и баловство с оформой
custom 54137081151304836335custom 54138164041409201791

Channel
@lippevehzel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
95subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002423645436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lippevehzel |
| Description | ИНФО: https://t.me/lippevehzel/244 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lippevehzel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 95 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 95 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (13 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 234 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
242 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5249009601231224691 | 53 | 21.9% | |
| custom 5413708115130483633 | 51 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5413342209686667225 | 39 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5413390815831557625 | 24 | 9.92% | |
| custom 5413796565686976061 | 18 | 7.44% | |
| custom 5413816404140920179 | 17 | 7.02% | |
| 💋 | 14 | 5.79% | |
| 💅 | 12 | 4.96% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 2.89% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 2.89% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lippevehzel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
и баловство с оформой
custom 54137081151304836335custom 54138164041409201791
Posted without readable text
custom 54137081151304836337custom 52490096012312246913custom 54138164041409201793💋1
Sticker, posted without a caption
💋5custom 54133422096866672251custom 54138164041409201791
и дня в России не провела, а уже какая-то хуйня
custom 54137965656869760619🕊3🙏2custom 54133422096866672252custom 54138164041409201791
сейчас регистрировались на рейс и мой багаж ровно 8кг, это буквально максимальный вес ручной клади втф 😢 а че я тогда делала в китая, раз так мало вещей накупила😒
custom 54137965656869760618🙏5custom 54133908158315576253custom 54137081151304836333
мы попали на выступление каких-то китайских тик-токеров возле тцешки😳😳😳 они такие красивые. а самое главное, у меня есть фото с одним из них😭 (он сказал, что я красивая🤩)
custom 524900960123122469111custom 54137081151304836335custom 54133422096866672254
туда сюда и выпускной
custom 54137081151304836338custom 54133908158315576256custom 52490096012312246915custom 54133422096866672253
сейчас собираем чемоданы просто чтоб поехать в другой город и я поняла, что не хочу уезжать из Китая😭 плевать на языковой барьер, здесь очень круто. вернусь сюда, чтоб открыть свою пекарню, а то некоторые булочки здесь до блетвотного маслянистые😭
custom 541334220968666722510💋7custom 54137081151304836333custom 54138164041409201792custom 54133908158315576251
самый лучший отдых, это отдых на пляже 🤩 #SEA_BREEZE_COLLAB
custom 524900960123122469134custom 541334220968666722514custom 541339081583155762512custom 54137081151304836334
🏄 SEA BREEZE COLLAB А вот и вторая часть нашего морского коллаба!!! Вы готовы, дети?? Я не слышу!!! 2️⃣0️⃣🔅0️⃣0️⃣ тиша 💙 (Банчан, Хан и Чанбин) коконато 💙 (Хенджин и Банчан) Liomini 💙 (от8) Tenka 💙 (Хан и Минхо) Lady 💙 (Банчан и Чанбин) ML4 💙 (Феликс, Сынмин и Чонин) иннер 💙 (Банчан) November Forest 💙 (Чонин) кошкомать 💙 (Минхо и Хан) Eprise Noelle 💙 (Хан и Минхо) Vehzel_ 💙 (Хенджин, Джисон и Феликс) dorriihyyq 💙 …
custom 54137081151304836335custom 54138164041409201793
ну и самая главное, двое китайцев попросили мой вичат 🤩 цель на эту неделю, что б хотя бы еще 2 его выпросили
custom 541370811513048363311custom 54138164041409201796💋1custom 54137965656869760611
итоги моей первой недели в китая. мы посетили площадь Тяньаньмэнь (мы отстали час в очереди на 35 градусной жаре, просто ради фотоотчета, что там были, нам ничего не рассказали даже). потом посетили летний дворец, где нас просто пустили в свободное плаванье (буквально, ведь начался дождь). в среду поехали на скоростном поезде до Даньдуна, где гуляли по мосту Ялу, с которого была видна Северная Корея, очень интересный…
💅12custom 54133422096866672255🕊4custom 54133908158315576252
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @lippevehzel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 868,023 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vehzel_ ✨” (@lippevehzel), 95 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lippevehzel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.