3 measurements spanning 15 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 19:25
169
+2
8 Aug 2026, 15:46
167
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:45
167
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
94.8%
avg views ÷ 169 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (20 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
961
Reactions total
14
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13m 42s
Average length
1m 57s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
21
77.8%
👍
3
11.1%
👏
2
7.41%
🙏
1
3.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نشست هفتگی دوشنبههای شعر گرگان این هفته ۱۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ در فضایی سرشار از مهر و کلام، در سرای انجمنهای هنری استان گلستان برگزار شد؛ نشستی که همچون همیشه، گرگان را در آغوش شعر و خاطره فرو برد. شاعران گرگان و گلستان و میهمانانی از مازندران و سمنان شعرهایشان را خواندند و دکتر لیلا نوروزپور نیز بر روی غزلی از اسماعیل حمیدی و صادق حاجتمند را بررسی و تحلیل کرد و جنبههای مختلف آن را برای حاضران گشود.
اجرای برنامه را ریحانه…
دعوتید به نشست این هفته دوشنبههای شعر گرگان
۱۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
در سرای انجمنهای هنری، جنب ملاقاتی دهم
ساعت ۱۸:۳۰ تا ۲۰:۳۰
با اجرای خانم ریحانه دانشدوست و حضور کارشناس ادبی خانم دکتر لیلا نوروزپور
منتظر حضور سبزتان هستیم.
⏰ به تغییر ساعت توجه کنید.
گزارش نشست هفتگی انجمن «دوشنبههای شعر گرگان»
نشست اخیر انجمن دوشنبههای شعر گرگان با اجرای جناب آقای مهدی جلیلی، با حضور شاعران و علاقهمندان، برگزار شد. در این نشست، علاوه بر شعرخوانی، مجموعهای از اشعار در قالب نقد گروهی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت.
در میانه برنامه، با قطع شدن برق، تاریکی و گرمای شب بر فضا حاکم شد؛ اما شور و اشتیاق حاضران برای گفتگوهای ادبی، بر سختیهای فیزیکی پیروز شد و در ادامه، مسیر پرهیجانتر گذشت.…
انجمن «دوشنبههای شعر گرگان» شما را به ضیافتِ کلمات در نشست هفتگی خود در سرای انجمنهای هنری استان گلستان دعوت میکند.
میزبانانِ شما در این نشست:
مجری:مهدی جلیلی
منتقد:علیاصغر کیانی
زمان و مکان دیدار ما:
📅 تاریخ:۵ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
⏰ ساعت:۶ تا ۸ عصر
📍 نشانی:خیابان ملاقاتی، نبش ملاقاتی ۱۰
حضور برای تمامی علاقهمندان آزاد است.
چشمبهراهِ دیدارتان هستیم
گزارش نشست انجمن «دوشنبههای شعر گرگان»
نشست این هفته انجمن دوشنبههای شعر گرگان که با اجرای هنرمندانه خانم ریحانه دانشدوست آغاز شد، رنگوبویی از دلتنگی داشت؛ چرا که آغازگرِ این نشست، یاد و خاطره دو تن از چهرههای فرهنگی و هنری شهر، زندهیاد آقای شیخحسینی و زندهیاد آقای کریمالله قائمی بود که اخیراً رخ در نقاب خاک کشیدهاند. یادشان در این محفل ادبی گرامی داشته شد تا چراغِ نام و آثارشان همچنان در محافل هنری روشن ب…
درگذشت پیشکسوت نام آشنای عرصه فرهنگ گرگان، استاد کریم الله قائمی را به اهالی فرهنگ، ادب و هنر و خانواده آن مرحوم تسلیت میگوییم.
مراسم تشییع روز سه شنبه ۳۰ تیر ۱۴۰۵ ساعت ۹ صبح از مقابل تالار فخرالدین اسعد گرگانی
مجلس ترحیم نیز در همین روز در امامزاده عبدالله(سالن امام علی(ع))ساعت ۵ تا ۶:۳۰
«نشست هفتگی شعر دوشنبههای گرگان»
با سلام و احترام،
دوستان و دوستداران هنر شعر و ادبیات،
بدین وسیله از شما دعوت میشود تا در نشست هفتگی «دوشنبههای گرگان» که فضایی برای تلاقی کلمات و احساسات است، با ما همراه باشید.
در این نشست، شاهد اجرای ویژهی سرکار خانم ریحانه دانشدوست خواهیم بود و همچنین از حضور و سخنان ارزشمند کارشناس ادبی جناب آقای محمد فرازجو بهرهمند خواهیم شد.
📅 زمان: دوشنبه ۲۹ تیرماه
🕕 ساعت: ۱۸:۰۰ الی ۲…
گزارش نشست انجمن «دوشنبههای شعر گرگان»
🗓 دوشنبه،۲۲ تیرماه ۱۴۰۵
عصر دوشنبه، سرای انجمنهای هنری استان گلستان بار دیگر میزبان جمعی از شاعران و دوستداران ادبیات بود؛ محفلی گرم و صمیمی با اجرای هنرمندانهی ریحانه دانشدوست که در هوای تابستانی گرگان، رنگ و طعم شعر را در فضا میپراکند.
در آغاز، یاد دوست و شاعر پیشکسوت، عضو مهربان انجمن؛ استاد قاسم شیخحسینی که به تازگی آسمانی گردید، با خواندن اشعارش گرامی داشته شد.
سپس…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @litgol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 413,524 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دوشنبههای شعر گرگان” (@litgol), 169 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/litgol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.