Channel
@linkwithcats
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
71subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002171271388 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @linkwithcats |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/linkwithcats |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 71 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 70 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 69 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 69 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (5 May 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 48 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
124 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5204018379991566524 | 45 | 36.3% | |
| custom 5222075053864143633 | 29 | 23.4% | |
| custom 5199858742820097121 | 22 | 17.7% | |
| custom 5397812204944769522 | 20 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5460933634192061511 | 7 | 5.65% | |
| custom 5355167234144610638 | 1 | 0.806% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
недавно произошла переписка с коллегой, после которой я решила, что не все знают про навыки эффективной коммуникации в интернетах (в основном, с клиентами, коллегами и подрядчиками). сделала памятку веселую — и как-то отлегло друзей, родных и друллег не касается, можете и дальше продолжать писать мне по 15 сообщений с 1 словом — у вас иммунитет
custom 54609336341920615117
Мотивация для вас позавчерашняя И Юки
custom 52220750538641436337custom 53978122049447695223custom 52040183799915665242
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53978122049447695227custom 52220750538641436335
Иногда листаю вакансии креаторов-создателей контента, и мне попадаются одни рилсмейкеры, предметные фотографы, смм-щики. В маркетинге в основном какие-нибудь СЕО, PR и руководители. Не понимаю, то ли рынок застыл с появлением ии-агентов, то ли все сейчас крепко схватились за свои места. Грустнее всего, что другая часть контента и маркетинга как будто бы в тени. Крутые страницы, гайды, механики, креативные коллаборац…
custom 52040183799915665248
Была в Чувашии, обнималась с родными, собирала ягоды, болтала по душам с близкими (даже брата в Китай провожала), еще раз убедилась, как сильно я люблю семью и уже соскучилась по маминой и бабушкиной еде. Домой я всегда приезжаю взрослой тетей Катей, а уезжаю залюбленым ребенком — это приятное чувство, хоть и я до сих пор не понимаю, как мне снова продолжить жить свою жизнь. А если еще учесть, что я брала отпуск на …
custom 52040183799915665248custom 51998587428200971215custom 53551672341446106381
сюрпризом приехала старшая сестра и мы чуть не довели маму до инфаркта, от неожиданности и радости
custom 520401837999156652412custom 52220750538641436331
vibe net?
custom 520401837999156652410custom 52220750538641436331
кстати, я тут попробовала новый формат ❗️ пока не совсем то, что ожидала, но мне интересно это занятие и нравится, как тексты оживают! хотелось бы уметь снимать так же круто, как это представляется в моей голове, потому что пока картинка не сильно подкрепляет текст, но зато получился воскресный влог — и это тоже хорошо. в последнее время придерживаюсь девиза: лучше сделать на отъебись, чем не сделать вообще
custom 539781220494476952210custom 51998587428200971217
Фотокарточка с Юки за 562,5 рублей. Еще и в таком ужасном качестве…
custom 522207505386414363315
Я родилась 29 июня 1997 года. С самого детства я знаю, что это были 24 лунные сутки. Знаю, потому что бабушка прочитала всё об этом дне и рассказала, что я буду умной, талантливой и многого добьюсь. Если не буду лениться. А я очень ленюсь, я вообще люблю лениться. Возможно, потому что 29 июня 1997 года было воскресенье, а у меня вот уже несколько лет воскресенье — это день-тюлень. Единственный день в неделю, когда я …
custom 519985874282009712110custom 52040183799915665245
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @linkwithcats. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 783,847 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Катины тексты” (@linkwithcats), 71 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linkwithcats.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.