Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

литература и котики \ ЕГЭ и ОГЭ стадикэтс

@litandcats

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,577subscribers

-84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002170955908
TypeChannel
Username@litandcats
Descriptionлюблю литературу всем сердцем — дарю эту любовь ученикам ❤️ по вопросам сюда: @lit_and_cats 📚 ЕГЭ и ОГЭ 😲 сдала четырежды ЕГЭ на 100 💯 142 стобалльника и более 1000 высокобалльников
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/litandcats

Growth

11,56411,66111,612.57 August 2026 — 11,661 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,661 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,649 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,638 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,621 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,599 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,577 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,564 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,577 subscribers11,5777 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,549–11,676 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:3611,577+13
12 Aug 2026, 23:2311,564-13
12 Aug 2026, 00:2211,577-22
11 Aug 2026, 02:3211,599-22
9 Aug 2026, 23:3111,621-17
9 Aug 2026, 02:0111,638-11
8 Aug 2026, 02:5511,649-12
7 Aug 2026, 13:1611,661no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:0911,661first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.72%
avg views ÷ 11,577 subscribers
Avg views / post
894
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held32 (4 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total28,616
Reactions total1,343
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,760
Videos
136
Links
875

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,343 reactions across 32 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 526710961561877045742331.5%
💋30222.5%
🥰24017.9%
😍23517.5%
😭957.07%
❤‍🔥272.01%
💯141.04%
🎉70.521%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,343reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 32 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @litandcats. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC427 views48 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

эстетика героев рассказа Максима Горького «Старуха Изергиль» ✨

💋25🥰13custom 526710961561877045710

14 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC827 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

а огэшки наши сегодня на вебе по русскому разбирают частые ошибки на экзамене ❤️ и средства выразительности наши тоже там есть!! 😎 кто сдает огэ в этом году — бегом на веб к Ане! буду потом вас спрашивать по этой теме хахахах

🥰24

13 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,040 views71 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😍36custom 526710961561877045719💋16

12 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC≈1,100 views80 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

такой у меня контекст: пересматриваю в последние дни мультики про богатырей кстати, самые первые — такие крутые! которые про алёшу, добрыню и илью отдельно я уже и забыла этот прайм... и вместе с этим — перечитывала "слово о полку игореве"! разбирала сюжет, переделывала конспект, готовила новый урок для учеников 🌸📔 преисполнилась я духом русским

😭49💋17🥰12custom 52671096156187704572

12 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,020 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🤩 русская литература х «Одиссея» Кристофера Нолана подметили, как перекликаются образы персонажей фильма с героями русской классики 🔜

💋27🥰9

12 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC953 views31 reactionsread 15 August 2026

если кратко: на авось уже не прокатит хотя и раньше не прокатывало, если честно) именно поэтому сегодня высокие баллы получают те, кто готовится системно: 🤎 читает произведения целиком или глубоко разбирает текст и ключевые эпизоды, а не ограничивается поверхностными краткими содержаниями 🤎 регулярно решает задания формата ЕГЭ и анализирует варианты прошлых лет 🤎 уделяет внимание не только самым известным произведе

😍14🥰10💋7

12 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC885 views53 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

😳 что меняется в ЕГЭ по литературе? на самом деле изменения происходят уже несколько лет! экзамен постепенно уходит от проверки знания сюжета и всё чаще требует глубокого анализа текста и понимания авторской позиции что мы уже видим, читайте на картинках 👇

😍26😭17🥰8💋2

12 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC813 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026

хочу сегодня с вами поговорить про изменения и тенденции в ЕГЭ по литературе ✍️ мы с командой тщательно проанализировали задания этого года и пришли к некоторым выводам! есть, чем с вами поделиться 🔜

😍24💋5custom 52671096156187704575

11 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,040 views78 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

«вишнёвый сад» за 10 минут! сегодня вспоминаем все самые важные эпизоды произведения 💫

😍45custom 526710961561877045716💋15🥰2

11 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC835 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

в последнее время всё чаще смотрю на киндл... не хочу совершать импульсивную покупку, поэтому пока просто присматриваюсь 👀 я не так часто читаю бумажные книги. обычно увлекаюсь ими летом, либо же перед сном — рядом с кроватью у меня всегда парочка книг лежит 📚 а так, в течение года я много путешествую и работаю — в такие периоды мне проще с электронными книгами. 👩‍💻 люблю читать на айпаде: его всегда удобно постав

💋25🥰13custom 52671096156187704576

10 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC894 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ой, а скоро этот вайб уже будет… 🤭🍁❤️ кто ждёт осень? или, напротив, не хочется, чтобы лето кончалось?)

custom 526710961561877045760😭21😍13

10 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC994 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

уже прослушала уроки и прошла тестик !! Марина оооооочень круто рассказывает, ее невероятно приятно слушать даже если уже знаешь материал 🙌🙌🙌 и тест очень подробный, видно, что вдумчиво составлялся 🫶

custom 526710961561877045723😍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @litandcats. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 315,468 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“литература и котики \ ЕГЭ и ОГЭ стадикэтс” (@litandcats), 11,577 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/litandcats.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.