Channel
@livNowRadikal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003872156070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @livNowRadikal |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 13 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/livNowRadikal |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 54 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 56 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 57 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 57 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 58 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
69 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 87.0% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 5.80% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Heute brannten die Unterlagen der letzten 20 Jahre meines Lebens im Feuer. Und ich spüre, dass es nicht einfach nur Papier ist, das ich loslasse. Sondern eine ganze alte Version von mir. Und genau das ist, was ich endlich, nach all den Jahren verstanden habe: Es ging nie darum, eine neue Liv zu erschaffen. Keine bessere, stärkere, optimiertere Version von mir. Denn ich beginne mich zu 𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐧… an die Frau, die unt…
❤4❤🔥1
𝐃𝐚𝐬 𝐄𝐧𝐝𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐱. 𝐇𝐢𝐞𝐫 𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐧 𝟐𝟎 𝐉𝐚𝐡𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐋𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐧𝐬. 👇🏼
Verkörperung fühlt sich nicht nach Frieden an. Sondern eher nach einem kompletten Nervenzusammenbruch.
❤2
𝐖𝐢𝐞 𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐦 𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐖𝐞𝐥𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐧 𝐢𝐬𝐭. Meist haben wir Familie um uns herum. Freunde. Kollegen. Und doch… fühlst du dich vielleicht manchmal, als wärst du ganz alleine auf der Welt. So ging es mir gerade. Ich war immer für alle da. Ich denke an diese Freundin: ich kam nach einem 10-Stunden-Arbeitstag nach Hause, müde, ausgelaugt, und freute mich auf meinen Feierabend. Auf die Zeit mit meiner Tochter. Doch kaum war i…
❤3😢1🙏1
· Nein, ich habe jetzt keine Zeit für dich. · Nein, ich möchte heute alleine sein. · Nein, ich werde meinen Körper nie wieder zur Verfügung stellen, nur weil es von mir erwartet wird. · Nein, ich werde mich nicht länger dafür entschuldigen, dass ich Bedürfnisse habe. Und mit jedem dieser kleinen Neins geschah etwas, womit ich niemals gerechnet hätte. Nicht die Welt veränderte sich. 𝐈𝐜𝐡 𝐯𝐞𝐫ä𝐧…
❤6
👇🏼
https://youtu.be/z9txdnwP7Zc?is=GCe1lsUn3fegDx_z Sehr sehenswert.
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7
Wenn du erkennst, dass deine Rettung niemals im Außen lag, wirst du unaufhaltsam.
❤2💯1
𝐃𝐢𝐞 𝐊𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐭𝐞 𝐯𝐨𝐫 𝐮𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐫 𝐍𝐚𝐬𝐞, 𝐝𝐢𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐬 𝐝𝐚𝐬 𝐋𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐧 𝐤𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐭. „Würde ich es schaffen, bei mir zu bleiben, könnte er mich lieben.“ „Wäre ich bereits in der richtigen Frequenz, würde mich seine emotionale Abwesenheit nicht berühren.“ Wie oft ertappst du dich bei solchen Gedanken? Wie oft peitschst du dich subtil selbst aus… im Namen deiner persönlichen Weiterentwicklung? 𝐃𝐢𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫 𝐓𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐟ü𝐫 𝐮𝐧𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞. 𝑭ü𝒓 𝒋𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒏, 𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒈𝒍𝒂𝒖𝒃𝒕…
❤3🙏1
👇🏼
❤1
Von Herzen DANKE an meine wundervolle Tochter, dass sie mir solche Überraschungen erspart hat 😄
😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @livNowRadikal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LIV now - Radikal echt” (@livNowRadikal), 54 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/livNowRadikal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.