Channel
@line_aj586484
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
211subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001618884280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @line_aj586484 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/line_aj586484 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 211 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 210 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 210 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 23 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
8 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️⚠️⚠️如果偶遇這種情況 一定不要輕易點開任何鏈接 #此類賬號對話為詐騙賬號 #此類賬號對話為詐騙賬號 #此類賬號對話為詐騙賬號 如果Telegram官方平臺要鎖你的賬號 會直接鎖掉，根本不會通知你 所以那些 需要你認證電話 需要你點開鏈接或者按鈕的 很多都是詐騙賬號 或者盜號的壞人，你點開你的賬號就登陸到別人設備上去了，各位不要緊張，不要害怕 碰到這類賬號，直接封鎖刪除💢 👾約妹私我✈️ @ake1996_com 😶 _____💯喝寶妹外送茶❤️_____ 營業👌早上10:00~凌晨1:00 📱 @ake1996_com 📱ake288 📱下載Gleezy加我ID：ake288 ☺️各取所需選頻道：點這裏 💔
1️⃣選A就是安排A 2️⃣免車錢地區哥哥/妹妹在預約的時間前後，沒有要忙的事情，妹妹就會提前出發，在附近等候你的房號唷，開好報房號給我，妹妹就從附近過去減少自己等待的時間 3️⃣臨近週五六日，其實很多休息的房間 平日3H 碰到節假日，少許旅館會變成2H 如果哥哥是購買的加節單，也可以讓自己的房間時間比較充裕，不會草草結束，不會過程草草結束，讓自己約會的體驗感更好喲 4️⃣臨近週五六日/節假日 部分的旅館也是不要允許延後加時的，如果購買多節，或者3+1的妹妹，有提前預約的話，時間也會比較夠用，避免你還有服務時間，但是你的旅館時間包容度很低，無法在追加延時，有的哥哥會覺得自己花錢了，但是服務時間沒有享受足夠，這種是你單方面的原因，不是妹妹的原因，節數，寶妹是無法幫你保留的唷，只能可惜了... 5️⃣很多哥哥加我，都說自己配合過很多間 但是失望的原因都是由於等妹妹需要花很久時間，很多時候等1H 還不一定見到人，我不知道這些情況完全是…
1️⃣養成一個很好的表達需求習慣 很多哥哥剛加入的時候，我就會去了解你的喜好，習慣，如要：無套吹/不刺青/不抽菸/排斥牙套妹/只接受無套做/不接受女生有舌釘/耳環/電子煙，這些都是可以告知我的！ 避免，給你推薦一些妹妹，你也沒有多問，我開口問你，你也都是一句，都可以，先看看資料，結果妹妹資料滿意，等人到了面前，因為一些很細小自己無法接受的地方，導致打槍妹妹...也很可惜，你滿意人家的顔值，但是不喜歡對方，有抽電子煙，或者小刺青，等等原因，我們還是提前避免的好，不用去浪費你的旅館時候，也不用去浪費你多等換妹的時間，更加也不用浪費妹妹白跑的時間，所以一定要表明自己的訴求唷 2️⃣建議一定提前預約！ 很多哥哥，做事情總是扭扭捏捏，或者一直猶豫，例如：我下午1點給你推薦的，你說你8點有空，我開始找你確認時間，和地址，真的不是有意要去催單你，而是【妹妹都是兼職的，人家兼職到幾點，甚至於，晚一點是否會有自己的私人事情，這些我沒有電話問之前…
➡️以下是給你們日常需要，或者沒有這方面認知的一個小小提醒而已喲 ①如果確實約到自己比較喜歡，也很滿意的女生 建議平時喜歡，就多節消費，或者頻繁消費一點 #女生都是兼職的 我也不知道妹妹什麼時候上岸，如果上岸之後，寶妹是無法幫你聯絡到的，出現你想要回約，你有錢，我也沒有辦法，只能讓自己留下小小遺憾了 ②回約妹妹不在 寶妹也會偶爾給你們建議約其他的小姐 或許原本預約好的女生，也是按照你們喜歡的類型，幫忙給推薦，確定好了，也是提前邀約好 就麻煩各位哥哥 #不要一直在新的妹妹身上找回約妹妹的影子 #不要一直用當下的女生和之前回約的妹妹去對比 你和回約妹妹有N次接觸，N次肌膚之親，你的天枰肯定是偏向於回約妹妹的，你的角度是不客觀的 #不要當下拒絶了原本預約的女生 又一直覺得我應該可以亮出更好的底牌，我都提前幫你預約了，自然是推薦的誰，邀約的誰，怎麼可能會亂安排，如果打槍，臨時安排，自然是有空的女生名單裏面，幫你篩選儘量是你喜歡的菜…
❤2👍1🙏1
🙇🏻♀️因為剛好發生這些事情 寶妹這邊說一下，各位哥哥有空記得爬文一下 以上的對話內容，就是因為 哥哥早些年約到一個不錯的妹妹 ，在高雄吃到 中間，前前後後也幫忙了超級多次 後面妹妹因為家裏急用錢，高雄的選擇性太多了，就選擇去台南短期兼職一段時間 中間寶妹也建議哥哥可以多節幫忙，或者偶爾頻繁一點的次數幫忙，理解你們作為客人，偶爾有自己的壓力要顧，自己的一些費用要繳納，這些我都不會特別去為難你們非幫忙不可 中間，妹妹在台南跑工，哥哥不僅經常有在幫助，也給回約的妹妹，送了禮物，算真的用心，有心了 只是因為最近回約的女生上岸了，所以昨天合作才發生一些不愉快，哥哥也是知情妹妹上岸了，我在推薦的其他小姐，還是提前預約好了的妹妹😭
😢😢😢 認識近三年多了， 明天就是我們認識的第四年，你第一次消費的時間7/14 或許是因為寶妹重情重義 也或許是因為我個人覺得人是相互的 #這些年，安排妹妹貼了不少業績 有福利，也一一抵用，一一告知，我或許從來沒有想過，原來，人性這種東西，還是會發生在我們身上，真的讓人很受傷 我是女生，或許是我過於感性了，也或許，是我把自己的位置擺錯了，從來都不是妹妹，從來也不是家人，更不是無話不說的至交 默許位置，還是要回歸於：GTO😭
⚠️注意注意 ⚠️注意注意 ⚠️注意注意 寶妹看到很多TG群組的同行業者，都在說 自己的賬號被盜，或者被模仿😢😢😢 很多壞人，模仿茶莊賬號，去詐騙客人 或者模仿茶莊的賬號，去茶姐的簽到群組，私密客人：讓客人匯款，讓客人幫忙註冊東西，收驗證碼等等的惡劣行為 為了避免寶妹的各位金主爸爸 不要被那些壞人禍害，請各位一定要認真查看此篇貼文，寶妹目前在使用的Telegram賬號！ 僅僅只有這：四個賬號 其他如果出現使用寶妹頭貼 私密你匯款 私密你幫忙接收驗證碼 或者註冊某些軟體 或者讓你幫忙購買一些東西 或者幫忙點開某些鏈接 ⚠️一律要有警惕性，各位 不要讓自己被騙，也不要讓自己被不小心盜號🙏🏻
🫡寶妹溫馨提醒‼️ ⚠️注意，注意，注意！ 碰到類似這樣子的鏈接 #千萬不要點 #千萬不要點 #千萬不要點 重要的事情，需要強調三遍 這種，普遍為 ①盜號鏈接，如果你點了之後，你的賬號就會出現，登録在別人的設備上，別人會在你不知情的情況下，用你的賬號，或許涉及詐騙，或許涉及傳播一些未成年視訊或者圖片 會給你的好友帶來被騙的煩惱 或者會給你自己的賬號，手機號帶來永久無法註冊TG的困擾 ②類似這樣的鏈接，如果你點了之後 或許也會出現，你自己的好友被克隆走 【如果你使用的是工作賬號，對你自己的飯碗/職位也會帶來一定的影響，和信任度減低】 ③類似這樣的鏈接，如果你點了之後 別人爬文你的隱私，竊取你的好友資料 或許還會造成對你自己被別人勒索，脅迫 造成自己金錢的不便，和隱私的曝光...等等 切忌：這種類似的鏈接不要因為好奇 也不要因為標題吸引人，也不要因為自己的好色之心，也不要因為自己貪圖小便宜，也不要因為自己貪圖別人共享雲…
👉各位哥哥請謹記： 這類賬號普遍都為 #詐騙賬號 #盜號賬號 看到之後，請勿輕信 #不要亂點鏈接 系統如果刪除你的賬號 或者禁言你的賬號，會直接鎖掉你的賬號可使用的權限，根本不會善良的提醒你😅 所以看到類似的訊息，直接刪除訊息 封鎖對方就好了 不要點鏈接，不要亂點按鈕 👾約妹私✈️ @ake1996_com 😶
❤2
快月底了🥲
❤2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @line_aj586484. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 706,107 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AKE家の喝茶內行部落🈶㊙️” (@line_aj586484), 211 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/line_aj586484.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.