Channel
@listovart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
695subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001727113259 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @listovart |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/listovart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 695 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 695 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (3 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,237 |
| Reactions total | 113 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
237 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 58 | 24.5% | |
| 🔥 | 58 | 24.5% | |
| 😁 | 37 | 15.6% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 8.44% | |
| 👀 | 18 | 7.59% | |
| 💘 | 14 | 5.91% | |
| 🤔 | 14 | 5.91% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.11% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 1.69% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.844% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.844% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.844% | |
| custom 5244568390298778081 | 1 | 0.422% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.422% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.422% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Удивительно, но последние месяцы я очень часто думал про кино, режиссуру, клипы и в целом про большие для меня истории, которыми я всегда хотел заниматься, но честно побаивался, так для меня это что-то очень большое, важное и ценное. И в чем собственно говоря «диво», сейчас я работаю над своим коротким метром работа над которым уже идет, начал работу над проектом где мне нужно сделать mixed media анимацию, которая бу…
❤🔥29🔥5🏆1💘1
Мало сюда стал кончено писать и что-то рассказывать, хотя мыслей и перемен очень много, но пока в них нет подкрепления действием, точнее действием которое можно было бы зафиксировать как-то почему-то думаю, что нет смысла о чем-то писать или не делаю этого чтобы не обманывать мозг этим фантомным результатом (когда ты делишься чем-то что собираешься сделать получаешь дозу дофамина такую же как если бы уже сделал это) …
💘13🔥1🫡1
Преподаватель по Английскому написал -Dmitry I uploaded some new word for you in Quizlet On of these words….
😁6
🤔
👀12🗿2😁2
Это просто пиздец как ахуенно... Это арт дирекшн студия by Christopher Simmonds, который переосмыслевает фешн фотографию и у бро даже нет инсты, но он делает компейны для Valentino, Gucci, Dior, Disel, Miu Miu итд Надеюсь когда нибудь кто-то напишет про меня такое же сообщение https://www.simmondsltd.com/info
❤🔥8🤓3
Делаем 🍋🍋🍋?
😁19💯8👏1🤓1
В посте выше говорил о «деньгах за работу». Я подозревал, что может создаться впечатление, что я с однобокой позицией - в данном случае клиента ругаю прохиндеев, которые ни за что просят деньги. НО Это не так, во-первых я по эту же сторону «прохиндейства». Во-вторых речь шла немного о другом. Что я имел в виду? Иногда люди заигрывают с эго и их ПРАВОМ получить оплату за их работу, безусловно это право есть и не стоит…
🔥9🫡1😢1
Бля, вот люди ноют, что у них нет работы Я искал смм/маркетологов Взял на тест 7 человек 2 из них даже ничего не скинули 3 скинули одинаковые сценарии из чат гпт 2х я еще жду но они единственные подают надежды так как задавали вопросы по теме и в целом есть ощущение, что могут что-то выдать не из гпт блять Просто сюр, да чеки не большие, но и задача тупо креативы в формате тг текста написать без оформления При том…
❤🔥21💯9🤔7🔥1
Может тут у меня есть или кто-то знает такого человека SMM/ Маркетолог который может писать креативы под ролики (Уже нашел)
Блять, зашел на почту и проебал 2 очень важных письма одно от бренда twojeys а второе от крупного продакшена Пиздец чекайте почту….
🔥25
А кто-то хочет со мной в коммерческие проекты заходить? Иногда большой нагруз и нужен сапорт основной тиме. Интересуют надежные и ответственные нейронщики грамотные, которые разбираются в этом не просто купили подписку на хигсфилда, с базой поста в ае или в любых других софтах Если еще и 3д база есть ну ваще песня (капкатисты просьба мимо) Напишите @dlistov сразу с портфелем (умоляю не кидайте Яндекс диски и прочее…
👀6
Думаю это связано и с соц сетями, тем как они влияют на нас и смене фокуса в комерческие проекты для заработка. Уточню, что ничего против соц. сетей я не имею и нужно держать в голове специфику их работы и применять в свою пользу, но не становиться заложником алгоритмов-это тонкая грань, которую сложно удержать, но на мой взгляд вопрос "А вот эта работа в ней есть я? или в ней алгоритмы, зрители, алчность и желание …
👏4🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @listovart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 973,476 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DMITRY LISTOV” (@listovart), 695 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/listovart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.