Channel
@lineqy87
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
120subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002013811247 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lineqy87 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lineqy87 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 120 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 121 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 123 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 123 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 26 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2025 to 20 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💖 高雄｜小婷 身材密碼：155cm / 43kg / C罩杯 / 22歲 價格：10000一節 兩節20000 服務內容：小隻馬甜妹，身材勻稱，服務自然熱情，體驗純真的誘惑。 💌聯絡只只方式① 📱聯絡只只方式② 💞全台優質好妹 Gleezy：zhi527 💯優質美女好評 💣喝茶新手區 😃深夜射射區 ✡️全台旅館推薦3
⭐只只茶坊活動進行時 ⭐ 活動時間：4/27-4/30 現在TG跟LINE都太不穩定 推薦大家用Gleezy 軟體 只只測試過無病毒無廣告 😀😀😀Gleezy與只只聊天 🔠🔠:ZHI56
Photo, posted without a caption
只只遇到一個很可怕的事情，只只在跟一個客人聊天的時候，突然出現一個檔案，然後還說讓我點開，我就說不點，後面客人說點什麼，我就問他：你不是有給我傳一個檔案，我不敢點阿，害我氣的差點把他刪掉了，但他跟我說，他沒跟我傳檔案，我就納悶了，那誰給我傳的，就叫他截圖來看看，結果發現他真的沒傳檔案，現在TG黑客真的太恐怖了，能監控你的聊天記錄來跟別人聊天，已經不止發生一次了，現在很多都無緣無故被刪記錄，或者賬號不見，大家一定要注意，只只現在重新下載了一個軟體 ➡️：Gleezy，是一個熟客大大推薦的，也是因為他的賬號被盜了，所以加只只賴說下載這個比較好用，但是line也很容易被刪除，所以只只試了一下 ，還蠻不錯用的，也推薦給大家，如果有下載的話可以加入只只➡️ID：zhi527
#新竹 #東區 旅館：紫晶彩繪 地址：新竹市東區東南街53巷18號 電話：035620789 價位：3小時780
#高雄 #鳳山區 旅館名：花鄉-鳳山店 地址：台灣高雄市鳳山區誠義路122號 電話：077198299 圖片價位：600/3小時
Channel name was changed to «只只台灣外送旅館推薦»
Channel photo updated
😀大家注意 類似這種或者是鏈接傳給你們的 都是病毒，大家不要點 不要點 不要點 不然賬號就沒啦 切記 不要點！ ！ 不要點 ！！
❤1
#高雄 #小港區 旅館名：香堤晶典 地址：高雄市小港區宏平路579號 電話：078035566
因為賴真的太容易被彈了 大家可以用這個聯絡只只 https://gleezy.net/wth83 安全.隱私.方便 沒有廣告病毒 可以給我添加到桌面 也可以給我設置名稱和頭貼 可以防止女朋友老婆發現了 都加一下 記得告訴我你們是誰嘿
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @lineqy87. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 905,535 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lineqy87 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“只只台灣外送旅館推薦” (@lineqy87), 120 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lineqy87.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.