Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +4,085. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,472–21,973 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 10:22
21,192
-14
16 Sept 2026, 01:20
21,206
-28
14 Sept 2026, 09:55
21,234
-68
12 Sept 2026, 16:21
21,302
-36
10 Sept 2026, 12:35
21,338
+544
7 Sept 2026, 09:01
20,794
+755
4 Sept 2026, 11:58
20,039
+331
2 Sept 2026, 20:38
19,708
+616
1 Sept 2026, 16:44
19,092
+120
31 Aug 2026, 15:23
18,972
+70
30 Aug 2026, 14:57
18,902
+62
29 Aug 2026, 18:04
18,840
+78
28 Aug 2026, 20:52
18,762
+96
27 Aug 2026, 23:56
18,666
+29
27 Aug 2026, 02:05
18,637
+41
26 Aug 2026, 04:08
18,596
+56
25 Aug 2026, 03:25
18,540
+56
23 Aug 2026, 23:25
18,484
+104
22 Aug 2026, 03:46
18,380
+81
20 Aug 2026, 19:45
18,299
first reading
Engagement
268 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.93%
avg views ÷ 21,192 subscribers
Avg views / post
832
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 268 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
268 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
19,134
Reactions total
231
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 20s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,185 reactions across 243 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,643
39.3%
🍓
672
16.1%
🍌
486
11.6%
🔥
289
6.91%
💘
222
5.30%
❤🔥
120
2.87%
⚡
112
2.68%
💔
102
2.44%
🥰
101
2.41%
🤯
74
1.77%
👍
70
1.67%
🌚
59
1.41%
🦄
34
0.812%
😭
27
0.645%
💋
25
0.597%
🏆
20
0.478%
👏
18
0.43%
💯
16
0.382%
🐳
15
0.358%
😁
14
0.335%
13 further kinds
66
1.58%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 244 of the 268 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 268 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ребят, а вы видели вообще, что там происходит в канале в(ы)пускного?
Там вообще-то имя первого секретного гостя раскрыли!!!
Это будет сами зайдите и узнайте 😯😯😯
В честь такого крутого события в канале в(ы)пускного проводится розыгрыш, который позволит вам повысить ваш билет до VIP и получить дополнительные фотосессии с преподами, мерч и другие плюшки!!!
Кстати, мероприятие бесплатное, так что попасть на него смогу…
Все, кого я напугала в посте выше — извините(((
Материала правда будет очень много...
НО
мы всё успеем!
Достаточно просто ходить на уроки, вовремя сдавать домашки, не писать сочики через ИИшку, сохранять материалы, которыми я буду делиться на платформе, и всё! Этого вам будет БОЛЕЕ ЧЕМ ДОСТАТОЧНО для получения высоких результатов! 😔😔
Курс продуман до мелочей + у вас будет большой планер, который вы сможете использ…
Молодцы! Как и обещала — ловите шпору 🤩
Несколько страниц из моего конспекта с Годового курса — обязательно сохраните!
Вот прям обязательно!!!
Запомните: если вы так и не прочитаете это произведение, а оно попадётся вам на ЕГЭ, это будет фиаско 😯😭
ХОА ХОА ХОА ХОАААааа....
*сны десятиклассников осенью после осознания, что в этом году придётся прочитать «Войну и мир» полностью*
Как вам такой сумеречно-литературный каст?)
🤩Белла Ростова
🤩Эдвард Болконский
🤩Джейкоб Безухов
🤩Виктория Курагина
🤩Джеймс Курагин
Если соберёте под этим постом 30 бананов, скину вам шпору по «Войне и миру» 🍌💃
‼️ В честь Трёхлетки решила провести розыгрыш 2 бесплатных мест на Бибиблиотеку или Литкайф
Условия очень простые: нужно быть подписанным на меня и на каналы моих коллег:
🤩 Костя Макиенко — русский язык
🤩 Вера Флекс — русский язык
🤩 Абидуби — математика
🤩 Стас Экспонента — математика
🤩 Настя Калиганова — английский язык
🤩 Настя Коржева — обществознание
🤩 Маша Вайб — обществознание
Итоги подведём 7 сентября в 18:00…
Сделала себе подарок на 1 сентября 💃💃
Шикарный сборник статей с сайта «Полка» — еще в свое время я почитывала там статьи для подготовки к ЕГЭ.
НО!!!! Там статьи современные, что не всегда совпадает с учебниками литературы в школе и, соответственно, с анализами фипи.
не зная требований огэ/егэ, легко вот так в интернетике нагуглить всяких интерпретаций произведений, а на экзаменах получить обнуление 🤡
Так что буд…
Всех с 1 сентября, ребят!!! 🔔🍂
Делитесь своими фотографиями с линейки, посмотрю на вас 😀
У меня, кстати, не было ни одного Первого сентября, когда бы я стояла на линейке. Начальную школу не помню, но вот с 5 класса я каждый год выступала: рассказывала стихи, пела, танцевала! Иногда делала всё сразу 💃💃💃
P.S. Если что, на фотографии я не плачу ахахаххаха
❤35🔥5👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 268 posts we hold for @lit_oge100points. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@lit_oge100points edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 54 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Фамусов называет Чацкого опасным человеком, потому что:
Чацкий хочет украсть Софью21%
Чацкий - сплетник8%
Чацкий - вольнодумец62%
Чацкий - шулер9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 268 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Русский язык с Аришей | 10 класс | 100балльный @rusoge100points · 21,594#1
Дядя Артем | Математика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @molodoy_repet · 67,563#2
Федос Кокос | Биология ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @fedos_kokos_100b · 46,324#3
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Саша Тёплая | Математика 5-8 классы | 100балльный репетитор @teplya_sasha · 22,271 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
Русский язык с Аришей | 10 класс | 100балльный @rusoge100points · 21,594 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 September 2026
Федос Кокос | Биология ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @fedos_kokos_100b · 46,324 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Настя Коржева | Обществознание ЕГЭ и ОГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @socegeanastasia · 61,936 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Дядя Артем | Математика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @molodoy_repet · 67,563 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
Азат Адеев | Физика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @fizikaoge · 81,883 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Мать стобалльников | Литература ЕГЭ | Фариша Князева | Мария Коршунова | 100балльный репетитор @korshunova100ballov · 27,156 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
Даша Шарит | Даша Королёва | ОГЭ литература 2027 | Умскул @lublu_litry · 52,251 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
Вадим Едемский I Химия ОГЭ и ЕГЭ I 100балльный репетитор @vademistry100b · 34,628 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Илья Сагалов | Информатика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @iliiasagalov_100points · 28,061 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 September 2026
Таня Шибитова | Английский ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @tanya_shibitova · 33,698 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
Топ-репетитор | ЕГЭ история | 100балльный репетитор🇷🇺 @topkirill · 40,081 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
МатемАня | Математика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор | Мать наук @matemanya · 44,270 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алёна Туренко | Литература ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор” (@lit_oge100points), 21,192 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lit_oge100points.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.