14
0.127%
🥰
10
0.091%
23 further kinds
78
0.707%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,026 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Existen tres niveles principales que quieres trabajar si quieres tener exito con tu negocio, lamentablemente lo mas común es que emprendedores solo trabajen el primer nivel
El nivel 1 es la mentalidad, aunque no seas consciente este nivel lo has trabajado si has ido de empleado a vivir de tu negocio, porque la única diferencia entre un empleado que gana un salario normal y un emprendedor que genera 20k al mes es su …
La verdad mas bonita es que todo aquel que tenga un genuino deseo en su corazón para crear riqueza puede cumplir ese sueño
Tu EGO creara resistencia a esto o incluso tu falta de FE porque aun no has recibido una respuesta de “como crear esta riqueza”, lo que no entiendes es que el “COMO” ya reside dentro de ti y no lo vas a encontrar copiando a otras personas que ya generan riqueza de manera natural
En estado natur…
Todos quieren que el camino esté iluminado desde el principio hasta el final antes de empezar a caminarlo.
La realidad es que respondiendo la llamada de la conciencia es como el camino se va iluminando paso a paso
Lo unico que tienes que hacer es simplificar tu vida. Tu objetivo cada dia deberia ser no romper caracter. Cuando lo haces te quedas atrapado en un evento pasado y te desalineas de quien realmente eres y …
El crecimiento de tu negocio puede hacerte sentir mejor o puede destruirte.
¿Entonces cual es la diferencia entre crecer y autodestruirse?
Tan simple como la sabiduría y el propósito. El problema no es querer mas, es la avaricia sin sabiduría
Cuando creces sin propósito el dinero te hace sentir vacio
Cuando creces sin sabiduría no sabes como manejar ese dinero
Entonces ¿como evitas o solucionas este problema com…
Muchos dicen que conocen a Jesus, pero el dia del juicio final Jesus dira a muchos “Aparta, nunca te conoci”
Solo aquellos que hacen la voluntad de Dios los conoce Jesus
Porque esto es muy importante ⚠️ te enseña que lo que dices no vale de nada, solo lo que haces
Mis acciones dicen que Jesus me conoce, ahora hazte tu la pregunta ¿Tus acciones dicen que Jesus te conoce?
Todo reside en alineacion, es lo UNICO que …
La riqueza sin sabiduría es una maldición. El dinero en manos de un necio es un arma de autodestrucción.
Por eso, algunas personas ascienden rápidamente y caen aún más deprisa: su carácter no pudo soportar su fortuna.
Antes de pedir riquezas, pide la sabiduría para administrarlas.
El dinero es el mejor maestro espiritual, la energia del dinero te enseña a amarte a ti mismo, si no aprendes, tarde o temprano, el dinero se esfumara.
En vez de pensar que mas dinero te traerá una vida que amas, entiende que todo sentimiento que quieres experimentar ya vive dentro de ti. Al encontrar todos los sentimientos que quieres experimentar dentro de ti, te sentirás pleno y serás abundante, ahi descubrirás q…
No te hace falta nada para tener exito en la vida, porque el verdadero exito es ser tu mismo, la persona que Dios te creo para ser.
No te obsesiones con tener lo que otras personas tienen o ser lo que otras personas son!! Eso te llevara al fracaso!!! Por mucho 💰 que generes, porque facturar mucho siendo alguien que no eres es el MAYOR FRACASO que existe.
Cuando dejes de copiar y elimines el miedo a ser tu mism@, te…
El dinero no es el fin, es una herramienta que te permite expresar al mundo 🌍 el amor de Dios de una manera unica
Acumular no es el fin sino usar el dinero para experimentar y compartir esas experiencias con el mundo 🌍
Soltar dinero te permite experimentar y descubrir QUIEN REALMENTE ERES. Eso te da una experiencia y sabiduría que despues puedes compartir con el mundo GRATIS para ayudar a los demas
El miedo a solt…
Si haces 50k/mes y tienes miedo a dejar de hacer
💰 aun estas atrapado en el sistema. No el de empleado pero si el del 💰
No tienes un problema de 💰, hacer mas ahora mismo solo aumentara tu miedo a perderlo! Cuando escales a 100k/mes tendras aun mas miedo a perderlo, cuanto mas tienes en un estado de "ESCASEZ" , mas miedo tienes a perderlo
Debes trabajar espiritualmente para conectar con tu SER, tu eres abundante, tu…
Jesus resumio el sistema del mundo así: Nadie puede servir a dos amos
Y lo que te hace libre es servir al amo correcto, recuerda solo existen dos: Dios y el dinero
Amo significa algo que te controla, que te posee. No importa que diga la gente, la realidad es que su motivación reside en servir a un amo o el otro, nada mas.
La religion nos ha enseñado que el maligno es peligroso, que el maligno es el enemigo que te …
Ese dolor sientes que siempre escapas con esa copa de alcohol, esa raya, esa nueva mujer, esa fiesta o cualquier vicio, entiende que tiene un proposito!!! Ese dolor aparece ahi para que tu puedas crecer para recibir el siguiente nivel, pero si escapas ese dolor nunca podrás experimentar ese crecimiento.
Cuando veo a las personas usando vicios me pregunto: ¿De que escapan? Joder, ¿es tan mala su vida?
Lo que hace en…
❤85🔥19🙏5❤🔥4👌3🕊2👍1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @lladosmasterclassgratis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@lladosmasterclassgratis edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Wealthy Trades @wealthytradesacademy · 116,539 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
TeamTate Updates @TatesRealLifeUpdates · 45,715 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Llados University” (@lladosmasterclassgratis), 27,006 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lladosmasterclassgratis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.