Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✨Alena SOKOLOVA PRO Душу

Channel

✨Alena SOKOLOVA PRO Душу

@live_breathe_transform

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

946subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001273721953
TypeChannel
Username@live_breathe_transform
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/live_breathe_transform

Growth

9469489478 August 2026 — 948 subscribers8 August 2026 — 948 subscribers15 August 2026 — 947 subscribers24 August 2026 — 946 subscribers8 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 946–948 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 02:34946-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:58947-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:40948no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:16948first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.55%
avg views ÷ 946 subscribers
Avg views / post
71.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,428
Reactions total356
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 18s
Average length
6m 18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

356 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯9225.8%
🔥9225.8%
❤‍🔥8523.9%
4512.6%
🙏164.49%
😍92.53%
💔71.97%
😢41.12%
🤩41.12%
👍20.562%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 356reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC35 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Алёна, благодарю тебя за то, что ты делаешь 🤍 В 2025 году на этом видео я была ещё под псевдонимом Амиго — из-за непринятия папы и своей родовой системы. И один из важных результатов для меня, помимо всего, что сейчас происходит, — это возвращение в свою силу и свою родную фамилию ✨ Отвечая на вопрос, что было бы, если бы я поддалась сопротивлению и не пошла, я когда-то ответила: «Всё внутри меня умерло бы и опусти

❤‍🔥4🙏41💯1

Signed Алёна Соколова

6 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC71 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Похоже, это настоящее преступление. Исправляюсь 🤍 После каждого потока программы, где я передаю технологию трансформаций, я получаю не только письменные отзывы, но и видео. И уже несколько лет почти нигде их не публикую. Это отзыв Саши Чернышовой — участницы последнего потока программы «Эволюция Души». Она записала его еще до окончания обучения. За время программы она получила реальные изменения сразу в нескольки

🔥7❤‍🔥5😍32💯1

Signed Алёна Соколова

3 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC90 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

жду тех, кто готов сказать своей родной Душе - да! кто готов снять с нее оковы эго боится только потому, что оно больше не сможет быть главным, но оно не представляет, насколько вам вместе будет хорошо 🕊️✨

❤‍🔥11🔥6😍32

Signed Алёна Соколова

3 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC84 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я предлагаю жить из себя, из Души: чувствовать/знать - а что дальше? Когда есть высшая цель, то ответ всегда есть. Всегда. В тупик не попадаешь.

9💯4🔥3

Signed Алёна Соколова

3 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC81 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

18. НАСТОЯЩЕЕ ИСЦЕЛЕНИЕ — не предполагает уничтожить личность и бороться с умом наша задача - •перестать делать его главным, •освободить Душу, •подчинить ум головы уму сердца, • а далее ум сердца сонастроить с умом духа и высшего сознания • и выбрать возрождение своей Души На пути к этому много блокировок, вот с ними и работаем в первую очередь в программе.

❤‍🔥8🔥5💯3🙏2

Signed Алёна Соколова

3 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC83 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

19. Душа знает, а тело не врет. Даже если внутри гладиаторские бои сопротивляющихся частей. И да, сопротивление - это нормально! Потому что этих частей внутри очень много. Мы слишком привыкли жить во тьме, без света. Мы там все знаем, мы там царицы. И совершенно забыли: а как жить из своего естества?

💯7❤‍🔥54

Signed Алёна Соколова

2 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC81 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пора книгу писать, вот что. Каждую мысль хочется разворачивать еще шире. Пишется и пишется. Наливайте чай и продолжим🕊️

🔥17💯82❤‍🔥2

Signed Алёна Соколова

2 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC82 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥12💯6❤‍🔥3

Signed Алёна Соколова

2 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC80 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

17. Даже проблески контакта с душой, хоть и яркие, часто интерпретируются как просто «вау, как здорово» и всё. В глубь контакта с собой после такого идут далеко не все. Нет опыта, нет понимания, неизвестность, - часто это неосознанный страх ума. Поэтому духовную эволюцию выбирают единицы. Это игра совершенно на другом уровне. Ум головы не находит аргументов «зачем нам туда». Ему проще объяснить, что ты молодец ил

❤‍🔥14💔3💯3

Signed Алёна Соколова

2 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC67 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

14. Нас не учили слушать душу. Тем более ставить ее на первое место. А кто это, чтобы ставить ее на первое место? Ведь если бы с нами о душе говорили с детства, учили ее слышать и заботиться о ней. Если бы нашу истинную потребность в духовной эволюции культивировали с детства, и это было бы нормой жизни, то мы бы не стремились пробуждаться, мы бы просто не «спали». И нам бы не нужны были пояснители простых истин.

💯8❤‍🔥3💔1😢1

Signed Алёна Соколова

2 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC66 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

15. Да и желания души слышать не учили. Нас приучили хотеть то, что нам сказали или показали. Какими бы у нас были ориентиры, если бы в СМИ и на билбордах нам рассказывали о том, как здорово жить в своих энергиях? И снимали бы про это фильмы.. До истинных желаний добраться - это одна из самых трудных задач в условиях нынешнего инфо шума.

🔥7💯4💔3😢1

Signed Алёна Соколова

2 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC72 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

16. Тогда ощущение, - что «я есть часть нечто большего» - что «мне тесно в этих ограниченных смыслах, конечных и банальных играх».. - что душа тянется куда-то, а не знает как дотянуться, но очень хочет — это тоже нормально! даже естественно🙏🏼 Но ум знает свое дело и диктует ей: не сейчас! ты не так важна, мне не до тебя тут… а у нее просто нет сил пробиться сквозь эти умные конструкции..

6💯4🔥3🙏2

Signed Алёна Соколова

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @live_breathe_transform. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 493,911 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✨Alena SOKOLOVA PRO Душу” (@live_breathe_transform), 946 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/live_breathe_transform.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.