Channel
@linnartpng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
330subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001700592947 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @linnartpng |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/linnartpng |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 330 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 330 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (6 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,339 |
| Reactions total | 467 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
467 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6026040906736472722 | 167 | 35.8% | |
| custom 5364312868785253279 | 80 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5364303544411250263 | 71 | 15.2% | |
| custom 5467706063178453976 | 69 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5341344843975108534 | 39 | 8.35% | |
| custom 5262591434577424247 | 32 | 6.85% | |
| custom 5274236911983038748 | 4 | 0.857% | |
| custom 5321375363467613088 | 3 | 0.642% | |
| custom 5469629323763796670 | 2 | 0.428% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 467reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Моя личная подборка летнего неба и закатов 💗💗 Посмотрите тоже на эту красоту, а то одни скетчи да картинки 🥺 p.s: вы тоже можете поделиться своими снимками
custom 602604090673647272221custom 546770606317845397610custom 53643128687852532795
🤩
custom 536431286878525327934custom 602604090673647272214custom 546770606317845397611
Анонсы покруче рисунков 😏
custom 53643128687852532798custom 53213753634676130882
8 августа сборы фильма-приквела «Щупальца любви: мне бы просто закончить школу» достигли 67 млрд рублей. Это произошло на второй день после старта проката: премьера состоялась 7-го числа. Сейчас «Щупальца» доминирует в российских, немецких и казахстанских кинотеатральных чартах, так же опережая другую российскую новинку — «Последний богатырь. Колобок». На киноафише данная картинка собрала аж 6,7 балла из 5, что делае…
custom 536430354441125026320custom 53643128687852532794custom 52742369119830387483custom 54696293237637966702
Профукала годовщину 4, 3 года уже веду канал, кошмар, как же время летит 😐 Спасибо что продолжаете следить за моим творчеством. Я неоднократно думала всё бросить, но к счастью пока держусь на внутреннем стержне, хз (и вашей поддержке безусловно). Хотелось бы в будущем достичь снова тех цифр, что у меня были 5 лет назад, но увы я слишком хороший соперник прокрастинации 😏 Кстати, рекомендую посмотреть обновлённый инф…
custom 536430354441125026332custom 602604090673647272212custom 53643128687852532793
мамми хойо в процессе 😃
custom 546770606317845397648custom 536430354441125026318custom 536431286878525327914custom 52742369119830387481custom 60260409067364727221
они будут парные 🙂
custom 602604090673647272232custom 534134484397510853418custom 536431286878525327912custom 53643035444112502631
Как же мне не хватает навыков на такие идеи.. 🚬🚬
custom 602604090673647272239custom 526259143457742424712custom 534134484397510853410custom 53213753634676130881
с щитпоста тоже 🚬 + в комментах
custom 602604090673647272248custom 526259143457742424720custom 534134484397510853411
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @linnartpng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 306,618 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Linnartpng ✧ Линнарт” (@linnartpng), 330 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linnartpng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.