Коэттинг тоже #sinister
custom 52786704005642649951custom 53551694202829847581custom 53571129574089334741

Channel
@livinggad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
536subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002147970736 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @livinggad |
| Description | Лайф, магия, мемы, кодинг, биохакинг, тревожные мысли как живые. Личныйблох для кринжа 👻 🦄 Я — ебейше-зловещий квантово-акаузальный Бог грома и молний ⚡️⚡️ Добавляйте в ник или bio приписку #GAD 🐲 Переходник: @balg_all_projects Контакт: @evilluciya |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/livinggad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 536 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 536 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,065 |
| Reactions total | 1,040 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,040 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5472249313943900872 | 280 | 26.9% | |
| custom 5280848082127319972 | 192 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5355169420282984758 | 157 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5204419147684946447 | 118 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5471930885068577254 | 107 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5472411393124747744 | 67 | 6.44% | |
| custom 5278670400564264995 | 51 | 4.90% | |
| custom 5357112957408933474 | 33 | 3.17% | |
| custom 5469987081654655045 | 28 | 2.69% | |
| custom 5244664030630543347 | 7 | 0.673% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,040reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Коэттинг тоже #sinister
custom 52786704005642649951custom 53551694202829847581custom 53571129574089334741
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 52808480821273199721custom 53551694202829847581custom 53571129574089334741
Слабые должны уходить. Это естественный отбор в масштабе планеты. Думаю, если бы люди занимались этим осознанно вместо того чтобы ждать, пока природа сделает всё сама, было бы даже чище
custom 52044191476849464471custom 53551694202829847581custom 53571129574089334741
Скачано через @YOUTUBE_GAD_BOT
custom 547193088506857725445custom 52044191476849464477custom 54724113931247477447custom 53551694202829847581
#ДЕАНОН Каждый аккаунт в вичтоке - это мой твинк или мой бот. Все каналы - это мои каналы. Некоторые боты запущены на сервере, от которого я забыла пароль, поэтому я потерла над ними контроль. Коэттинг из Юты - это тоже я.
custom 547193088506857725445custom 53551694202829847587custom 54724113931247477447custom 52044191476849464471
Всё существует. Всё, что было кем-то когда-то придумано, что придумают или придумывают в этот самый момент. Оно уже есть. Нет ничего невозможного. Всё существует: от единорогов и русалок до магии катастроф и возможности вызывать землетрясения силой мысли. ⚡️⚡️ Манифестируйте ваши желания и мечты 🕺
custom 535516942028298475845custom 52786704005642649957custom 54699870816546550457custom 52808480821273199722
Скачано через @YOUTUBE_GAD_BOT
custom 547241139312474774445custom 52044191476849464477custom 52786704005642649957custom 54699870816546550451
Тот самый квантовый момент, когда начинаешь говорить о Виндексе, и YouTube выдает это:
custom 528084808212731997246custom 52446640306305433477custom 52786704005642649957
Блядь, я пробежал 4 км 400+400+3,3 со скоростью 10 км/час Я думала, что потеряю сознание раз 5, но нет, норм - не очень норм, потому что показатели просели... Но хоть так. Я не понимаю, почему оно так волнами: то бежишь 6 км, то с плачем и молитвами "сотонапоможиииии" 1 пробегаешь.... Хрень.
custom 535516942028298475846custom 52044191476849464477custom 53571129574089334747custom 54722493139439008721
Invoice, posted without a caption
custom 528084808212731997246custom 52044191476849464477custom 53551694202829847587
и я очень удивилась, что он не был запаролен 👍
custom 547224931394390087246custom 54699870816546550457custom 54719308850685772547custom 52044191476849464471
#сны Я ещё когда тот телефон открывала, я пальцем камеру закрывала. Ну мало ли, вдруг там автоматически передается локация и фоткает. Бля. Даже во снах держу руку на пульсе 🥺
custom 547224931394390087247custom 52044191476849464477custom 52786704005642649957
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @livinggad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 364,404 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ливинг Гад” (@livinggad), 536 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/livinggad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.