новый опрос
- 🤩13%
- 🕺22%
- 🙂37%
- 🐠28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2❤🔥2

Channel
@lisoonchiks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
80subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002198156915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lisoonchiks |
| Description | хаюшки!❤️ это мой ТГК в котором я буду выкладывать процесс своих ами и многое другое🫶 лс владельца: @lisoonchic YouTube✨🌈: https://youtube.com/@lisoonchik?si=6Ph3dj4jwB_BfAGO вк✨🌈: https://vk.com/lisoonchik_official Like:✨🌈: |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lisoonchiks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 80 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 80 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 9 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
135 reactions across 13 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 23.0% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5271905019619186820 | 10 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5199467741882359748 | 8 | 5.93% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 5.93% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 5.19% | |
| 🗿 | 7 | 5.19% | |
| custom 5409052696999108213 | 6 | 4.44% | |
| custom 5208865040131715147 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 2.96% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 2.96% | |
| custom 5287649871510133815 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| custom 5262995449266057136 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5449692016856283177 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5017056082774721550 | 1 | 0.741% | |
| 5 further kinds | 5 | 3.70% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2025 to 4 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lisoonchiks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2025 to 4 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
новый опрос
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2❤🔥2
а всм рыба побеждает
❤4❤🔥1
это очень важно
❤2💘2
что на быструю реакцию ставить😭😭😭😭😭😭
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
с нг
❤3
куку
❤4😱1
браточки, подписочку на лайфец оформляем, я там активна🥺❤️🩹 https://t.me/lisKa_pisKaa
💘3❤2
ребят, я походу совсем ухожу из бк..💔 на это есть несколько причин: 1️⃣) учёба, у меня сейчас и так завал, сами понимаете, плести нет времени😭 2️⃣) выгораниееее. я ничего не могу с этим поделать, совсем не хочу смотреть на бисер🙏💔 сейчас я очень активна в лайфе, оформляем подписончик😼 так же я снимаю в ютюб и лайк (ссылки в описании канала)✨ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ лайк: @lisoonchik (забыла в описание ссылку впихнуть😳) спасибо ещ…
😢12🗿2💘1😱1
друзья, походу кое кто опять словила выгорание😭, я конечно постараюсь плести но думаю, это будет не часто🙁 у меня есть несколько недоделок/работ которые я вам не показала, буду постить это😊 сейчас я хочу сделать большой акцент именно на ютюб канал, буду снимать для вас ролики из жизни и просто показывать вам свои работы в рилсах❤️✨🌈 на этом всё, оформляем подписочку на мой ютюбчек (ссылочка в описании канала)🙂💋
😢4custom 52719050196191868204custom 52876498715101338153❤2💘1🗿1
💙🔠🔠🔠🔠💙 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🌟🐠это рыбка Немо🐠🌟 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩🤩очень давно хотела сплести его и именно в этих цветах, безумно нравится результат🤩🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 💙🐠трудностей в плетении не возникло, схемка качественная и бесплатная🐠💙 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 😘🤩на этом всё, давайте реакций накидаем?)🤩😘 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🌊🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🌊
custom 51994677418823597488🐳6❤3💋2custom 54496920168562831772⚡1🔥1🗿1
💃🔠🔠🔠🔠💃 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 💎🌈это такой миленький дракончик вия на тестик🌈💎 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 🦋✨сплела очень быстро, за один вечер, трудностей в плетении не возникло✨🦋 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 🐈🤩очень нравится сочетание цветов, яркий такой🤩🐈 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 🎶😋не знаю что ещё про него сказать, но реакций?)😋🎶 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 💛🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠💛
custom 52719050196191868206❤3🍾1🎉1🔥1🗿1😍1😱1
💗🤩😍😗☺️💗 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🩷☁️наконец я готова вам представить своего ушанчика - легенду бк☁️🩷 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🩷🎀начинала я его ещё в прошлом году по мк, но закончила только сейчас (в июле), лежал он у меня инвалидом без лап, ахах🎀🩷 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩🤩мне он очень нравится, такой нежненький и вкусненький🤩🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🎀💝не знаю что ещё про него сказать, давайте накидаем реакций)💝🎀 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🌟😘😅😀😉😋🙃🙃🌟
custom 54090526969991082136custom 52629954492660571362❤1🍾1🐳1💘1🔥1🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lisoonchiks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
новый опрос
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
что на быструю реакцию ставить😭😭😭😭😭😭
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2025 to 4 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,205,246 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌈✨𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕠𝕠𝕟𝕔𝕙𝕚𝕜_𝕓𝕚𝕤𝕖𝕣𝕣𝕣✨🌈” (@lisoonchiks), 80 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lisoonchiks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.