Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 琳琳de小家🏠

Channel

琳琳de小家🏠

@linlindexiaojia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

82subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003916785045
TypeChannel
Username@linlindexiaojia
Created29 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/linlindexiaojia

Growth

29835631 August 2026 — 29 subscribers1 September 2026 — 52 subscribers10 September 2026 — 83 subscribers18 September 2026 — 82 subscribers8231 August 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 19 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–91 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:5782-1
10 Sept 2026, 14:5783+31
1 Sept 2026, 01:0652+23
31 Aug 2026, 02:4629first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
392.5%
avg views ÷ 82 subscribers
Avg views / post
322
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.202%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held11 (29 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total2,575
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC80 views0 reactionsread 31 August 2026

┌────────────┐ │⌛出击时间:2026-08-31 │🎞审核老师:琳琳 │📩报告署名:🈚️🫂 │📷人照合一:9 │🌫颜值评估:9 │🎐形体评论:8 │ ⚖项目评估:8 │🤍待客评估:10 │🏺环境评估:8 │🏅学生会AI评估:8.67 │📎回忆细节: │妹妹刚来洛阳不久,也是长久不约无聊刷到想试试,也是很凑巧联系上了,导航上楼,地方很好找,周围也很安全,开门瞬间看到一张很圆润呆萌的脸,内心就觉得这把稳了,妹妹进门就递水很细节,当然年纪也是很小很健谈,聊天不冷场,上面有的服务都有,也很听话,看样子是刚做这一行不久,我可能是不习惯跟别人洗澡,妹妹主动问需不需要帮洗,也是很贴心,有女友感,小穴也很粉嫩,很温暖像进入了家的感觉,胸确实很大,感觉能把我闷死,喜欢嫩妹大胸的老哥们可以果断出击,身材很小一只,很可爱,总的来说妹妹真人比照片长的可爱,属于女友俏皮类型的,多方面综合下来聊天,不冷场会接话情商也

30 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC147 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

宝子们今天满了 今天没约上的约明天的课吧🤪🤪🤪

30 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC429 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

哥哥们3:10分到洛阳站 有给我接站的嘛😎

1

29 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC494 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

哥哥们 明天下午3:10分到高铁站 可以预约明天下午课程哦😋

29 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC484 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

哥哥们 我穿衣服跟拍照不显🐻大 但是我真的有D呀

29 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC482 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

💝年齢: 19 🧘‍♀️体重: 52kg 🤸‍♀️身高: 1.60 🥚胸围: D➕ • 课表以外能配合尽量配合 ♥️服务:助浴 🐍吻 🈚️🍑👄 👅咪咪😘 观音坐莲 激情爱爱💖 清纯妹妹,粉嫩紧致多💦,姿势可以配合❤️,性格温柔不急不催 ,女友感极强😚,刚下海 配合度极高😍 🎀 大学生女友 原装完美身材 波涛汹涌,温柔体贴 🎀清纯天花板 女友感十足 皮肤白嫩细滑 天生敏感体质易💦 💖爱如潮水般的感觉等你来体验 💧费:600P (40分钟) 1200PP (80分钟) cj带: 现金💰 现金💰 现金💰 🈲无套 🈲醉酒 🈲嗑药 🈲桩机 🈲花园 🈲三通 ✈️: @LinLin00o00 双向: @qianqian0o0_bot

1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @linlindexiaojia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“琳琳de小家🏠” (@linlindexiaojia), 82 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linlindexiaojia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.