Video, posted without a caption

Channel
Lisafieva_beauty
@lisafievabeauty
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
965subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001704348937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lisafievabeauty |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lisafievabeauty |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 965 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:15 | 974 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 982 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 985 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 988 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 988 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 46s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😍 | 12 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5336835016645161604 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5260504497083401129 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5244512512774266670 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5258162318272899514 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5400203178878732670 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.08% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Кожа на ногах со второго раза, уже реагирует намного спокойнее после ЭЭ (1 фото) После первого раза были красные точки еще неделю наверное (2 фото) это на следующий день после эпиляции. Вообще никакой реакции почти С усами было так же, с каждым разом все меньше реакции кожи😍 🫢-больше не показывай такое 🙂-интересно
🤩2custom 52445125127742666702
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
😍3
Я сначала не хотела его брать, но меня убедили, что это классная вещь В итоге я в восторге от результата🤩 🔥Экономия своих продуктов, и самого разбавителя. 🔥Продукт становится очень пластичный и ложится тонко, не теряя своих свойств и качеств! Девки, короче советую🤌🏻
😍2👍1custom 54002031788787326701
Video message, posted without a caption
😱1
Урвала за 700₽🙀 Сейчас уже 1800₽ Но качество 🔥
👍2custom 53368350166451616042😍1
Косищааа какая😍 Для кого-то может это и крысиный хвост… Но для меня это хороший промежуточный результат Где беру: оф сайт Fabao.ru На МП подделки. Из Китая тоже едут подделки. Будьте аккуратнее. Проверяйте. Мой промокод проверяйте, должен работать Lisafieva10 Какой взять: 101B универсальный Как использовать: один раз вечером 3-5 мл. Не смывать 6-8 часов. Не жирнит. Это лосьон. 1 месяц может усилится впадение. 2-3…
😍2custom 53368350166451616042custom 54002031788787326701
🩵 @oksana_pavlidi
custom 52581623182728995142😍1custom 53368350166451616041
Video message, posted without a caption
🤣2custom 52605044970834011291
Видали какой кайф ловлю? А всё, а всё😀 Детей вернули с дачи и я снова мать СДВГ
custom 52605044970834011292💯1
370тыс 🤪 Решила ПРОСТО примерить бриллианты. Кажется мне идет 🤭
👍4💯4😍2😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lisafievabeauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lisafieva_beauty” (@lisafievabeauty), 965 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lisafievabeauty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.