Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DaLi

Channel

DaLi

@links_dl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

360subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001431800472
TypeChannel
Username@links_dl
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/links_dl

Growth

3583603597 August 2026 — 358 subscribers8 August 2026 — 358 subscribers15 August 2026 — 359 subscribers29 August 2026 — 360 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 358–360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 08:12360+1
15 Aug 2026, 18:18359+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:35358no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:11358first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1533.3%
👍1226.7%
💯715.6%
🤝48.89%
🔥24.44%
🤔24.44%
👌12.22%
😎12.22%
😴12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC98 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.16363 Вычислительная эффективность LLM в картинках (почти комиксы).

🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC136 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

source & follow up А вы сомневались !?

😁5👍2😴1

31 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC168 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Governments have the exclusive right to print money to pump their economies. Then a handful of tech companies built trillion-dollar circular investment loops that do the exact same pumping. And we know how it ends in both situations.

26 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC271 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

А что с клодом? Его пожали, заквантовали? Как будто сильно хуже стал последние дни или мне кажется.

  1. Стало хуже35%
  2. Хорошо работает11%
  3. Не пользуюсь34%
  4. Кажется ...19%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👌1

14 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC388 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.12872 Вот зачем рисуют такие схемы в статьях. Картинки должны помогать понять, а тут навайбкодили так что вообще не понятно. Не знаю как вам, по мне так ересь, просто не первый раз уже такой LLM art вижу.

😁7💯6🤔1

23 Jun 2026, 13:14 UTC489 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Работа по автоматическому поиску архитектур LLM. Перебирают около 3,072 разных вариантов (не обязятаельно все обучилось до конца, что-то прунят). Целевые метрики качество + скорость работы для Configuration 2. Основные инсайты: Лучшие архитектуры комбинируют разные компоненты на разных слоях, разные типы внимания, функции активации, нормализацию вместо того чтобы повторять один и тот же блок. Mamba-2 + MLA выб

👍5

23 Jun 2026, 12:01 UTC321 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

SCALING LAWS FOR PRECISION Опять про scaling laws. Обучили порядка 400 моделей. Рассмотрели в режиме PTQ и QAT, т.е. квантизация после и во время обучения. Рассматривают только INT. Во время обучения квантизуем только веса и активации. Что интересного: - Модели обученные на большем колличестве данных больше деградируюти в режиме PTQ. - Если уменьшаем битовость, то надо увеличить данные и число параметров. - Com

🤔1

23 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC229 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The Benchmark Illusion: Pruned LLMs Can Pass Multiple Choice but Fail to Answer Ну как бы да, мы про это знаем, но в статье есть интересные ньюансы. Модели и методоы: 7 моделей: Qwen Family, Mistral и Phi Family. Метод один: WANDA 50%, это скорее минус, но ок. Результаты: (1) Open Generation - модель должна сгененировать овет. (2) Сandidate shown - Модель видит кандидаты ответа в промпте. (3) MC scoring - Вы

20 Jun 2026, 14:08 UTC253 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://openreview.net/pdf?id=eUjUReZoYR INT vs FP квантизация - теория на примере линейной модели. Предпосылки: Спектральное затухание данных это то, что вообще делает обучение возможным в высоких размерностях. Эффективное число направлений, которые модели нужно подогнать, контролируется скоростью затухания собственных значений. - INT разрушает этот процесс, добавляя константы (фиксированный шаг квантизации) к

👍5

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @links_dl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

А что с клодом? Его пожали, заквантовали? Как будто сильно хуже стал последние дни или мне кажется.

  1. Стало хуже35%
  2. Хорошо работает11%
  3. Не пользуюсь34%
  4. Кажется ...19%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DaLi” (@links_dl), 360 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/links_dl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.