Channel
@lingexpert
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
431subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002096976063 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lingexpert |
| Description | Научно-методическое обеспечение лингвистической экспертизы Обратная связь: @lingexpert_bot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lingexpert |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 431 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 431 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 June 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,979 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
131 reactions across 14 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 33 | 25.2% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 17.6% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 12.2% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 6.87% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 6.11% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 5.34% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 4.58% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 3.82% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 3.05% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.05% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 3.05% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 3.05% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 3.05% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.763% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.763% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.763% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.763% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Адвокат добился прекращения производства по делу о возбуждении вражды Суд, принимая доводы защиты, ввиду процессуальных нарушений признал недопустимым лингвистическое исследование видеоролика, содержащего критику властей. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/advokat-dobilsya-prekrashcheniya-proizvodstva-po-delu-o-vozbuzhdenii-vrazhdy/
👏4
Выскажу свою позицию по кейсу об оскорблении Термины типа "оскорбительный" содержат в себе компонент значения "способный делать то, что названо мотивирующим словом". Когда эксперт отвечает, что выражения типа "у нее фляга свистит" неоскорбительны, вряд ли он имеет в виду, что данное выражение не обладает предрасположенностью оскорбить х-а. Если по каким-то причинам он все же имеет в виду именно это, то это требуе…
❤4👍3💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
Когда эксперт утверждает, что фразы, подобные "у нее свистит конкретно, и весна тут ни при чем" не являются оскорбительными, то он:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
Выражение "у нее свистит конкретно, и весна здесь ни при чем
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Суд взыскал 125 тыс. руб. за оскорбления в домовом чате: поводом для острого конфликта явилось шумное поведение "съемных" жильцов, соседи сделали замечание собственнице наемной квартиры, она и сама в долгу не осталась, а серию постов и аудиозаписей личных сообщений в итоге разбирали полиция, суд и эксперты. Итог: с одной ответчицы суд взыскал 100 000 руб. компенсации морального ущерба, с другой – 25 000 руб., да еще…
Роспатент оставил без движения заявку на знак «Лариса Долина» для услуг в сфере недвижимости https://pravo.ru/news/264779/ Представитель певицы назвал инцидент очевидным мошенничеством, а в ведомстве пояснили, что не имеют права принимать анонимные заявки.
🤣8😁4
Спор о регистрации товарного знака «Душнила» Роспатент отказал компании в правовой охране обозначения, но в компании считают это решение проявлением непоследовательного подхода. Компания «Вишневый пирог» решила зарегистрировать товарный знак «Душнила/Dushnila», но Роспатент отказал в регистрации, сославшись на то, что слово уже вошло в разговорную речь и жаргонное. По мнению ведомства, обозначение несет оскорбитель…
🤔2
Здравствуйте, кто-то сталкивался в практике с таким?
😱7👎4😐4🥴1😁1
Уважаемые коллеги! Информируем Вас, что в рамках конференции «Наука о человеке, языке и обществе в контексте судебной экспертизы: теоретические основы и практические аспекты» (01-02 октября 2026 года, г. Москва, МГЛУ) в очно-заочном формате будет проводиться программа повышения квалификации «Прикладное и судебное речеведение» объемом 36 часов. Подробности – в информационном письме № 2.
👍2🕊2❤1
Суд признал слово «фарт» символикой «экстремистского движения» АУЕ. Понятно, что "блатная музыка" оперирует словом фарт, фартовые люди в этой классификации определяются вполне однозначно. Но! В этой же сфере коммуникации используются и вполне нейтральные слова, которые не имеют отношения к уголовному миру и фене. Там есть союзы "и", "а", склонение и спряжение русского имени и глагола. То есть не всё в жаргоне жарго…
🤔7🥴4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lingexpert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Когда эксперт утверждает, что фразы, подобные "у нее свистит конкретно, и весна тут ни при чем" не являются оскорбительными, то он:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Выражение "у нее свистит конкретно, и весна здесь ни при чем
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Судебная лингвистическая экспертиза” (@lingexpert), 431 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lingexpert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.