Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ㅤlivelyy

Channel

ㅤlivelyy

@liwwtgk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002127718330
TypeChannel
Username@liwwtgk
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/liwwtgk

Growth

404140.514 August 2026 — 40 subscribers14 August 2026 — 40 subscribers6 September 2026 — 41 subscribers14 August 20266 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 17:3941+1
14 Aug 2026, 23:5340no change
14 Aug 2026, 07:1640first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 18 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
53s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

165 reactions across 6 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.09% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5294035839339242324159.09%
custom 5352792435057516902137.88%
custom 5235463678106571250127.27%
custom 5350589164079312062127.27%
custom 5375576411929088773116.67%
custom 5348208833074330895106.06%
custom 5350558871674967996106.06%
custom 5377472326457659100106.06%
custom 546560337603936695095.45%
custom 537768103180347522084.85%
custom 535046012178689907463.64%
custom 537314665444045328363.64%
custom 521319290687720009653.03%
custom 537733121101218079853.03%
custom 539812619711887170453.03%
53.03%
💘53.03%
custom 526956407775930199042.42%
custom 521300280732970997731.82%
custom 542030462655138583631.82%
4 further kinds84.85%

Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2025 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 6 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @liwwtgk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 April 2025 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC23 views18 reactions3 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

⭐️

custom 54656033760393669509custom 52131929068772000965custom 54203046265513858363custom 53800567156538349111

7 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC56 views26 reactions5 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🏹

custom 535058916407931206212custom 53482088330743308957custom 52695640777593019904custom 52130028073297099773

10 Jul 2026, 22:27 UTC128 views34 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🐾

custom 535279243505751690213custom 53731466544404532836custom 53981261971188717045custom 53482088330743308953custom 54315112914433122433custom 53210667872472527572custom 53773632042235714252

1 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC269 views35 reactions3 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

💤

custom 529403583933924232415custom 535055887167496799610custom 53504601217868990746custom 52354636781065712504

26 Apr 2026, 15:41 UTC280 views34 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Photo

🤩

custom 537557641192908877311custom 537747232645765910010custom 53776810318034752208custom 53773312110121807985

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @liwwtgk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤlivelyy” (@liwwtgk), 41 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liwwtgk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.