Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 254 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 97 days, net -1,616. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,734–32,834 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 09:06
30,976
-1
9 Nov 2026, 13:57
30,977
-5
8 Nov 2026, 07:49
30,982
-2
7 Nov 2026, 05:29
30,984
-1
6 Nov 2026, 04:28
30,985
-3
5 Nov 2026, 06:05
30,988
-3
4 Nov 2026, 02:30
30,991
-1
3 Nov 2026, 04:51
30,992
-2
2 Nov 2026, 06:09
30,994
-3
1 Nov 2026, 07:00
30,997
-6
31 Oct 2026, 06:27
31,003
-2
30 Oct 2026, 07:06
31,005
-32
29 Oct 2026, 04:37
31,037
-12
28 Oct 2026, 02:29
31,049
-2
27 Oct 2026, 00:46
31,051
-1
26 Oct 2026, 01:36
31,052
-2
24 Oct 2026, 22:16
31,054
-1
24 Oct 2026, 00:08
31,055
-12
22 Oct 2026, 21:11
31,067
-15
21 Oct 2026, 17:38
31,082
first reading
Engagement
254 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.4%
avg views ÷ 30,976 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,560
79 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
79
of 254 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
254 (30 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
597,400
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 23:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,320
Videos
≈734
Links
≈1,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21m 28s
Average length
1m 08s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
0.787%
2 of 254 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
6,350
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
6,370
over 252 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwLP2VA
1
30 September 2026
30 September 2026
2VtzqwdWvXV
1
3 September 2026
3 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 254 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 79 posts held from the last 30 days (6.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🏚 Холодные квартиры и грязные подъезды: липецкая УК «Перспектива» лишилась лицензии
С сегодняшнего дня, 11 ноября, «Перспектива», обслуживающая 58 многоквартирных домов, лишается лицензии. Об этом сообщил мэр Михаил Щербаков. Компания стала уже шестой управляющей организацией в Липецке, оставшейся без лицензии в этом году.
Мы недавно рассказывали о поездке мэра по домам, жители которых жаловались на холодные батаре…
⛽ Снова по 30 литров: на липецкие заправки «Роснефти» вернулись ограничения
Липецким автомобилистам снова предлагают вспомнить знакомое: не больше 30 литров бензина в бак, в канистры не наливают. По информации областного министерства энергетики и тарифов, такие правила действуют на АЗС «Роснефти». Другие сети, по сообщению ведомства, работают без ограничений.
Возвращение «чёт-нечёта» пока не объявлено — такое решен…
🥶 Родители школы № 68 жалуются на холод. Ремонт отопления пока внесли в проект бюджета
В липецкой школе № 68 плохо работает отопление. Родители направили коллективное обращение в горсовет с просьбой провести капремонт: по их словам, в здании холодно, дети часто болеют. На комиссии по образованию депутат Юрий Шкарин подтвердил, что ему тоже поступали жалобы на отопление.
Школу построили в 1988 году. В марте специали…
🗿 Ленина на Соколе вернули без привычного лица. ЛДПР просит вмешаться прокуратуру
Памятник Ленину на площади Константиновой после ремонта стал поводом для обращения в прокуратуру. Липецкое отделение ЛДПР заявило, что жители жалуются на изменившийся облик скульптуры и опасаются её падения. По данным партии, монумент вернули на постамент 6 ноября — к годовщине Октябрьской революции.
Описание результата у либерал-демо…
👮 С Днём полиции, Липецк!
Сегодня поздравляем тех, кому по работе достаётся город без прикрас. Ночные вызовы, семейные скандалы, поиски пропавших, аварии и разговоры с людьми, которые только что отдали мошенникам все сбережения. За каждой такой историей — человек, которому нужна помощь.
В Липецке, Ельце, Грязях и небольших сёлах хорошего полицейского ценят за вполне простые вещи: приехал, выслушал, разобрался, не о…
🎄 До оливье ещё 52 дня, а у Комсомольского пруда уже Новый год
Сегодня утром у пруда установили световые конструкции «С Новым годом» и «Свечи». Следом сотрудники «Липецкгорсвета» планируют собрать праздничную карету. Ноябрь ещё толком не освоился, а ему уже намекают, что пора уступать место мандаринам и вайбам зимней сказки.
Подготовка началась на прошлой неделе с проверки иллюминации. Параллельно город готовит мес…
🐷 Сало подождёт: фестиваль в Добром 21 ноября отменили
В Добром отменили гастрономический фестиваль «Доброе сало». Организаторы сослались на текущую ситуацию и факторы, влияющие на проведение массовых мероприятий, но конкретную причину не назвали. Окончательно прощаться с праздником пока не предлагают: новую дату обещают сообщить, когда определятся.
А ведь этот фестиваль умеет удивлять далеко не только ассортименто…
🚧 На Московской отремонтируют 550 метров дороги за сумму до 27 миллионов рублей
В Липецке ищут подрядчика для ремонта участка Московской — от остановки «Улица Московская» до площади Николая Великолепова, у съезда на Северный проезд. Начальная цена контракта — 27 млн рублей. Закончить работы должны до 31 августа 2027 года.
Деньги нашлись благодаря экономии на других дорожных торгах. Контракт на ремонт нескольких гор…
💰 Почти треть работников Липецкой области получает меньше 45 тысяч. Вот вам и средняя зарплата
Меньше 45 тысяч рублей в месяц на руки получают 30,9% работников Липецкой области. А зарплатой выше 200 тысяч могут похвастаться только 2,3% — примерно один человек из 43. Такие оценки приводит новое исследование РИА Новости.
Половина работников региона получает от 41 до 88 тысяч рублей. Этот диапазон рассчитали, убрав че…
🌦 Доброе утро, Липецк!
На неделе с 9 по 15 ноября погода попробует почти всё: небольшой дождь, мокрый снег и потепление до +11. Правда, самое приятное тепло достанется нам в комплекте с самой мокрой субботой.
Сегодня ожидается +5 и небольшой дождь. Вторник и среда, по прогнозу, пройдут без осадков: днём +5…+6. Это хорошие дни для прогулок, хотя в среду ветер может разгоняться в порывах до 10 м/с.
В четверг похолод…
🅿️ Ещё 2696 мест станут платными: Липецк расширяет парковочную зону с 16 ноября
В Липецке запускают второй этап платных парковок. К существующим добавят 26 участков — всего в городе будет больше 3500 платных машино-мест. О дате запуска сообщил мэр Михаил Щербаков.
Новые зоны появятся на участках Советской, Гагарина, Неделина, Фрунзе, Ворошилова, Первомайской и других улиц. В список также вошли площади Петра Великог…
🎭 Куда сходить в Липецке и области 6–8 ноября: Ханс Циммер при свечах, Ахматова в танце и Элли в волшебной стране
Пятницу проведем в Липецке. В субботу можно успеть в усадьбу, а к вечеру вернуться в город. Вот только между МакSим и «Рондо» всё-таки придётся выбирать — оба концерта начинаются ровно в семь. Ну а воскресенье — день семейно-культурный.
Пятница, 6 ноября
19:00 — саундтреки Ханса Циммера при свечах. В о…
Showing the 12 most recent of 254 posts we hold for @liptown. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@liptown edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Черноземец Z @blacklander · 48,396 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026
Чернозем @blackzemye · 18,702 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 October 2026
Беседки наседки @besedki_nasedki · 60,189 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
МИР Z @new_world_Z · 106,378 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Кулинария | Блюда @kulinar_b · 36,122 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
Страна Z @Z_strana · 110,357 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
Территориальное управление @terrupr · 79,986 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
9 утра | Новости и анонсы @v9utra · 73,197 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Итиль @itiltg · 74,581 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Липтаун” (@liptown), 30,976 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liptown.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.