Тут ночью был дроп в основном одной, но зато какой работы, так что поглядите пожалуйста 😭
custom 526255575198912788312

Channel
@livaaaak
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
314subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001831114373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @livaaaak |
| Description | Слива лиловая https://vk.com/livakag - основа в вк |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/livaaaak |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 314 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 314 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (14 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,933 |
| Reactions total | 360 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
360 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 90 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5262969623627704708 | 54 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5226556809287845326 | 52 | 14.4% | |
| custom 5404715484404802925 | 40 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5262555751989127883 | 28 | 7.78% | |
| custom 5372966051065638609 | 19 | 5.28% | |
| 🍌 | 17 | 4.72% | |
| custom 5253647444356379580 | 14 | 3.89% | |
| custom 6033010320102918952 | 12 | 3.33% | |
| custom 5224442667470964960 | 9 | 2.50% | |
| custom 5413714557581419320 | 7 | 1.94% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.67% | |
| custom 5404527235988220641 | 4 | 1.11% | |
| custom 5215414165178425004 | 3 | 0.833% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.556% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.556% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.278% |
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @livaaaak. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Тут ночью был дроп в основном одной, но зато какой работы, так что поглядите пожалуйста 😭
custom 526255575198912788312
оч хочу продолжить, но мне завтра на работу.... жду как выйдут из канала все те, кто подписался, пока я буквально ничего не выставляла
❤21custom 60330103201029189527custom 52536474443563795804🥰3custom 52244426674709649603❤🔥2custom 52629696236277047082custom 52265568092878453261
это вообще я рендерю?...
custom 525364744435637958010custom 52629696236277047086custom 60330103201029189525❤3custom 52265568092878453262custom 52244426674709649601
нравится эта разница
custom 522655680928784532611❤4custom 52244426674709649602
так, ну с цветом определилась
custom 540471548440480292513custom 52244426674709649602❤1
ладно, решила потетешить себя артом по нпс в моей днд как хорошо стало
custom 540471548440480292511❤3🥰2custom 52244426674709649601
я не умерла (хотя может да?), я перекатываюсь из одной проблемы в другую и пытаюсь как-то функционировать пока держите скетчи некоторых моих сосалок побочных
❤12custom 54045272359882206414custom 52265568092878453263
давайте все согласимся что такие жесткие дебаты могут быть только по одному поводу ОЛАДЬИ БЕЗ ЕБАНОЙ МАТЬ ЕЕ МУКИ ЭТО СРАНЫЙ ОМЛЕТ УГАШЕНЫЙ ТЫ ОБ ДЕРЕВО
❤21
После недельного отклбчения инета и полного отчаяния, в моей жизни случилось первое невероятное событие за 6 лет моей игры в эту игру С ПЕРВОЙ КРУТКИ МНЕ ВЫПАЛ ВИЛ!!!!!!! ЭТО МОЯ ПЕРВАЯ ССР КАРТА НА ЭТОГО ПРЕКРАСНОГО МОЛОДОГО ЧЕЛОВЕКА Я еще в дисе крутила такая: "бля, ну это карта Вила, у меня всего 3 крутки, пойдем пропьем, ниче не выпадет"
custom 522655680928784532614❤7💋2🥰1custom 52154141651784250041
Ладно, у меня есть скрин с другой игры, ГДЕ Я СИДЕЛА ТОЧНО ТАК ЖЕ БЛЯТЬ
🍌14custom 52265568092878453269custom 52154141651784250042custom 54137145575814193202
сегодня играли в чужих и во время проверки травм у моего персонажа мне выпала мгновенная смерть надо было блять видеть мое лицо в моменте, но мастер обыграл это как приход под температурой у другого игрока НО Я ЗАРИСУЮ ЭТОТ МОМЕНТ КАК МИНИКОМИКС
custom 526296962362770470810🍌3custom 52265568092878453262custom 54137145575814193202🍓1
Как же он блядски хорош
custom 526296962362770470816custom 52625557519891278836custom 54047154844048029256
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @livaaaak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 83,529 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌹Ливыч🌹” (@livaaaak), 314 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/livaaaak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.