Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

FRACTAL.PLUS 🧬 АпоЛІТІчні РИСИ

@liti_ai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

504subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003427353319
TypeChannel
Username@liti_ai
DescriptionFRACTAL.PLUS - психолінгвістична діагностика і не тільки. Канал про характер та типології: як дослідити особистість з допомогою ШІ системи LITI. Сергій Саута, CAIO FRACTAL
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/liti_ai

Growth

5047 Aug 2026, 18:47 — 504 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:17 — 504 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:478 Aug 2026, 04:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 503–505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:17504no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:47504first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.9%
avg views ÷ 504 subscribers
Avg views / post
196
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (10 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,372
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
131
Videos
3
Links
65

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2160.0%
👍925.7%
🔥38.57%
👏12.86%
😁12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC94 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Опрацьовую шкали LITI, бо готую вам подарунок на понеділок, поділюся смішним Зустрічаю таку штуку під час роботу: «Велика П'ятірка» рахує тематичні слова без урахування заперечення: «дедлайни я зриваю» і додає бали за сумлінність. Тобто, людина чітка, виконує, доводить справу до кінця, такий вираз говорить що сумлінна. Отже, вирази: "я прогулюю, я забив на роботу, я зірвав дедлайн, я запив, я виконав роботу погано

🔥1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC107 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У застосунку «FRACTAL PLUS» уже 337 разів пройшли опитувальник по характеру (новий великий опитувальник). Я подивився на результати й нарешті зрозумів, хто добровільно встановлює застосунок, щоб ще глибше розібратися у власній психіці. 32,9% — гармонійні. Нормально живуть і пристосовуються, але все одно вирішили перевірити, чи це не симптом. 24,6% — запальні оптимісти. Швидко надихаються, запускають нове життя з п

3👍1

31 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fractaluaPhoto

Інсайти користувачів застосунку FRACTAL PLUS Найкращий спосіб зрозуміти, чи працює продукт, — подивитися, що про нього говорять користувачі. Після запуску FRACTAL PLUS ми почали отримувати десятки відгуків. І найцікавіше в них — моменти, коли люди несподівано відкривають про себе щось нове. Зібрали кілька інсайтів користувачів. Про сильні сторони, «тіньові» риси, точки росту й відкриття, які складно побачити самос

3

22 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC325 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Інколи після нового психолінгвістичного аналізу, мені хочеться помитися. Профіль минулого головнокомандуючого я відмовився публікувати... Ось новий, Михайло Драпатий: https://liti.fractal.partners/drapatyi.html Відразу у мене стільки смутку, і не розуміння: як же ти там витримаєш? хоча ти генерал, ти досвідчений воїн, але ж видно твою особистість... ой як нелегко тобі буде.. Хоча війна, нікому нелегко... І дякую,

7

21 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC251 viewsread 8 August 2026

А тут нового міністра оборони https://speka.ua/artificial-intelligence/vo-ministra-oboroni-jevgenii-xmara-shho-iogo-mova-govorit-pro-stil-maibutnyogo-kerivnika-oboronnogo-vidomstva-98kyrw

21 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC238 viewsread 8 August 2026

Тут описали трошки особистість нового прем'єра https://thepage.ua/ua/news/sergij-koreckij-psiholingvistichnij-portret-novogo-premyera-or

15 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC279 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Заплановані три пости до Дня Державності. Це третій. Не має сенсу їх представляти: Леонід Кравчук - тут Леонід Кучма - тут. Віктор Ющенко - тут. тут повинен бути той кого потім додадуть до списку президентів, коли емоції стихнуть. Петро Порошенко - тут. Володимир Зеленський - тут. Ось так і дійшли до наших часів...

👍1👏1

14 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC232 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Заплановані три пости до Дня Державності. Це другий. Знайомимося з людьми, які на території сучасної України тоді вирішували долю держави... Павло Скоропадський - тут . Гетьман Української Держави, який керував країною сім із половиною місяців 1918 року. Володимир Винниченко - тут . Перший голова уряду Української Народної Республіки (1917). Симон Петлюра - тут . Головний отаман армії Української Народної Респуб

👍5

13 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC188 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Заплановані три пости до Дня Державності. Це перший. Спроба аналізувати людей, які жили на території України в давні часі з допомогою психолінгвістики - складна задача. Немає їх мови для аналізу. Вони не залишили живої мови, типу листів, щоденників, мемуарів, інтерв'ю чи хоча б нещасного подкасту. Тому ось такий результат по Ярославу Мудрому - тут (спойлер, там пояснення чому нічого немає). І ось такий результат по

👍2

10 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC216 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Два вчені дядьки: Пітер Суедфельд і Філіп Тетлок - міряли в дипломатичних документах те, що назвали інтегративною складністю: здатність тексту втримати кілька точок зору водночас. І неочікувано: виявилось, що вона - оця інтегративна складність - різко падає за кілька місяців до початку воєн. Коли лідер перестає бачити відтінки й бачить лише «ми» і «вони», війна вже близько. Люди не здатні своїм станом тримати балан

4

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @liti_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,327,274 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FRACTAL.PLUS 🧬 АпоЛІТІчні РИСИ” (@liti_ai), 504 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liti_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.