Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

лысый бодер / прайс, отзывы

@lisiy_price

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

75subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002396199685
TypeChannel
Username@lisiy_price
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lisiy_price

Growth

747574.57 August 2026 — 74 subscribers9 August 2026 — 74 subscribers15 August 2026 — 75 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 11:1775+1
9 Aug 2026, 22:0174no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:1774first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 27 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3248.5%
👍1015.2%
🔥913.6%
🫡57.58%
👌46.06%
😱46.06%
❤‍🔥23.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2025 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC132 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

спина и шире и суше, мясо торчит прям

4

30 Mar 2026, 10:07 UTC363 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

где-то десятку скинули, идем дальше, силовые умудряемся наращивать, с учетом что ест меньше чем требую, но зато говнецо уходит активно

4

26 Dec 2025, 19:52 UTC792 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

-15кг гдет за 5 месяцев, плавно, без запретов, без голода, короче все как я люблю, продолжаем работать, сделаем красоту к лету💪

5🔥3

8 Dec 2025, 23:11 UTC820 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

кайфую люто вот так пересматривать старые видосы подопечных понимая через что мы прошли, работаем уже ровно год посмотрите как нелепо он жмет эти 50кг! да тут и визуально видно, как он поздоровел, сегодня был тест 1пм, зафиксировали 107.5кг обычно мы просто качаемся, но иногда проходим силовые периоды, за 8 недель прибавили 12.5кг в жиме, определенно- потенциал у него хороший

4👍3🔥2

6 Dec 2025, 13:56 UTC685 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

прошли с подопечным цикл по подтягиваниям, не смотря на некоторые проебы, доп. физическую активность и тд, неплохо спрогрессировали 5пм с 10кг вырос до 8пм 1пм был поставлен с 27.5кг 1пм вначале цикла не тестили, но определенно он бы столько не подтянулся 1 видео- тест 5пм вначале цикла 2 видео- тест насколько вырос 5пм в конце цикла 3 видео- тест 1пм в конце цикла да на первом видео он сделал 4 раза, турник уебан

👍4

2 Nov 2025, 22:08 UTC699 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

два новых отзыва, всех обнял 💪🫶

3👍2🔥2

18 Oct 2025, 23:39 UTC740 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

кста с соней до сих пор треним, уже почти год, объемы радуют, растем☝️

4😱4❤‍🔥2👍1🔥1

14 Sept 2025, 22:39 UTC811 viewsread 9 August 2026

цены чуть повысил, для тех кто сейчас работает со мной цена пока что та же.

27 May 2025, 11:52 UTC980 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

результат за ~4 месяца, продолжаем работать, не голодаем👌 надеюсь все понимают что строительство тела это длительный процесс?!

8🫡5👌4

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @lisiy_price. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 368,150 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“лысый бодер / прайс, отзывы” (@lisiy_price), 75 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lisiy_price.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.