Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Липецкий инсайдер

@lipinsa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

99subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001439085710
TypeChannel
Username@lipinsa
DescriptionТолько проверенный инсайд #lipinsа #липинса Почта: lipinsa@protonmail.com
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lipinsa

Growth

996 August 2026 — 99 subscribers9 August 2026 — 99 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 11:0299no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:2899first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 16 September 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
267
Videos
60
Links
355

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁861.5%
🔥430.8%
👍17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2021 to 7 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2025, 06:00 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lipbudu

Токарев, вали ты уже в Великобританию. Правда ты там тоже нахрен никому не нужен…

🔥2

3 Aug 2025, 14:06 UTC129 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://t.me/obkom48/9505 Нормальное, интеллигентное лицо. По закону наверное все делал. Вот что за ряженные коммуняги?) сначала орут, а потом начинают разбираться что и как…

😁4

3 Aug 2025, 11:40 UTC74 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://t.me/onTokarevSergeyKPRF/4422 Стесняемся спросить! А где здесь поддержка СВО? Это Сталин чтоли СВО проводит или как понять?

😁4👍1

3 Aug 2025, 10:52 UTC55 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @licolipPhoto

Продолжаем внимательно наблюдать за происходящем в Липецком отделении КПРФ. Странно, что они из каждого утюга не симофорят о том, как провели позавчера автопробег. Который изначально хотели и планировали провести как победный, а получилось как похоронный. А был ли он заявлен и согласован? Интересно, когда правоохранительные органы заинтересуются и дадут законную правовую оценку этому публичному мероприятию, КПРФ опят

🔥2

1 Aug 2025, 05:33 UTC56 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lipbudu

Кстати. В суматохе тайных заговоров никто не обратил к внимания на вчерашнюю «встречу с избирателями» Полиночки Крюковой (внучки Николая Разворотнева) и почтидочери Токарева. На которую её почтипапа Токарев и по совсместительству начальник по партии пришел поддержать. В итоге все свелось к 40-ка минутам Токарева перед детьми о том, какой он замечательный, даже слова почтидочери Полиночке не дал сказать и не удосужилс

10 Sept 2024, 11:54 UTC136 viewsread 9 August 2026

Олеся конечно молодец. А она все еще депутат? https://t.me/stebaevo/130

9 Sept 2024, 12:46 UTC137 viewsread 9 August 2026

Красавчики!) Главное правильно посчитали!) https://t.me/obkom48/8033

9 Sept 2024, 06:17 UTC114 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pal_yeletsPhoto

Читать этим утром комментарии к оппозиционным пабликам - любо дорого. Столкновение с реальностью у политических клоунов получилось ужасающим. Не обходится без классики - "никто из моих знакомых за него не голосовал" и "я спрашивал всех моих друзей, они все за ХХХ". Наверное, стоит заводить круг друзей пошире. И включать в него людей поумнее 😊

8 Sept 2024, 15:48 UTC178 viewsread 9 August 2026

Напоминаем, что Шкатов - политическая проститутка! Которая долгое время подстилалась в партии Яблоко, а теперь депутат от КПРФ. Идеологии этих партии ну не пропорциональные, а диаметрально противоположные?) https://t.me/shkatov48/4098

8 Sept 2024, 13:49 UTC80 viewsread 9 August 2026

Сами пошли вон!) там такого не написано!) https://t.me/obkom48/8022

8 Sept 2024, 11:30 UTC80 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @hromovskayaPhoto

Товарищи из штаба КПРФ предоставили в моё распоряжение откровенно странный документ. Он представляет из себя особое мнение члена избирательной комиссии Липецкой области по поводу завершающейся избирательной кампании. Документ заканчивается тезисом о выражении недоверия «так называемым выборам губернатора Липецкой области» и ставится под сомнение их легитимность. Коллеги, ваша партия не смогла выдвинуть кандидатов в ч

8 Sept 2024, 06:42 UTC90 viewsread 9 August 2026

Выводите Копылову с избирательного участка, у нее пригорело… https://t.me/obkom48/8011

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lipinsa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Липецкий инсайдер” (@lipinsa), 99 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lipinsa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.