Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💵Финансовый Завтрак с Елизаветой Филипенко

Channel

💵Финансовый Завтрак с Елизаветой Филипенко

@lisaproinvest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

323subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002129475361
TypeChannel
Username@lisaproinvest
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lisaproinvest

Growth

323324323.57 August 2026 — 324 subscribers8 August 2026 — 324 subscribers14 August 2026 — 323 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 323–324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:47323-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:20324no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:21324first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 323 subscribers
Avg views / post
65.2
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total847
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7672.4%
👍1312.4%
🔥109.52%
21.90%
👀21.90%
🙏21.90%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC39 viewsread 8 August 2026

Как думаете, сколько еще наши российские продавцы на вб продержатся? 🙄

5 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC36 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @shuohuaxia

Wildberries в 20 раз снизил стоимость регистрации для китайских продавцов — с 10 000 до 500 юаней. Каждый предприниматель до конца августа может создать до 10 личных кабинетов.

3 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC52 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ух, провели сегодня консультацию по инвестициям. Это дело интересное, но и энерго-затратное)) Сначала - проверить анкету инвестора, потом составить шаблон инвест-плана, потом обсудить все лично, потом скорректировать и отправить доп. Файлы 🤩 А дальше - контрольная точка через полгода. Даже если инвестировать по 3-5 тысяч ежемесячно - через несколько лет у вас будет капитал, который будет вас радовать и кормить 👍🏼

6🙏2

31 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC70 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У кого есть счета в ФД Амаль? Видели акцию? 😉 Я тоже пользуюсь их услугами, но основную Ставку на этот вид инвестиций не делаю. Да, для сохранности капитала и немного восполнить инфляцию. Для меня брокерский счет - в приоритете. Но если у вас короткие цели ( 🎯 особенно накопления до 1 года!) - акции вам не подойдут, нужны консервативные инструменты. Если вам нужна консультация по достижению ваших финансовых целей

4

30 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC63 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

… Ребенку 5 лет, мать задолбала со своими прописями 😂 Верхнее - это в 4 года писал, а нижнее - сейчас, в 5. Говорю -пиши, спасибо потом скажешь, красивый почерк никогда не выйдет из моды) может и учителя тоже спасибо скажут 😂😂💪🏼 Скажите, исходя из вашего опыта - какие простые действия могут взращивать полезные навыки у детей?)

7

29 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC56 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто еще не знает, откуда берется Нобелевская премия? Почитайте, вдохновитесь))

👍4🔥32

28 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC59 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я изучаю варианты по недвижимости в Питере и в Барнауле. Вот что значит не искать самому, а обратиться к эксперту- тут с порога тебе уже говорят то, что ты сам никогда бы не узнал 😁💪🏼 Я считаю, что хочешь сделать хорошо и минимум ошибок - обратись к специалисту. Из интересного - вот не могу понять, почему стоимость квадрата в новостройках в Барнауле и в Питере стоят одинаково? 😡 200-250 тысяч рублей. Как обстоят

4👀2👍2

27 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC67 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

… послушайте прекрасного Уильяма Бернстайна, если думаете, что сейчас не подходящее время для инвестиций или переживаете за свои портфели 😉💪🏼 Любый кризисы заканчиваются ростом, но и после роста всегда бывает падение. Это вопрос времени Выигрывает тот, кто знает это простое правило и спокойно действует дальше по плану👍🏼 Книга 📚 всего 15 стр, вторая часть сильно направлена на реалии США, адаптировать под РФ можно у

7

26 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Балуюсь, у кого есть Likee? 😂 https://l.likee.video/v/G7sck6 Всем хороших выходных 😉

2

22 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC96 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Книга на выходные вам 😉🚀 Аудио-версия

👍62

20 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC96 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Перфекционизм- очень вредное качество. Кажется, что в голове ты все делаешь идеально. Но на деле 90% перфекционистов не делают ничего, потому что «или идеально, или никак» - такой подход в личных финансах, накоплениях, инвестициях и планировании - тоже играет против нас. Почему? Мы отказываемся от маленьких шагов и дисциплины, откладываем свои желания и цели, а время уходит. И потом люди с сожалением думают - поче

7👍1

19 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC73 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Уроки для инвесторов Аудио книга: 📚 воспоминания биржевого спекулянта #обзоркниг@lisaproinvest

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lisaproinvest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 952,290 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💵Финансовый Завтрак с Елизаветой Филипенко” (@lisaproinvest), 323 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lisaproinvest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.