Channel
@line_bba8093
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
399subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002008404055 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @line_bba8093 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/line_bba8093 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 399 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 407 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 406 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (20 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 82 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
加入千尋的Gleezy群組‼️‼️‼️ 聽客人說現在的TG會需要付費才可以登入 這個Gleezy群組是不需要付費 臺灣全台外送千尋茶坊❤️ Gleezy群組鏈接：https://c.gleezy.top/TB5euBcV 👍第一手客評資訊 Gleezy群組鏈接：https://c.gleezy.top/QX1229 🦄千尋 雙北 新竹龜山 林口 淡水都送 Gleezy群組鏈接：https://c.gleezy.top/5oAVuz9A 🦄 臺中 約妹找千尋 Gleezy群組鏈接：https://c.gleezy.top/wj6jO9Yw 🦄高雄 台南約 找千尋 Gleezy群組鏈接：https://c.gleezy.top/dxuKTikj 千尋の新手喝茶小知識 Gleezy群組鏈接：https://c.gleezy.top/aZn59XIX 快來加入千尋的Gleezy隱私性級高 很安全 不需要付費 很簡單操作…
Photo, posted without a caption
⚠️哥哥們注意！ 為什麼絕對「不能私下加賴」？ 最近有客人跟千尋吐槽在別家約妹 說自己貪圖一時便宜 私下加了小姐的賴 結果最後被套路騙走 30 萬 對方拿了錢直接人間蒸發 求助無門 😢‼️ 為了大家的錢包與安全 千尋一定要跟大家講清楚：為什麼私下約風險這麼大❓ 私聯的嚴重後果是什麼❓ 🚨 私下加賴的 4 大嚴重後果 1️⃣ 連環詐騙陷阱（錢財全被套光） 話術套路： 私下約的時候用甜甜價吸引你，熟悉之後就開始賣慘——「家裡急用」、「奶奶生病」、「要繳房租」 後果： 你一時心軟借一次，後面就有接不完的理由，最後累積幾十萬被套走，對方封鎖消失，錢完全拿不回來！ 2️⃣ 身份真假不明（小心遇到詐騙集團） 後果： 私下聯繫你根本不知道螢幕後面是誰，可能是詐騙集團、甚至是有心人士設局。沒有茶姐在中間把關，你等於把自己暴露在極高的安全風險中。 3️⃣ 服務完全沒保障（被放鳥、貨不對板投訴無門） 後果： 私下約如果遇到照騙、態度…
⚠️ 嚴重警告 千尋外送｜以下地區預約小姐皆需支付車資 為避免雙方產生誤會 請各位客人在預約前先閱讀以下說明 凡是公告上的地區 #車資皆為明碼標價 預約時客服都會事先告知 預約單上也都有清楚標示 代表客人預約即視為同意車資規則 請不要發生以下情況： ❌ 小姐已經抵達現場 才臨時表示不要服務 ❌ 以「打槍小姐」為理由拒付車資 ❌ 明明預約前已經知道車資 事後卻反悔不支付 ❌ 講不過就直接耍賴 封鎖或拒絕付款 車資是小姐往返所產生的交通成本 並非服務費 只要小姐依照預約前往指定地點 即已產生交通支出 因此車資仍需依照預約內容支付 我理解每位客人都有選擇是否消費的權利 但也請尊重小姐的時間與交通成本 若無法接受車資規則 請勿預約 對於惡意拒付車資 臨時反悔 蓄意耍賴的客人 千尋將不再提供後續服務 並列入拒絕往來名單 感謝每一位願意互相尊重 遵守約定的客人 也希望大家都能有愉快 安全的預約體驗
本來以為是單來了 結果是無情的不溝通和人間蒸發💔 真的很無奈 今天又遇到一位讓人心寒的客人 頻道一直以來都寫得很清楚 外送一律需要「先開房」 今天這位客人說要見面一起開 千尋心軟答應了折衷方案 請他先開房 在樓下等妹妹 妹妹已經安排過去了 結果...換來是不溝通 電話不接 訊息不讀 人間蒸發一樣 妹妹在路上奔波的時間和心血 難道在哥哥眼裡就這麼廉價嗎？ 千尋好溝通 不代表千尋可以被隨便耍著玩‼️ 如果不約 講一聲真的不難 直接消失到底算什麼男人❓ 經過這次教訓 千尋不會再為任何人打破「先開房」的規定 我們的信任是留給真正優質 互相尊重的哥哥 這位直接搞消失的客人 千尋已經永久拉黑，慢走不送‼️ 請各位哥哥也給辛苦的妹妹們留下一點基本的尊重 謝謝‼️ 🌐千尋のline🆔：dd8192a ⭐Gleezy：qianxun1229 TG🌐 ：@qianxun1229 點擊這裏一鍵加入千尋の外送所有頻道 ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐…
TG和賴都是沒有在已讀的 下午還有問7月份的活動 看到我在求開門紅 還在問我 結果到他約的時間 人就不見了 千尋是不太愛發這種的 但是這次是真的很生氣🥺 真的沒有這麽被氣過😭
誠信相待，拒絕試水 第一次見面，我們比您更重視！ 我們希望了解您的需求： 理想型: 您喜歡什麼類型的女生？ 預算範圍: 您的預算大概是多少？ 特殊偏好: 您介意刺青或抽煙嗎？ 🌐千尋のline🆔：dd8192a ⭐Gleezy：qianxun1229 TG🌐 ：@qianxun1229 點擊這裏一鍵加入千尋の外送所有頻道 ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⏰性福淫液時間：10:30-12:50 給千尋一個機會 保證讓你一試成主
想找人安排，又怕踩雷？先找千尋。 我不會用華麗的詞彙哄你， 只想用最真實的態度跟你溝通。 這裡沒有強迫、沒有催促、沒有模糊地帶。 只有清楚的流程、透明的資訊， 以及真正把你放在心上的陪伴。 ✅一對一耐心溝通，從你的需求出發 ✅所有細節事先說清楚，絕不臨時變卦 ✅重視你的感受與隱私 第一次聯絡完全不用有壓力， 你可以先簡單聊聊、問問情況， 覺得舒服再決定要不要繼續。 我相信，真正能讓你想再回來的， 是那種「被好好照顧」的感覺。 🌐千尋のline🆔：dd8192a ⭐Gleezy：qianxun1229 TG🌐 ：@qianxun1229 點擊這裏一鍵加入千尋の外送所有頻道 ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⏰性福淫液時間：10:30-12:50 給千尋一個機會 保證讓你一試成主
千尋の新手喝茶小知識 pinned a photo
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @line_bba8093. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,071,586 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“千尋の新手喝茶小知識” (@line_bba8093), 399 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/line_bba8093.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.