Channel
@lingerpyq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
192subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004312040836 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lingerpyq |
| Description | 贩卖快乐 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 4 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lingerpyq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 192 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 192 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 183 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,524 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【时间】：2026-08-07 【老师】：玲儿 【留名】：Flip Jumpor 【人照】：9 【服务】：9.5 【态度】：9.5 【环境】：9 【综合】：9.25 【过程】：看到老师之前是个空姐，所以跟老师聊了聊，约好时间出击。 老师颜值在线，跟照片一致，身材匀称，没有赘肉。 缴费，洗澡，上床。 老师服务挺好的，口活很好，没有齿感，还会不时深喉。可以69，老师下面洗的很干净，没有异味。 啪啪，先传教，然后换后入，女上，最后换回传教出货。老师各种姿势都很配合，水很多，很润。 【优点】：颜值在线 空姐加持 【缺点】：无🐍
天气炎热，过来降温
苏州硬了么报告模板： ---【💕基础信息】--- 时间：2026-08-06 老师：#玲儿 留名：无痕 ---【👙整体形象】--- 人照差别：9 身材比例：9 气质魅力：9 ---【👧🏻服务质量】--- 服务水平：9 配合态度：9 舒适度：9 整场综合评分：9 ---【📝服务详情】--- 【过程描述】：提前跟老师约好出击时间，到点准时到达老师住处。好找好停车。 进入房间，老师人照一致，脸蛋挺漂亮的，身材也很好，大长腿很吸睛。 于是主动交了水费，一起洗澡后上床。 老师的两个奶子又大又白，很挺，很诱人，先抱着老师大奶子吃了一会奶，然后跟老师69互舔，老师下面一线天，没有异味，舔了好久。 戴套啪啪，先是传教，老师淫叫不停，然后换后入，腰臀比很好，看起来很刺激，最后女上，我在下面挺老师，吃着奶子出货了。 【优点】：颜值在线 奶子好看 【建议/缺点】：无蛇 【个人评价总结】：推荐 ❤️ 硬了么群友审美各不同，吾之蜜糖，彼之砒霜。不合适直接…
❤1
苏州硬了么报告模板： ---【💕基础信息】--- 时间：2026-08-06 老师：#玲儿 留名：九妹九妹 ---【👙整体形象】--- 人照差别：9 身材比例：9 气质魅力：9 ---【👧🏻服务质量】--- 服务水平：9.5 配合态度：9 舒适度：9.5 整场综合评分：9.17 ---【📝服务详情】--- 【过程描述】：午觉睡了个午勃，果断翻榜，看到新上的玲儿挺有感觉一看空姐退役，果断出击，到地方老师遥控上楼开门眼前一亮五官很精致，穿的绿色包臀毛衣大白兔呼之欲出，进门交水费洗澡好了老师还贴心给擦身体途中还碰我二弟挑逗我，擦干水分上床老师开始要做B面做服务，本人不喜欢那种瘙痒的感觉直接开口，老师口活很不错，一点齿感没有，尤其会用舌头舔马眼下面，会舔二弟的身子身体一激灵抱住头暂停，带雨衣开凿，老师先女上不得不说老师很会摇，看着一对大奶摇摇晃晃上下飞视觉冲击拉满手抓着摸奶头，老是奶头很小，奶子很挺很大，手摸着奶子老实自己摇，很舒服很舒…
❤1
多少年又是多少年
玲儿的朋友圈 pinned a photo
Photo, posted without a caption
开课中
玲儿的朋友圈 pinned Deleted message
空了，现在预约有惊喜
开课了哥哥们，赶紧预约哦
现在空了哥哥们，赶紧预约哦
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lingerpyq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,122,716 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“玲儿的朋友圈” (@lingerpyq), 192 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lingerpyq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.